Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Judicial Independence in China
View through CrossRef
This volume challenges the conventional wisdom about judicial independence in China and its relationship to economic growth, rule of law, human rights protection, and democracy. The volume adopts an interdisciplinary approach that places China's judicial reforms and the struggle to enhance the professionalism, authority, and independence of the judiciary within a broader comparative and developmental framework. Contributors debate the merits of international best practices and their applicability to China; provide new theoretical perspectives and empirical studies; and discuss civil, criminal, and administrative cases in urban and rural courts. This volume contributes to several fields, including law and development and the promotion of rule of law and good governance, globalization studies, neo-institutionalism and studies of the judiciary, the emerging literature on judicial reforms in authoritarian regimes, Asian legal studies, and comparative law more generally.
Cambridge University Press
Title: Judicial Independence in China
Description:
This volume challenges the conventional wisdom about judicial independence in China and its relationship to economic growth, rule of law, human rights protection, and democracy.
The volume adopts an interdisciplinary approach that places China's judicial reforms and the struggle to enhance the professionalism, authority, and independence of the judiciary within a broader comparative and developmental framework.
Contributors debate the merits of international best practices and their applicability to China; provide new theoretical perspectives and empirical studies; and discuss civil, criminal, and administrative cases in urban and rural courts.
This volume contributes to several fields, including law and development and the promotion of rule of law and good governance, globalization studies, neo-institutionalism and studies of the judiciary, the emerging literature on judicial reforms in authoritarian regimes, Asian legal studies, and comparative law more generally.
Related Results
Judicial Avoidance
Judicial Avoidance
This book analyses cases of judicial avoidance: what happens when courts leave some or all of the merits of a case undecided?
It explores examples of justiciability asses...
49. Judicial review
49. Judicial review
This chapter discusses the rules for judicial review. Judicial review lies against public bodies and must be brought by a person with a sufficient interest. There are six remedies ...
49. Judicial review
49. Judicial review
This chapter discusses the rules for judicial review. Judicial review lies against public bodies and must be brought by a person with a sufficient interest. There are six remedies ...
49. Judicial Review
49. Judicial Review
This chapter discusses the rules for judicial review. Judicial review lies against public bodies and must be brought by a person with a sufficient interest. There are six remedies ...
Judicial Review Handbook
Judicial Review Handbook
“… an institution for those who practise public law…it has the authority that comes from being compiled by an author of singular distinction”. (Lord Woolf, from the Foreword to the...
Judicial Review
Judicial Review
Abstract
Written by three experienced practitioners, this definitive work provides unrivalled analysis and guidance on the law of judicial review. Updated with th...
Constitutional judicial process
Constitutional judicial process
In the textbook, in accordance with the requirements of the Federal State Educational Standard of Higher Professional Education on the basis of current legislation, judicial practi...

