Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Brentano’s Thesis Revisited
View through CrossRef
In Psychologie, Brentano introduced a new mark of mental phenomena: all and only mental phenomena are intentional. No physical state or property is intentional. Under the label ‘Brentano’s Thesis’ this mark of the mental has guided philosophical research both by phenomenologists and by analytic philosophers of mind. This chapter reconstructs the view of intentionality that underlies Brentano’s Thesis and finds it under-explained. Brentano clearly struggled to convey to his readers what he took to be the common feature of the mental. The chapter goes on to assess attempts to explain intentionality in independently intelligible terms by such philosophers as Chisholm, Crane, and Molnar, and finds them all wanting.
Title: Brentano’s Thesis Revisited
Description:
In Psychologie, Brentano introduced a new mark of mental phenomena: all and only mental phenomena are intentional.
No physical state or property is intentional.
Under the label ‘Brentano’s Thesis’ this mark of the mental has guided philosophical research both by phenomenologists and by analytic philosophers of mind.
This chapter reconstructs the view of intentionality that underlies Brentano’s Thesis and finds it under-explained.
Brentano clearly struggled to convey to his readers what he took to be the common feature of the mental.
The chapter goes on to assess attempts to explain intentionality in independently intelligible terms by such philosophers as Chisholm, Crane, and Molnar, and finds them all wanting.
Related Results
A Relation ‘that relates itself to itself’, Some Regress Threats, and a Mystery
A Relation ‘that relates itself to itself’, Some Regress Threats, and a Mystery
Brentano’s metaphysics of consciousness faces several questions: Can a relation be self-relating without leading to counter-intuitive consequences? Has the vicious regress of consc...
Introduction
Introduction
The introduction outlines and motivates the main questions of the book. I will engage with two philosophical questions—‘What is the nature of mind?’ and ‘What is the structure of c...
Intentionality Primitivism
Intentionality Primitivism
Brentano endorsed (conceptual) primitivism about intentionality and the view that intentionality is fully revealed to us in its instantiations. The pros and cons of Brentano’s view...
Metaontology
Metaontology
Brentano’s theory of judgment serves as a springboard for his conception of reality, indeed for his ontology. It does so, indirectly, by inspiring a very specific metaontology. To ...
Intentionality
Intentionality
This chapter argues for two main claims. First, it is argued that, unlike the notion of intentionality central to modern philosophy of mind, Brentano’s notion of intentionality has...
Attention, Adumbration, and a Neglected Mark of the Mental
Attention, Adumbration, and a Neglected Mark of the Mental
Brentano never investigated whether the ‘peculiar feature’ of inner perception—that it can never become inner observation—that distinguishes our awareness of the mental from other ...
A Brief Conclusion
A Brief Conclusion
I would like the reader to take away from this book the following morals.First, Brentano was wrong to say that intentionality is the most distinctive mark of mental phenomena (see ...

