Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Tracking Clouds: Comparing Geostationary Satellite Observations and Model Data

View through CrossRef
Tracking clouds has multiple applications. It is used for short-term weather forecasting as well as long-term weather and climate analyses. Our long-term goal is to investigate cloud life cycles under different conditions, such as marine or continental areas, over deserts, or in areas with increased anthropogenic aerosols. This is a key element in understanding cloud radiation effects and the human influence on the cloud life cycle.To identify clouds and their trajectories, we are using Particle Image Velocimetry [1] which is well-known for measuring velocities in fluid dynamics. These velocity fields are used to predict the positions of clouds in the next timestep. The predicted positions are then compared to the observed positions to match clouds across timesteps. The algorithm can work on any geostationary satellite data set or equivalent model data [2].Currently we are comparing satellite data from the EUREC4A campaign [3] (observed by the Advanced Baseline Image onboard the GOES-16 satellite) and model output from ICON-LEM [4]. Both datasets are located east of Barbados in the Caribbean Sea. This is done to benchmark the model settings and to identify which of the three model resolution best captures the satellite data. The cloud tracking allows us to look at the lifetimes of the clouds and the development of cloud physical properties over the lifetime of a cloud. This leads to a more refined investigation into the cloud behavior.The presented results are twofold. Firstly, we will show a direct comparison of individual cloud trajectories between observed and model data to establish a deeper understanding of the methodology and datasets. Secondly, we will look at the distributions of clouds sizes and lifetimes to compare different resolutions of model data to the observed satellite data. References:[1] Raffel et al. (2007) "Particle Image Velocimetry - A Practical Guide", Springer Verlag, doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-72308-0[2] Seelig et al. (2021) "Life cycle of shallow marine cumulus clouds from geostationary satellite observations", in JGR: Atmospheres, doi: 10.1029/2021JD035577[3] EUREC4A campaign: www.eurec4a.eu[4] Dipankar et al. (2015) “Large eddy simulation using the general circulation model ICON”, in Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems 7(3): 963-986, doi: 10.1002/2015MS00043
Title: Tracking Clouds: Comparing Geostationary Satellite Observations and Model Data
Description:
Tracking clouds has multiple applications.
It is used for short-term weather forecasting as well as long-term weather and climate analyses.
Our long-term goal is to investigate cloud life cycles under different conditions, such as marine or continental areas, over deserts, or in areas with increased anthropogenic aerosols.
This is a key element in understanding cloud radiation effects and the human influence on the cloud life cycle.
To identify clouds and their trajectories, we are using Particle Image Velocimetry [1] which is well-known for measuring velocities in fluid dynamics.
These velocity fields are used to predict the positions of clouds in the next timestep.
The predicted positions are then compared to the observed positions to match clouds across timesteps.
The algorithm can work on any geostationary satellite data set or equivalent model data [2].
Currently we are comparing satellite data from the EUREC4A campaign [3] (observed by the Advanced Baseline Image onboard the GOES-16 satellite) and model output from ICON-LEM [4].
Both datasets are located east of Barbados in the Caribbean Sea.
This is done to benchmark the model settings and to identify which of the three model resolution best captures the satellite data.
The cloud tracking allows us to look at the lifetimes of the clouds and the development of cloud physical properties over the lifetime of a cloud.
This leads to a more refined investigation into the cloud behavior.
The presented results are twofold.
Firstly, we will show a direct comparison of individual cloud trajectories between observed and model data to establish a deeper understanding of the methodology and datasets.
Secondly, we will look at the distributions of clouds sizes and lifetimes to compare different resolutions of model data to the observed satellite data.
 References:[1] Raffel et al.
(2007) "Particle Image Velocimetry - A Practical Guide", Springer Verlag, doi: 10.
1007/978-3-540-72308-0[2] Seelig et al.
(2021) "Life cycle of shallow marine cumulus clouds from geostationary satellite observations", in JGR: Atmospheres, doi: 10.
1029/2021JD035577[3] EUREC4A campaign: www.
eurec4a.
eu[4] Dipankar et al.
(2015) “Large eddy simulation using the general circulation model ICON”, in Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems 7(3): 963-986, doi: 10.
1002/2015MS00043.

Related Results

Development of a Quasi-Global Fundamental Climate Data Record for Observations from Geostationary Satellites
Development of a Quasi-Global Fundamental Climate Data Record for Observations from Geostationary Satellites
The utilisation of observations of past, present, and future geostationary satellites for climate monitoring is a challenge. Since the late 1970s, space agencies operated up to 50 ...
Is a Fitbit a Diary? Self-Tracking and Autobiography
Is a Fitbit a Diary? Self-Tracking and Autobiography
Data becomes something of a mirror in which people see themselves reflected. (Sorapure 270)In a 2014 essay for The New Yorker, the humourist David Sedaris recounts an obsession spu...
Physical processes in polar stratospheric ice clouds
Physical processes in polar stratospheric ice clouds
A one‐dimensional model of cloud microphysics has been used to simulate the formation and evolution of polar stratospheric ice clouds. The model results are in general agreement wi...
Comparing TROPOMI and GEMS Observations for the Same Sun-Satellite Geometry 
Comparing TROPOMI and GEMS Observations for the Same Sun-Satellite Geometry 
Together with the geostationary imagers over Southeast Asia (GEMS), North America (TEMPO) and Europe (Sentinel 4), TROPOMI and its follow-on low Earth orbit missions will establish...
Mid-level clouds are frequent above the southeast Atlantic stratocumulus clouds
Mid-level clouds are frequent above the southeast Atlantic stratocumulus clouds
Abstract. Shortwave-absorbing aerosols seasonally overlay extensive low-level stratocumulus clouds over the southeast Atlantic. While a lot of attention has been focused on the int...
Satellite observations of cirrus clouds in the lower stratosphere
Satellite observations of cirrus clouds in the lower stratosphere
<div> <p>While cirrus cloud are frequently observed by ground-based lidars in the lowermost stratosphere, evidence from satellite observations is less c...
Developping a new cloud resolving model for Titan’s methane clouds
Developping a new cloud resolving model for Titan’s methane clouds
Titan is the largest moon of Saturn, with a radius around 2575 km, and it is surrounded by a thick atmosphere composed of nitrogen, methane, and many other organic compounds. The t...
Behavioural Dimorphism in Male Ruffs, Philomachus Pugnax (L.)
Behavioural Dimorphism in Male Ruffs, Philomachus Pugnax (L.)
AbstractIn the Ruff two groups of males can be distinguished: independent males and satellite males. This classification is based upon differences in territoriality and behaviour, ...

Back to Top