Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Judicial Avoidance
View through CrossRef
This book analyses cases of judicial avoidance: what happens when courts leave some or all of the merits of a case undecided?
It explores examples of justiciability assessments and deferential approaches regarding the decision of another authority and examines legitimacy issues involving judicial avoidance. The reader is presented with answers to two fundamental questions that guide the development of the book:
Is it legitimate to practise judicial avoidance?How could judicial avoidance be practised legitimately?
The conflict of competences, which often emerges in instances of judicial avoidance, is an important book baseline. From this conflict, the book considers and defends the possibility of applying ‘formal balancing’ to provide a clearer structure of the exercise of justiciability and judicial deference. The ‘formal balancing’ methodology is based on Alexy’s principles theory, and its connection with judicial avoidance represents a significant contribution and novel point in constitutional adjudication.
Hart Studies in Constitutional Theory: Volume 4
Title: Judicial Avoidance
Description:
This book analyses cases of judicial avoidance: what happens when courts leave some or all of the merits of a case undecided?
It explores examples of justiciability assessments and deferential approaches regarding the decision of another authority and examines legitimacy issues involving judicial avoidance.
The reader is presented with answers to two fundamental questions that guide the development of the book:
Is it legitimate to practise judicial avoidance?How could judicial avoidance be practised legitimately?
The conflict of competences, which often emerges in instances of judicial avoidance, is an important book baseline.
From this conflict, the book considers and defends the possibility of applying ‘formal balancing’ to provide a clearer structure of the exercise of justiciability and judicial deference.
The ‘formal balancing’ methodology is based on Alexy’s principles theory, and its connection with judicial avoidance represents a significant contribution and novel point in constitutional adjudication.
Hart Studies in Constitutional Theory: Volume 4.
Related Results
Constitutional judicial process
Constitutional judicial process
In the textbook, in accordance with the requirements of the Federal State Educational Standard of Higher Professional Education on the basis of current legislation, judicial practi...
Judicial Decisions on the Law of International Organizations
Judicial Decisions on the Law of International Organizations
Abstract
Concomitant with the rising relevance of international organizations in international affairs, and the general turn to litigation to settle disputes, intern...
Judicial Independence in China
Judicial Independence in China
This volume challenges the conventional wisdom about judicial independence in China and its relationship to economic growth, rule of law, human rights protection, and democracy. Th...
Law enforcement and judicial authorities
Law enforcement and judicial authorities
The textbook has been prepared on the basis of updated Russian legislation, which is important for the organization and functioning of law enforcement and judicial authorities, ens...
Rule of Law Dynamics
Rule of Law Dynamics
This volume explores the various strategies, mechanisms and processes that influence rule of law dynamics across borders and the national/international divide, illuminating the div...
Law-Making Process
Law-Making Process
This book presents a critical, in-depth analysis of the law-making process.
Now in its 9th edition, this leading textbook presents a complete overview of the law-making p...
4 From Comparative Constitutional Law to Comparative Constitutional Studies
4 From Comparative Constitutional Law to Comparative Constitutional Studies
The chapter argues for an interdisciplinary approach to comparative constitutional inquiry that is methodologically and substantively preferable to doctrinal accounts. It suggests ...
Courts in Latin America
Courts in Latin America
To what extent do courts in Latin America protect individual rights and limit governments? This volume answers these fundamental questions by bringing together today's leading scho...