Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Satellite observations of cirrus clouds in the lower stratosphere
View through CrossRef
<div>
<p>While cirrus cloud are frequently observed by ground-based lidars in the lowermost stratosphere, evidence from satellite observations is less conclusive. Following previous studies, we extracted information on stratospheric cirrus clouds from the latest version of Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIPSO) data (V4) and the Michelson Interferometer for Passive Atmospheric Sounding (MIPAS) data to investigate their global distribution and occurrence frequencies. The detection of stratospheric cirrus with MIPAS is particularly challenging because of the broad field-of-view of the instrument and presented here for the first time.</p>
<p>For the identification of stratospheric cirrus clouds, precise information on both, the cloud top height (CTH) and the tropopause height are crucial. The tropopause heights we derived from ERA-Interim using the WMO criterion for the first thermal tropopause. As tropopause from ERA-Interim show ~0.3km bias with GPS data and CALIPSO data are reported on a ~0.2 km vertical grid, we considered cirrus clouds with CTHs 0.5 km above the tropopause as being stratospheric. We focus on nighttime CALIPSO measurements because of their higher sensitivity. MIPAS measurements are known to overestimate CTHs of optically thick clouds and underestimate the CTHs of optically thin clouds. For the detection of stratospheric cirrus, we started 0.75 km above the tropopause, which is the average CTH overestimation by MIPAS found in previous studies. The comparison with the CALIPSO statistics showed that in the tropics the MIPAS stratospheric cirrus cloud occurrence frequency were slightly larger than for CALIPSO. Assuming that this is due to MIPAS overestimating the CTH, for MIPAS we increased the minimum distance of the CTH to the tropopause until the occurrence frequencies of both measurements agreed.</p>
<p>In the tropics, a four-year mean global analysis of stratospheric cirrus clouds from CALIPSO showed high occurrence frequencies (max. >32%) over the western Pacific Ocean, South Africa, and South America. Stratospheric cirrus clouds were more often detected in December-February than June-August in the tropics. At middle (40-60&#176;) and higher latitudes (>60&#176;), CALIPSO observed about 2% stratospheric cirrus clouds. MIPAS observed about twice as many stratospheric cirrus clouds at northern middle latitudes (>3%) and southern middle latitudes (4%). The maximum differences of nighttime stratospheric cirrus clouds between MIPAS and CALIPSO data were 4-6% over the northern Pacific and 6-8% over the Drake Passage.</p>
<p>Further sensitivity tests with higher average distance to the tropopause for MIPAS resulted in lower occurrence frequencies at middle latitudes. However, they were still larger than the occurrence frequencies derived from CALIPSO data. Hence, we consider the finding of higher stratospheric cirrus cloud occurrence frequencies at middle latitudes by MIPAS as robust. One possible explanation for MIPAS finding more stratospheric cirrus clouds at middle latitudes is that MIPAS is more sensitive towards thin cirrus clouds than CALIPSO (nighttime measurements), because of the satellite limb measurement geometry.</p>
</div>
Title: Satellite observations of cirrus clouds in the lower stratosphere
Description:
<div>
<p>While cirrus cloud are frequently observed by ground-based lidars in the lowermost stratosphere, evidence from satellite observations is less conclusive.
Following previous studies, we extracted information on stratospheric cirrus clouds from the latest version of Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIPSO) data (V4) and the Michelson Interferometer for Passive Atmospheric Sounding (MIPAS) data to investigate their global distribution and occurrence frequencies.
The detection of stratospheric cirrus with MIPAS is particularly challenging because of the broad field-of-view of the instrument and presented here for the first time.
</p>
<p>For the identification of stratospheric cirrus clouds, precise information on both, the cloud top height (CTH) and the tropopause height are crucial.
The tropopause heights we derived from ERA-Interim using the WMO criterion for the first thermal tropopause.
As tropopause from ERA-Interim show ~0.
3km bias with GPS data and CALIPSO data are reported on a ~0.
2 km vertical grid, we considered cirrus clouds with CTHs 0.
5 km above the tropopause as being stratospheric.
We focus on nighttime CALIPSO measurements because of their higher sensitivity.
MIPAS measurements are known to overestimate CTHs of optically thick clouds and underestimate the CTHs of optically thin clouds.
For the detection of stratospheric cirrus, we started 0.
75 km above the tropopause, which is the average CTH overestimation by MIPAS found in previous studies.
The comparison with the CALIPSO statistics showed that in the tropics the MIPAS stratospheric cirrus cloud occurrence frequency were slightly larger than for CALIPSO.
Assuming that this is due to MIPAS overestimating the CTH, for MIPAS we increased the minimum distance of the CTH to the tropopause until the occurrence frequencies of both measurements agreed.
</p>
<p>In the tropics, a four-year mean global analysis of stratospheric cirrus clouds from CALIPSO showed high occurrence frequencies (max.
>32%) over the western Pacific Ocean, South Africa, and South America.
Stratospheric cirrus clouds were more often detected in December-February than June-August in the tropics.
At middle (40-60&#176;) and higher latitudes (>60&#176;), CALIPSO observed about 2% stratospheric cirrus clouds.
MIPAS observed about twice as many stratospheric cirrus clouds at northern middle latitudes (>3%) and southern middle latitudes (4%).
The maximum differences of nighttime stratospheric cirrus clouds between MIPAS and CALIPSO data were 4-6% over the northern Pacific and 6-8% over the Drake Passage.
</p>
<p>Further sensitivity tests with higher average distance to the tropopause for MIPAS resulted in lower occurrence frequencies at middle latitudes.
However, they were still larger than the occurrence frequencies derived from CALIPSO data.
Hence, we consider the finding of higher stratospheric cirrus cloud occurrence frequencies at middle latitudes by MIPAS as robust.
One possible explanation for MIPAS finding more stratospheric cirrus clouds at middle latitudes is that MIPAS is more sensitive towards thin cirrus clouds than CALIPSO (nighttime measurements), because of the satellite limb measurement geometry.
</p>
</div>.
Related Results
Midlatitude cirrus cloud investigations from ground-based lidar and ERA-5 re-analysis
Midlatitude cirrus cloud investigations from ground-based lidar and ERA-5 re-analysis
Cirrus as high-altitude clouds are formed at the highest layers of the troposphere, usually at the altitude range 5,000 – 14,000m. Cirrus clouds are composed mainly by as...
Global analysis of cirrus origins using satellite observations and Lagrangian trajectories
Global analysis of cirrus origins using satellite observations and Lagrangian trajectories
In addition to their formation mechanisms, the origin of cirrus clouds (liquid-origin or in situ) can significantly influence their microphysical and radiative properties. Liquid-o...
Volcanic impact on cirrus clouds
Volcanic impact on cirrus clouds
<p>Cirrus clouds have a net warming effect on climate due to their high altitude and low optical thickness. Small changes in their properties may however shift this t...
Subvisual Cirrus
Subvisual Cirrus
Starting during World War II, pilots flying high over the tropics reported “a thin layer of cirrus 500ft above us”. Yet as they ascended, they still observed more thin cirrus above...
Long-lived contrails in cirrus clouds underestimated with uncertain climate impact
Long-lived contrails in cirrus clouds underestimated with uncertain climate impact
Contrail-cirrus is considered the most important component of aviation-induced climate impact. However, a reliable assessment requires a better understanding of the environment in ...
The spatial heterogeneity and inhomogeneity of cirrus microphysical properties evaluated globally using in situ measurements
The spatial heterogeneity and inhomogeneity of cirrus microphysical properties evaluated globally using in situ measurements
Cirrus clouds having a high degree of spatially heterogeneous/inhomogeneous cloud properties have been shown to correspond with increased wave activity (e.g., Podglajen et al., 201...
Investigating cirrus cloud formation and evolution combining satellite observations and Lagrangian microphysical modelling
Investigating cirrus cloud formation and evolution combining satellite observations and Lagrangian microphysical modelling
Étude de la formation et de l'évolution des cirrus à l'aide d'observations satellitaires et de la modélisation microphysique lagrangienne
Les nuages influencent le ...
Investigating the Impact of Aerosols on Liquid-Origin Cirrus from Global Observations and Reanalysis Data
Investigating the Impact of Aerosols on Liquid-Origin Cirrus from Global Observations and Reanalysis Data
Complementarily to their formation mechanism, the origin of cirrus (liquid or in-situ) can substantially affect their microphysical and radiative properties. Liquid-origin cirrus, ...

