Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Judicial Avoidance
View through CrossRef
This book analyses cases of judicial avoidance: what happens when courts leave some or all of the merits of a case undecided?
It explores examples of justiciability assessments and deferential approaches regarding the decision of another authority and examines legitimacy issues involving judicial avoidance. The reader is presented with answers to two fundamental questions that guide the development of the book:
Is it legitimate to practise judicial avoidance?How could judicial avoidance be practised legitimately?
The conflict of competences, which often emerges in instances of judicial avoidance, is an important book baseline. From this conflict, the book considers and defends the possibility of applying ‘formal balancing’ to provide a clearer structure of the exercise of justiciability and judicial deference. The ‘formal balancing’ methodology is based on Alexy’s principles theory, and its connection with judicial avoidance represents a significant contribution and novel point in constitutional adjudication.
Hart Studies in Constitutional Theory: Volume 4
Title: Judicial Avoidance
Description:
This book analyses cases of judicial avoidance: what happens when courts leave some or all of the merits of a case undecided?
It explores examples of justiciability assessments and deferential approaches regarding the decision of another authority and examines legitimacy issues involving judicial avoidance.
The reader is presented with answers to two fundamental questions that guide the development of the book:
Is it legitimate to practise judicial avoidance?How could judicial avoidance be practised legitimately?
The conflict of competences, which often emerges in instances of judicial avoidance, is an important book baseline.
From this conflict, the book considers and defends the possibility of applying ‘formal balancing’ to provide a clearer structure of the exercise of justiciability and judicial deference.
The ‘formal balancing’ methodology is based on Alexy’s principles theory, and its connection with judicial avoidance represents a significant contribution and novel point in constitutional adjudication.
Hart Studies in Constitutional Theory: Volume 4.
Related Results
49. Judicial review
49. Judicial review
This chapter discusses the rules for judicial review. Judicial review lies against public bodies and must be brought by a person with a sufficient interest. There are six remedies ...
49. Judicial review
49. Judicial review
This chapter discusses the rules for judicial review. Judicial review lies against public bodies and must be brought by a person with a sufficient interest. There are six remedies ...
49. Judicial Review
49. Judicial Review
This chapter discusses the rules for judicial review. Judicial review lies against public bodies and must be brought by a person with a sufficient interest. There are six remedies ...
Judicial Review Handbook
Judicial Review Handbook
“… an institution for those who practise public law…it has the authority that comes from being compiled by an author of singular distinction”. (Lord Woolf, from the Foreword to the...
Judicial Review
Judicial Review
Abstract
Written by three experienced practitioners, this definitive work provides unrivalled analysis and guidance on the law of judicial review. Updated with th...
Constitutional judicial process
Constitutional judicial process
In the textbook, in accordance with the requirements of the Federal State Educational Standard of Higher Professional Education on the basis of current legislation, judicial practi...
Judicial Decisions on the Law of International Organizations
Judicial Decisions on the Law of International Organizations
Abstract
Concomitant with the rising relevance of international organizations in international affairs, and the general turn to litigation to settle disputes, intern...