Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Performance of a simplified nutrition screening tool for outpatient radiotherapy cancer patients

View through CrossRef
Public hospitals in Thailand recently adopted a new nutrition screening tool to satisfy documentation requirements for reimbursements through the diagnosis-related group system. However, data on the performance of this instrument remains limited. This study was designed to assess the validity and cutoff points of the Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition of Thailand (SPENT) nutrition screening tool against the patient-generated subjective global assessment (PG-SGA) and malnutrition diagnostic criteria proposed by the global leadership initiative on malnutrition (GLIM) in cancer patients receiving outpatient radiation therapy. A cross-sectional study of 350 patients was conducted from August 2018 to September 2020. All patients were screened for malnutrition using the SPENT nutrition screening tool. The instrument’s sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and agreement were calculated using either the PG-SGA or GLIM malnutrition diagnosis as benchmarks. The cutoff that gave the highest sensitivity and specificity of the SPENT nutrition screening tool was selected. The mean age standard deviation of the 350 cancer patients was 59.9 (13.9) years, and 191 (54.6%) were men. Head and neck cancers were the most common type (35.7%). Against PG-SGA and GLIM malnutrition diagnosis, the SPENT nutrition screening tool demonstrated good sensitivity (85.3% and 82.8%), specificity (84.1% and 59.4%), positive predictive value (90.5% and 64.0%), negative predictive value (76.3% and 79.9%), with moderate strength of agreement (Cohen kappa 0.678, P < .001 and 0.414, P < .001). Using only the first 2 out of 4 questions revealed an acceptable sensitivity and specificity. The SPENT nutrition screening tool is an accurate, sensitive, and specific tool for malnutrition screening in cancer patients receiving outpatient radiotherapy.
Title: Performance of a simplified nutrition screening tool for outpatient radiotherapy cancer patients
Description:
Public hospitals in Thailand recently adopted a new nutrition screening tool to satisfy documentation requirements for reimbursements through the diagnosis-related group system.
However, data on the performance of this instrument remains limited.
This study was designed to assess the validity and cutoff points of the Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition of Thailand (SPENT) nutrition screening tool against the patient-generated subjective global assessment (PG-SGA) and malnutrition diagnostic criteria proposed by the global leadership initiative on malnutrition (GLIM) in cancer patients receiving outpatient radiation therapy.
A cross-sectional study of 350 patients was conducted from August 2018 to September 2020.
All patients were screened for malnutrition using the SPENT nutrition screening tool.
The instrument’s sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and agreement were calculated using either the PG-SGA or GLIM malnutrition diagnosis as benchmarks.
The cutoff that gave the highest sensitivity and specificity of the SPENT nutrition screening tool was selected.
The mean age standard deviation of the 350 cancer patients was 59.
9 (13.
9) years, and 191 (54.
6%) were men.
Head and neck cancers were the most common type (35.
7%).
Against PG-SGA and GLIM malnutrition diagnosis, the SPENT nutrition screening tool demonstrated good sensitivity (85.
3% and 82.
8%), specificity (84.
1% and 59.
4%), positive predictive value (90.
5% and 64.
0%), negative predictive value (76.
3% and 79.
9%), with moderate strength of agreement (Cohen kappa 0.
678, P < .
001 and 0.
414, P < .
001).
Using only the first 2 out of 4 questions revealed an acceptable sensitivity and specificity.
The SPENT nutrition screening tool is an accurate, sensitive, and specific tool for malnutrition screening in cancer patients receiving outpatient radiotherapy.

Related Results

Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract Introduction Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...
Edoxaban and Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials
Edoxaban and Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract Introduction Cancer patients face a venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk that is up to 50 times higher compared to individuals without cancer. In 2010, direct oral anticoagul...
Are Cervical Ribs Indicators of Childhood Cancer? A Narrative Review
Are Cervical Ribs Indicators of Childhood Cancer? A Narrative Review
Abstract A cervical rib (CR), also known as a supernumerary or extra rib, is an additional rib that forms above the first rib, resulting from the overgrowth of the transverse proce...
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction Fibroadenoma is the most common benign breast lesion; however, it carries a potential risk of malignant transformation. This systematic review provides an ove...
Cervical cancer screening utilization and predictors among eligible women in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Cervical cancer screening utilization and predictors among eligible women in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis
BackgroundDespite a remarkable progress in the reduction of global rate of maternal mortality, cervical cancer has been identified as the leading cause of maternal morbidity and mo...
Sequelae after multimodal treatment of rectal cancer
Sequelae after multimodal treatment of rectal cancer
<p dir="ltr">In recent decades, rectal cancer treatment has shifted from traditional surgical resection to include additional modalities such as radiotherapy and chemotherapy...

Back to Top