Javascript must be enabled to continue!
GTS2020: The Paleogene Period
View through CrossRef
<p>It&#8217;s nearly forty years ago that &#8216;A Geologic Time Scale 1982&#8217; appeared (Harland et al. 1982); it was succeeded by major updates in 1989 (Harland et al. 1990), 2004 and 2012 (Gradstein et al. 2004, 2012 &#8211; known as GTS2004 and GTS2012, respectively). The primary rationale was &#8220;to show as clearly as we can how such a scale has been constructed&#8221; (Harland et al. 1982). Each update was about twice the length of the previous version. Consistently aiming to achieve a common language with respect to chronostratigraphic units and geological time, these books have served as state-of-the-art summaries for the entire geological community, both in academia and industry. The last two time scale books contained a discrete and extensive chapter devoted entirely to the stratigraphy of the Paleogene, summarizing information on all stages, established GSSPs, various biozonations and the creation of the time scale&#160; (Luterbacher et al. 2004; Vandenberghe et al. 2012). After a three-year-long preparation GTS2020 was published in November 2020.</p><p>All Paleocene and Oligocene stages (Danian, Selandian, Thanetian, resp. Rupelian, and Chattian) have formally ratified definitions and so have the Ypresian, Lutetian, and Priabonian stages of the Eocene. We anticipate that the Global Boundary Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP) for the Bartonian Stage still requires more research before all stages of the Paleogene (66-23 Ma) are formally defined. Paleogene marine microfossil groups (planktonic and larger benthic foraminifera, calcareous nannofossils, radiolarians, organic-walled dinoflagellate cysts) provide robust zonation schemes for regional to global correlation and are integrated within the magneto-biochronological framework. Since land mammal faunas are also increasingly being studied with an integrated magnetostratigraphic and/or chemostratigraphic and geochronologic approach, their age calibrations have considerably been improved since GTS2012. Stable isotope analysis and XRF (X-ray fluorescence) scanning have become key tools in Paleogene high-resolution stratigraphy, correlation, and time scale construction. Stable oxygen and carbon isotope records also provide insight into trends in paleoclimate and carbon cycling, such as the warming trend starting in the middle Paleocene and culminating during the Early Eocene Climatic Optimum, and the subsequent cooling leading to a change from greenhouse to icehouse conditions at the onset of the Oligocene. Numerous short-term isotope excursions mark high climatic variability, expressed in hyperthermal (transient global warming) events (62-40 Ma) and cooling/glaciation events (38-23 Ma). At the same time, these stable isotope excursions provide accurate stratigraphic constraints and enable land-sea correlations, such as for the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum, the &#8220;Mother of all hyperthermals.&#8221; Orbital tuning of sedimentary cycles, calibrated to the geomagnetic polarity and biostratigraphic scales, has greatly improved the resolution of the Paleogene time scale over the last two decades. We now have astronomical age control for almost all geomagnetic polarity reversals, but differences between published age models still persist through the &#8220;Eocene astronomical time scale gap&#8221; spanning Chrons C20r through C22n (43.5-49.5 Ma).</p>
Copernicus GmbH
Title: GTS2020: The Paleogene Period
Description:
<p>It&#8217;s nearly forty years ago that &#8216;A Geologic Time Scale 1982&#8217; appeared (Harland et al.
1982); it was succeeded by major updates in 1989 (Harland et al.
1990), 2004 and 2012 (Gradstein et al.
2004, 2012 &#8211; known as GTS2004 and GTS2012, respectively).
The primary rationale was &#8220;to show as clearly as we can how such a scale has been constructed&#8221; (Harland et al.
1982).
Each update was about twice the length of the previous version.
Consistently aiming to achieve a common language with respect to chronostratigraphic units and geological time, these books have served as state-of-the-art summaries for the entire geological community, both in academia and industry.
The last two time scale books contained a discrete and extensive chapter devoted entirely to the stratigraphy of the Paleogene, summarizing information on all stages, established GSSPs, various biozonations and the creation of the time scale&#160; (Luterbacher et al.
2004; Vandenberghe et al.
2012).
After a three-year-long preparation GTS2020 was published in November 2020.
</p><p>All Paleocene and Oligocene stages (Danian, Selandian, Thanetian, resp.
Rupelian, and Chattian) have formally ratified definitions and so have the Ypresian, Lutetian, and Priabonian stages of the Eocene.
We anticipate that the Global Boundary Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP) for the Bartonian Stage still requires more research before all stages of the Paleogene (66-23 Ma) are formally defined.
Paleogene marine microfossil groups (planktonic and larger benthic foraminifera, calcareous nannofossils, radiolarians, organic-walled dinoflagellate cysts) provide robust zonation schemes for regional to global correlation and are integrated within the magneto-biochronological framework.
Since land mammal faunas are also increasingly being studied with an integrated magnetostratigraphic and/or chemostratigraphic and geochronologic approach, their age calibrations have considerably been improved since GTS2012.
Stable isotope analysis and XRF (X-ray fluorescence) scanning have become key tools in Paleogene high-resolution stratigraphy, correlation, and time scale construction.
Stable oxygen and carbon isotope records also provide insight into trends in paleoclimate and carbon cycling, such as the warming trend starting in the middle Paleocene and culminating during the Early Eocene Climatic Optimum, and the subsequent cooling leading to a change from greenhouse to icehouse conditions at the onset of the Oligocene.
Numerous short-term isotope excursions mark high climatic variability, expressed in hyperthermal (transient global warming) events (62-40 Ma) and cooling/glaciation events (38-23 Ma).
At the same time, these stable isotope excursions provide accurate stratigraphic constraints and enable land-sea correlations, such as for the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum, the &#8220;Mother of all hyperthermals.
&#8221; Orbital tuning of sedimentary cycles, calibrated to the geomagnetic polarity and biostratigraphic scales, has greatly improved the resolution of the Paleogene time scale over the last two decades.
We now have astronomical age control for almost all geomagnetic polarity reversals, but differences between published age models still persist through the &#8220;Eocene astronomical time scale gap&#8221; spanning Chrons C20r through C22n (43.
5-49.
5 Ma).
</p>.
Related Results
Proxy-Informed Model Estimates of Early Paleogene Climate
Proxy-Informed Model Estimates of Early Paleogene Climate
As global temperatures approach levels unprecedented in human history,
past warm periods offer insights into climate variations associated with
increasing greenhouse gas concentrat...
Control Effects of Huizhou Depression Tectonic Evolution on the Paleogene Formation Sedimentary Differences
Control Effects of Huizhou Depression Tectonic Evolution on the Paleogene Formation Sedimentary Differences
Abstract
Huizhou Depression is in the exploration peak stage at present. The main target layer is gradually extending from the middle-shallow traps to the deep paleo...
Palaeogene Biostratigraphic Characteristics of Red Basins In Western Henan and Its Adjacent Areas, With an Outline of Palaeogene Palaeobiogeographic Provinces of China
Palaeogene Biostratigraphic Characteristics of Red Basins In Western Henan and Its Adjacent Areas, With an Outline of Palaeogene Palaeobiogeographic Provinces of China
Abstract This article is a preliminary summary of Paleogene biostratigraphy of the Liguanqiao, Tantou and Yuanqu basins, with a new proposal for Paleogene paleobiogeographic provin...
Diagenetic Mineralogy and Controls on Albitization and Laumontite Formation in Paleogene Arkoses, Santa Ynez Mountains, California
Diagenetic Mineralogy and Controls on Albitization and Laumontite Formation in Paleogene Arkoses, Santa Ynez Mountains, California
Abstract
The stratigraphic and lateral distributions of authigenic minerals in feldspar-rich Paleogene sandstones of the Santa Ynez Mountains, California, are imp...
Paleogene lake deep water sedimentary facies in the northern zone of the Chezhen Sag, Bohai Bay Basin, China
Paleogene lake deep water sedimentary facies in the northern zone of the Chezhen Sag, Bohai Bay Basin, China
AbstractThis study researches an important genetic type of Paleogene sublacustrine fan deposits in widely developed glutenite bodies in the northern Chezhen Sag. The Paleogene subl...
Geochemical characteristics and hydrocarbon generation modeling of the Paleogene source rocks in the Qinnan Depression, Bohai Bay Basin, China
Geochemical characteristics and hydrocarbon generation modeling of the Paleogene source rocks in the Qinnan Depression, Bohai Bay Basin, China
Introduction: The Qinnan Depression in the Bohai Bay Basin is lowly explored, where hydrocarbon generation potential of source rocks is required detailed investigation to identify ...
DINOSTRAT version 2.0-GTS2020
DINOSTRAT version 2.0-GTS2020
Abstract. DINOSTRAT version 2.0-GTS2020 is now available (Bijl et al., 2023a; http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7791273). This version updates DINOSTRAT to the Geologic Time Scale 2...
DINOSTRAT version 2.0-GTS2020
DINOSTRAT version 2.0-GTS2020
Abstract. Mesozoic–Cenozoic organic-walled dinoflagellate cyst (dinocyst) biostratigraphy is a crucial tool for relative and numerical age control in complex ancient sedimentary sy...

