Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Aristotelian Reminiscences in Philo
View through CrossRef
Abstract
The first part of this article deals with two cases of what seems to be Aristotelian reminiscences in the works of Philo of Alexandria. A passage in Quod deterius and a passage in De agricultura show close verbal reminiscences to two passages in Book i of Nicomachean Ethics; and a passage in De migratione Abrahami shows verbal reminiscences to two passages in Book ii. Since it appears from Book v of De finibus that Antiochus of Ascalon had already read at least parts of Nicomachean Ethics; and the first commentator on the Ethics, Aspasius, has clear references to some predecessors who had already read and discussed this work, I argue for the possibility that Philo also read the Nicomachean Ethics. The second part deals with an almost forgotten book review by Jacob Freudenthal, published in 1875, which argues that Philo was familiar with various parts of the Aristotelian corpus as we have it. I examine his detailed arguments and conclude that, with all due respect to a great scholar, they do not seem to prove his point.
Title: Aristotelian Reminiscences in Philo
Description:
Abstract
The first part of this article deals with two cases of what seems to be Aristotelian reminiscences in the works of Philo of Alexandria.
A passage in Quod deterius and a passage in De agricultura show close verbal reminiscences to two passages in Book i of Nicomachean Ethics; and a passage in De migratione Abrahami shows verbal reminiscences to two passages in Book ii.
Since it appears from Book v of De finibus that Antiochus of Ascalon had already read at least parts of Nicomachean Ethics; and the first commentator on the Ethics, Aspasius, has clear references to some predecessors who had already read and discussed this work, I argue for the possibility that Philo also read the Nicomachean Ethics.
The second part deals with an almost forgotten book review by Jacob Freudenthal, published in 1875, which argues that Philo was familiar with various parts of the Aristotelian corpus as we have it.
I examine his detailed arguments and conclude that, with all due respect to a great scholar, they do not seem to prove his point.
Related Results
Origen in the Likeness of Philo: Eusebius of Caesarea’s Portrait of the Model Scholar
Origen in the Likeness of Philo: Eusebius of Caesarea’s Portrait of the Model Scholar
This article discusses the similarities between the biographical presentations of Philo and Origen in Eusebius' Ecclesiastical History. The tension Eusebius feels between Philo Chr...
Isidore of Pelusium
Isidore of Pelusium
Abstract
The correspondence of Isidore of Pelusium (c.360–440 ce) reveals knowledge of the writings of Philo of Alexandria, but the extent to which one can qualify t...
Flavius Josephus
Flavius Josephus
Abstract
This chapter argues that Josephus drew inspiration from Philo’s writings, especially those with an apologetic dimension, because he shared some of Philo’s v...
The Mountebank Johannes Michael Philo (fl. 1667-1677) and his Dutch Relatives
The Mountebank Johannes Michael Philo (fl. 1667-1677) and his Dutch Relatives
Cette contribution est une tentative de reconstruction partielle, basée sur des documents d’archives inédits, d’un certain nombre de faits de la vie de Johan Michael Philo (ca. 166...
The Modal Logic of Aristotelian Diagrams
The Modal Logic of Aristotelian Diagrams
In this paper, we introduce and study AD-logic, i.e., a system of (hybrid) modal logic that can be used to reason about Aristotelian diagrams. The language of AD-logic, LAD, is int...
Mosaic Paideia: The Law of Moses within Philo of Alexandria’s Model of Jewish Education
Mosaic Paideia: The Law of Moses within Philo of Alexandria’s Model of Jewish Education
AbstractPaideia is one of Philo’s most consistent preoccupations. It was so thoroughly foundational for the Alexandrian that he built it into nearly every aspect of his philosophy ...
Introduction: Philo of Larissa
Introduction: Philo of Larissa
Abstract
Philo was the last sceptical leader of the Platonic Academy. The long tradition of Academic scepticism, initiated by Arcesilaos, confirmed by Carneades and ...
Philo of Alexandria
Philo of Alexandria
Philo of Alexandria (c. 20 bce–c. 50 ce) was the most prolific commentator on the Pentateuch in the Second Temple Jewish period (539 bce–70/135 ce). Philo was a member of a promine...

