Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Development and validation of the Adult Oncology Fall Risk Assessment Scale
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Background Cancer is a significant public health issue. Cancer treatments can alter cognitive function, balance, muscle strength, as well as sensory and organ functions—all of which may increase the risk of falls among oncology patients. This study aims to develop and validate a fall risk assessment scale specifically designed for adult cancer patients, aiming to enhance nurses' ability to identify fall risks in this population and ultimately reduce fall-related incidents
Methods A multi-method and multi-phase design was adopted. Phase one comprised developmental tasks to generate scale items, based on a meta-analysis of fall-related factors in adult cancer patients, case-control studies, and semi-structured interviews, The scale was developed through two rounds of Delphi expert consultation. We conveniently sampled 310 adult cancer patients admitted to cancer-specialized hospitals and oncology departments of general hospitals in Yunnan Province from October to November 2024 were recruited for questionnaire surveys and assessed structural validity, internal reliability, split-half reliability, Data collection included a general information questionnaire, the newly developed Adult Oncology Fall Risk Assessment Scale(AOFRS), and the Morse Fall Scale (MFS). Patients were followed up for three months to monitor fall incidents, allowing for psychometric validation of the scale and determination of risk thresholds.
Results The AOFRS comprises five dimensions (physical function factors, disease-related factors, treatment-related factors, symptom factors, and cognitive factors) with a total of 19 items. The overall Cronbach’s α coefficient was 0.87, and the split-half reliability was 0.82. The scale showed a positive correlation with MFS scores (r=0.51, P<0.01). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for predicting fall risk in adult cancer patients was 0.827, with a cutoff value of 9.5 points, a sensitivity of 0.647, and a specificity of 0.833. The risk stratification of the scale was as follows: <9 points indicated low fall risk; 9~14 points indicated moderate fall risk; and≥14 points indicated high fall risk. Among adult cancer patients, 70% of those classified as high-risk by this scale experienced falls, compared to 36.84% of those classified as high-risk by the MFS, with a statistically significant difference (χ²=3.845, P=0.05).
Conclusions The AOFRS demonstrated good reliability and validity in this study. It exhibited superior predictive performance for fall of adult cancer patients compared to MFS, enabling healthcare providers to accurately evaluate fall risk in adult cancer patients and serving as a valuable reference for implementing targeted preventive interventions.
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Title: Development and validation of the Adult Oncology Fall Risk Assessment Scale
Description:
Abstract
Background Cancer is a significant public health issue.
Cancer treatments can alter cognitive function, balance, muscle strength, as well as sensory and organ functions—all of which may increase the risk of falls among oncology patients.
This study aims to develop and validate a fall risk assessment scale specifically designed for adult cancer patients, aiming to enhance nurses' ability to identify fall risks in this population and ultimately reduce fall-related incidents
Methods A multi-method and multi-phase design was adopted.
Phase one comprised developmental tasks to generate scale items, based on a meta-analysis of fall-related factors in adult cancer patients, case-control studies, and semi-structured interviews, The scale was developed through two rounds of Delphi expert consultation.
We conveniently sampled 310 adult cancer patients admitted to cancer-specialized hospitals and oncology departments of general hospitals in Yunnan Province from October to November 2024 were recruited for questionnaire surveys and assessed structural validity, internal reliability, split-half reliability, Data collection included a general information questionnaire, the newly developed Adult Oncology Fall Risk Assessment Scale(AOFRS), and the Morse Fall Scale (MFS).
Patients were followed up for three months to monitor fall incidents, allowing for psychometric validation of the scale and determination of risk thresholds.
Results The AOFRS comprises five dimensions (physical function factors, disease-related factors, treatment-related factors, symptom factors, and cognitive factors) with a total of 19 items.
The overall Cronbach’s α coefficient was 0.
87, and the split-half reliability was 0.
82.
The scale showed a positive correlation with MFS scores (r=0.
51, P<0.
01).
The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for predicting fall risk in adult cancer patients was 0.
827, with a cutoff value of 9.
5 points, a sensitivity of 0.
647, and a specificity of 0.
833.
The risk stratification of the scale was as follows: <9 points indicated low fall risk; 9~14 points indicated moderate fall risk; and≥14 points indicated high fall risk.
Among adult cancer patients, 70% of those classified as high-risk by this scale experienced falls, compared to 36.
84% of those classified as high-risk by the MFS, with a statistically significant difference (χ²=3.
845, P=0.
05).
Conclusions The AOFRS demonstrated good reliability and validity in this study.
It exhibited superior predictive performance for fall of adult cancer patients compared to MFS, enabling healthcare providers to accurately evaluate fall risk in adult cancer patients and serving as a valuable reference for implementing targeted preventive interventions.
Related Results
Fall Risk Assessment Using Morse Fall Scale and STRATIFY Fall Scale
Fall Risk Assessment Using Morse Fall Scale and STRATIFY Fall Scale
Abstract: The purpose of this study was to identify the value of fall risk assessment using Morse fall scale and STRATIFY fall scale, to identify the sensitivity and specificity of...
Validation in Doctoral Education: Exploring PhD Students’ Perceptions of Belonging to Scaffold Doctoral Identity Work
Validation in Doctoral Education: Exploring PhD Students’ Perceptions of Belonging to Scaffold Doctoral Identity Work
Aim/Purpose: The aim of this article is to make a case of the role of validation in doctoral education. The purpose is to detail findings from three studies which explore PhD stude...
Global Oncology Research and Training Collaborations Led by the National Cancer Institute (NCI)–Designated Cancer Centers: Results From the 2018 NCI/ASCO Global Oncology Survey of NCI-Designated Cancer Centers
Global Oncology Research and Training Collaborations Led by the National Cancer Institute (NCI)–Designated Cancer Centers: Results From the 2018 NCI/ASCO Global Oncology Survey of NCI-Designated Cancer Centers
PURPOSE The National Cancer Institute (NCI)–Designated Cancer Centers (NDCCs) are active in global oncology research and training, leading collaborations that contribute to the evi...
ANALISIS KETERKAITAN KEKERASAN DENGAN PERBUATAN CABUL TERHADAP ANAK
ANALISIS KETERKAITAN KEKERASAN DENGAN PERBUATAN CABUL TERHADAP ANAK
<span id="page3R_mcid85" class="markedContent"><em><span style="left: calc(var(--scale-factor)*85.10px); top: calc(var(--scale-factor)*399.05px); font-size: calc(var...
Perceived Risk of falls among Acute Care Patients
Perceived Risk of falls among Acute Care Patients
Purpose: In an effort to lower the number of falls that occur among hospitalized patients, several facilities have begun introducing various fall prevention programs. However, the ...
National survey on the effect of oncology drug shortages in clinical practice: A Hematology Oncology Pharmacy Association (HOPA) survey.
National survey on the effect of oncology drug shortages in clinical practice: A Hematology Oncology Pharmacy Association (HOPA) survey.
e13609 Background: Drug shortages are a clear and growing challenge. Prominent shortages included oncology medications and supportive care products essential for the care of cance...
Accuracy of medical oncology prognosis for patients with metastatic cancer evaluated for enrollment onto an ongoing randomized clinical trial.
Accuracy of medical oncology prognosis for patients with metastatic cancer evaluated for enrollment onto an ongoing randomized clinical trial.
12063 Background: For patients with metastatic cancer, a key aspect of interdisciplinary care has involved the overall prognosis provided by Medical Oncology, which often dictates...
Blunt Chest Trauma and Chylothorax: A Systematic Review
Blunt Chest Trauma and Chylothorax: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction: Although traumatic chylothorax is predominantly associated with penetrating injuries, instances following blunt trauma, as a rare and challenging condition, ...

