Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Shapley Value-Based Carbon Emission Responsibility Allocation in Power Systems with Energy Storage

View through CrossRef
Energy storage systems (ESS) are essential for power system decarbonization, yet their carbon emission responsibilities remain ambiguous under market operations due to their unique bidirectional operation characteristics. This paper develops a multi-period carbon responsibility allocation framework integrating system operation modeling, sequential decoupling simulation, and Shapley-based fairness principles. To address computational intractability of exact Shapley values as participant numbers increase, we employ KernelSHAP to approximate average marginal contributions through weighted regression.  Case studies on IEEE 14-bus and 30-bus systems demonstrate three key findings: (i) KernelSHAP achieves accurate Shapley approximations in the carbon allocation context with relative errors below 0.5\% while enabling scalable allocation; (ii) thermal generators consistently bear positive responsibilities as direct emitters while renewables receive negative allocations; (iii) ESS receive near-zero net responsibilities, with charging costs offset by discharging credits. Sensitivity analysis across renewable penetration levels and seven-day horizons confirms allocation robustness. The framework provides fairness benchmarks for evaluating existing carbon responsibility methods and policy design, supporting ESS exemption from emission penalties while clarifying their carbon-neutral role in decarbonization. This work bridges fairness theory with practical implementation, advancing equitable carbon responsibility distribution in electricity markets.
Title: Shapley Value-Based Carbon Emission Responsibility Allocation in Power Systems with Energy Storage
Description:
Energy storage systems (ESS) are essential for power system decarbonization, yet their carbon emission responsibilities remain ambiguous under market operations due to their unique bidirectional operation characteristics.
This paper develops a multi-period carbon responsibility allocation framework integrating system operation modeling, sequential decoupling simulation, and Shapley-based fairness principles.
To address computational intractability of exact Shapley values as participant numbers increase, we employ KernelSHAP to approximate average marginal contributions through weighted regression.
  Case studies on IEEE 14-bus and 30-bus systems demonstrate three key findings: (i) KernelSHAP achieves accurate Shapley approximations in the carbon allocation context with relative errors below 0.
5\% while enabling scalable allocation; (ii) thermal generators consistently bear positive responsibilities as direct emitters while renewables receive negative allocations; (iii) ESS receive near-zero net responsibilities, with charging costs offset by discharging credits.
Sensitivity analysis across renewable penetration levels and seven-day horizons confirms allocation robustness.
The framework provides fairness benchmarks for evaluating existing carbon responsibility methods and policy design, supporting ESS exemption from emission penalties while clarifying their carbon-neutral role in decarbonization.
This work bridges fairness theory with practical implementation, advancing equitable carbon responsibility distribution in electricity markets.

Related Results

Carbon Storage Assurance Facility Enterprise (CarbonSAFE): Carbon Storage Infrastructure Development for a Sustainable Future
Carbon Storage Assurance Facility Enterprise (CarbonSAFE): Carbon Storage Infrastructure Development for a Sustainable Future
The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management’s (FECM) Carbon Transport and Storage (CTS) Program focuses on addressing technical and non-techni...
Shapley Value-Based Carbon Emission Responsibility Allocation in Power Systems with Energy Storage
Shapley Value-Based Carbon Emission Responsibility Allocation in Power Systems with Energy Storage
Energy storage systems (ESS) are essential for power system decarbonization, yet their carbon emission responsibilities remain ambiguous under market operations due to their unique...
Forecasting Energy Storage Requirements for Energy Complex with Solar Power Plant and Battery Energy Storage System
Forecasting Energy Storage Requirements for Energy Complex with Solar Power Plant and Battery Energy Storage System
Despite the many advantages of renewable energy sources, the stochastic nature of their generation creates a mismatch between electricity production and demand timing. Without appr...
Switching control strategy for an energy storage system based on multi-level logic judgment
Switching control strategy for an energy storage system based on multi-level logic judgment
Energy storage is a new, flexibly adjusting resource with prospects for broad application in power systems with high proportions of renewable energy integration. However, energy st...
The Energy Storage Technologies in Generation-Integrated Systems (GIES) and Non-GIES
The Energy Storage Technologies in Generation-Integrated Systems (GIES) and Non-GIES
Energy storage technologies can be categorized into generation-integrated systems (GIES) and non-GIES. The effectiveness of an increasing number of non-dispatchable sources of elec...
Research on Grid‐Connected Optimal Operation Mode between Renewable Energy Cluster and Shared Energy Storage on Power Supply Side
Research on Grid‐Connected Optimal Operation Mode between Renewable Energy Cluster and Shared Energy Storage on Power Supply Side
The renewable energy cluster can reduce the total power deviation of renewable energy stations and also bring cooperative benefits to renewable energy stations. Shared energy stora...

Back to Top