Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Modern Virtue

View through CrossRef
Abstract Mary Wollstonecraft revolutionized ancient traditions of the virtues in modern and Christian modes for feminist and abolitionist aims. Formed by religious traditions of dissent, Wollstonecraft radically altered the garments of the eighteenth-century religious, ethical, political, and aesthetic imagination. She sought to discard sexed virtues, to shed corsets that restrict women’s roles and rights, to expose and break chains of domination, to exchange the vicious finery of the rich for virtue in rags, and to design garb fit for a society in which all participate in defining and cultivating common goods. The virtues and debate about them remain indispensable to modern Christian traditions and democratic societies. When wed, virtues and contestation are among the goods shared in common. Canonical in women and gender studies, feminist philosophy, political science, literary studies, and history, Wollstonecraft is mostly unknown or ignored in contemporary virtue ethics, theology, and religious studies. Modern Virtue seeks to transform prominent narratives in each. Wollstonecraft scholars debate whether theology is ornamental or foundational for her radical arguments. Her use of the wardrobe metaphor provides a fitting alternative. Modern Virtue also challenges influential and competing narratives about the virtues in modernity. These stories render modern virtue a contradiction in terms, common goods obsolete. Modern accounts of the virtues must address this twofold conundrum: systems of domination thwart virtue and mask vice, and the virtues are integral to just sociopolitical transformation. Wollstonecraft’s account does just this.
Oxford University PressNew York
Title: Modern Virtue
Description:
Abstract Mary Wollstonecraft revolutionized ancient traditions of the virtues in modern and Christian modes for feminist and abolitionist aims.
Formed by religious traditions of dissent, Wollstonecraft radically altered the garments of the eighteenth-century religious, ethical, political, and aesthetic imagination.
She sought to discard sexed virtues, to shed corsets that restrict women’s roles and rights, to expose and break chains of domination, to exchange the vicious finery of the rich for virtue in rags, and to design garb fit for a society in which all participate in defining and cultivating common goods.
The virtues and debate about them remain indispensable to modern Christian traditions and democratic societies.
When wed, virtues and contestation are among the goods shared in common.
Canonical in women and gender studies, feminist philosophy, political science, literary studies, and history, Wollstonecraft is mostly unknown or ignored in contemporary virtue ethics, theology, and religious studies.
Modern Virtue seeks to transform prominent narratives in each.
Wollstonecraft scholars debate whether theology is ornamental or foundational for her radical arguments.
Her use of the wardrobe metaphor provides a fitting alternative.
Modern Virtue also challenges influential and competing narratives about the virtues in modernity.
These stories render modern virtue a contradiction in terms, common goods obsolete.
Modern accounts of the virtues must address this twofold conundrum: systems of domination thwart virtue and mask vice, and the virtues are integral to just sociopolitical transformation.
Wollstonecraft’s account does just this.

Related Results

Developmental Virtue Ethics
Developmental Virtue Ethics
Abstract Post-Kohlbergian developmental psychology has recognized the philosophical contribution of virtue ethics to the reclamation of character as an object of stu...
A Critique of Principlism
A Critique of Principlism
Photo by Towfiqu barbhuiya on Unsplash INTRODUCTION Bioethics does not have an explicitly stated and agreed upon means of resolving conflicts between normative theories. As such, b...
An Epistemology for Target Centred Virtue Ethics
An Epistemology for Target Centred Virtue Ethics
Abstract This chapter provides an epistemology for virtue ethics—target-centred virtue epistemology, arguing that we all need the epistemic virtues rather than relyi...
Hutcheson, Francis (1694–1746)
Hutcheson, Francis (1694–1746)
Francis Hutcheson is best known for his contributions to moral theory, but he also contributed to the development of aesthetics. Although his philosophy owes much to John Locke’s e...
The Road to Larisa
The Road to Larisa
Abstract Socrates reluctantly turns from his preferred question of what virtue is to Meno's preferred question of the teachability of virtue – a question that Socrat...
An Aristotelian Critique to Contemporary Virtue Epistemology
An Aristotelian Critique to Contemporary Virtue Epistemology
This paper aims to offer an Aristotelian critique of virtue epistemology, particularly of the way virtue epistemologists use the concept of intellectual virtue in their definitions...
Yan Zhitui’s Concepts of Virtue and Happiness and Thoughts on the Mandate of Heaven
Yan Zhitui’s Concepts of Virtue and Happiness and Thoughts on the Mandate of Heaven
Academic attention has long been accorded to Yan Zhitui and his Family Instructions for the Yan Clan; however, the Confucian philosophical dimensions of his thought remain underexp...
The Struggle Over Definition
The Struggle Over Definition
Abstract Socrates insists on the “priority of definition,” shifting the focus of the discussion away from Meno's preoccupation with how virtue is acquired to the que...

Back to Top