Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The Low Sensitivity and Specificity of a Nutrition Screening Tool in Real Circumstances in a Tertiary Care Hospital Setting
View through CrossRef
Nutrition screening is an essential process to detect children at risk of malnutrition during hospitalization and provide appropriate nutrition management. STRONGkids is a nutrition screening tool which has been implemented in a tertiary-care hospital service in Bangkok, Thailand. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of STRONGkids in the real-situation setting. Electronic Medical Records (EMR) of hospitalized pediatric patients aged 1 month to 18 years from January to December 2019 were reviewed. Those with incomplete medical records and re-admission within 30 days were excluded. Nutrition risk scores and clinical data were collected. Anthropometric data were calculated to Z-score based on the WHO growth standard. The sensitivity (SEN) and specificity (SPE) of STRONGkids were determined against malnutrition status and clinical outcomes. In total, 3914 EMRs (2130 boys, mean age 6.22 ± 4.72 years) were reviewed. The prevalence of acute malnutrition (BMI-for-age Z-score < −2) and stunting (height-for-age Z-score < −2) were 12.9 and 20.5%. SEN and SPE of STRONGkids against acute malnutrition were 63.2 and 55.6%, stunting values were 60.6 and 56.7%, and overall malnutrition values were 59.8 and 58.6%. STRONGkids had low SEN and SPE to detect nutrition risks among hospitalized children in a tertiary-care setting. Further actions are required to improve the quality of nutrition screening in hospital services.
Title: The Low Sensitivity and Specificity of a Nutrition Screening Tool in Real Circumstances in a Tertiary Care Hospital Setting
Description:
Nutrition screening is an essential process to detect children at risk of malnutrition during hospitalization and provide appropriate nutrition management.
STRONGkids is a nutrition screening tool which has been implemented in a tertiary-care hospital service in Bangkok, Thailand.
This study aimed to evaluate the performance of STRONGkids in the real-situation setting.
Electronic Medical Records (EMR) of hospitalized pediatric patients aged 1 month to 18 years from January to December 2019 were reviewed.
Those with incomplete medical records and re-admission within 30 days were excluded.
Nutrition risk scores and clinical data were collected.
Anthropometric data were calculated to Z-score based on the WHO growth standard.
The sensitivity (SEN) and specificity (SPE) of STRONGkids were determined against malnutrition status and clinical outcomes.
In total, 3914 EMRs (2130 boys, mean age 6.
22 ± 4.
72 years) were reviewed.
The prevalence of acute malnutrition (BMI-for-age Z-score < −2) and stunting (height-for-age Z-score < −2) were 12.
9 and 20.
5%.
SEN and SPE of STRONGkids against acute malnutrition were 63.
2 and 55.
6%, stunting values were 60.
6 and 56.
7%, and overall malnutrition values were 59.
8 and 58.
6%.
STRONGkids had low SEN and SPE to detect nutrition risks among hospitalized children in a tertiary-care setting.
Further actions are required to improve the quality of nutrition screening in hospital services.
Related Results
Linking White‐Tailed Deer Density, Nutrition, and Vegetation in a Stochastic Environment
Linking White‐Tailed Deer Density, Nutrition, and Vegetation in a Stochastic Environment
ABSTRACT
Density‐dependent behavior underpins white‐tailed deer (
Odocoileus virginianus
) theory and...
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Abstract
Introduction
Hospitals are high-risk environments for infections. Despite the global recognition of these pathogens, few studies compare microorganisms from community-acqu...
Provocative Tests in Diagnosis of Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Narrative Review
Provocative Tests in Diagnosis of Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Narrative Review
Abstract
Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a group of conditions caused by the compression of the neurovascular bundle within the thoracic outlet. It is classified into three main ...
Optimising tool wear and workpiece condition monitoring via cyber-physical systems for smart manufacturing
Optimising tool wear and workpiece condition monitoring via cyber-physical systems for smart manufacturing
Smart manufacturing has been developed since the introduction of Industry 4.0. It consists of resource sharing and networking, predictive engineering, and material and data analyti...
Performance of a simplified nutrition screening tool for outpatient radiotherapy cancer patients
Performance of a simplified nutrition screening tool for outpatient radiotherapy cancer patients
Public hospitals in Thailand recently adopted a new nutrition screening tool to satisfy documentation requirements for reimbursements through the diagnosis-related group system. Ho...
Retention Dilemma: “Analysis of the Mystery of Employee Attrition in a Teaching Hospital”
Retention Dilemma: “Analysis of the Mystery of Employee Attrition in a Teaching Hospital”
Introduction: Attrition rates in various cadres are a major issue in tertiary care facilities; attrition rates are one
of the important factors used by accrediting bodies to assess...
Artificial intelligence versus manual screening for the detection of diabetic retinopathy: a comparative systematic review and meta-analysis
Artificial intelligence versus manual screening for the detection of diabetic retinopathy: a comparative systematic review and meta-analysis
BackgroundDiabetic retinopathy is one of the leading causes of blindness globally, among individuals with diabetes mellitus. Early detection through screening can help in preventin...
Grains or Veins: Is Enteral Nutrition Really Better Than Parenteral Nutrition? A Look at the Evidence
Grains or Veins: Is Enteral Nutrition Really Better Than Parenteral Nutrition? A Look at the Evidence
Background: Enteral nutrition is said to be better than parenteral nutrition for providing nutrition support to humans. Purpose: To assess the literature documenting the assertions...

