Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Abstract 19115: In-situ Resuscitation Training in Cardiology Procedural Suites

View through CrossRef
Background: Critical Care Advanced Resuscitation Training (CC-ART) prepares critical care teams for emergency situations through training that occurs in a simulated clinical space. Simulated environments do not always accurately mirror the actual clinical environments. Simulations conducted in the actual clinical environment, also known as in-situ simulation, may overcome some of these challenges. Goal: To explored the impact of in situ, ART simulation in a Cardiac Catheterization Lab (CCL) and an Electrophysiology Lab (EPL) on the staff’s experience, confidence, and communication skills. Method: Key leadership and educator team members collaborated on the in-situ simulation set up. Coordination with Simulation Center and Central Supply Department was completed to arrange for delivery of high-fidelity manikins and training crash cart to the site. A team of physicians and nurse educators created CCL and EPL scenarios for the simulations and wrote a simulation evaluation survey for CCL and EPL nurses and technologists who attended. Results: . Simulations were run by both critical care anesthesiologist and clinical nurse educator. Pre-simulation and post-simulation surveys were collected immediately prior to and after the in-situ simulation. 38 staff completed pre and post surveys. Pre-simulation, 50.00% of staff strongly agreed that they were confident in their ability to care for a decompensated patient based on the prior CC-ART training versus, post-simulation, 84.21% strongly agreed. Pre-simulation, 26.32% strongly agreed that the simulation center training was similar to their actual work experience versus post-simulation, 78.95% agreed the in-situ simulation matched their actual work experience. Pre-simulation, 52.63% strongly agreed that they were confident in their ability to communicate their needs during emergencies or code blue situations versus post-simulation 86.84% agreed. Conclusion: This quality improvement project highlights the effectiveness of in situ resuscitation simulation in improving healthcare professionals' confidence, training realism, and communication skills . Analysis of patient outcomes is needed to determine the effectiveness and duration of impact of in situ training for clinical practice.
Title: Abstract 19115: In-situ Resuscitation Training in Cardiology Procedural Suites
Description:
Background: Critical Care Advanced Resuscitation Training (CC-ART) prepares critical care teams for emergency situations through training that occurs in a simulated clinical space.
Simulated environments do not always accurately mirror the actual clinical environments.
Simulations conducted in the actual clinical environment, also known as in-situ simulation, may overcome some of these challenges.
Goal: To explored the impact of in situ, ART simulation in a Cardiac Catheterization Lab (CCL) and an Electrophysiology Lab (EPL) on the staff’s experience, confidence, and communication skills.
Method: Key leadership and educator team members collaborated on the in-situ simulation set up.
Coordination with Simulation Center and Central Supply Department was completed to arrange for delivery of high-fidelity manikins and training crash cart to the site.
A team of physicians and nurse educators created CCL and EPL scenarios for the simulations and wrote a simulation evaluation survey for CCL and EPL nurses and technologists who attended.
Results: .
Simulations were run by both critical care anesthesiologist and clinical nurse educator.
Pre-simulation and post-simulation surveys were collected immediately prior to and after the in-situ simulation.
38 staff completed pre and post surveys.
Pre-simulation, 50.
00% of staff strongly agreed that they were confident in their ability to care for a decompensated patient based on the prior CC-ART training versus, post-simulation, 84.
21% strongly agreed.
Pre-simulation, 26.
32% strongly agreed that the simulation center training was similar to their actual work experience versus post-simulation, 78.
95% agreed the in-situ simulation matched their actual work experience.
Pre-simulation, 52.
63% strongly agreed that they were confident in their ability to communicate their needs during emergencies or code blue situations versus post-simulation 86.
84% agreed.
Conclusion: This quality improvement project highlights the effectiveness of in situ resuscitation simulation in improving healthcare professionals' confidence, training realism, and communication skills .
Analysis of patient outcomes is needed to determine the effectiveness and duration of impact of in situ training for clinical practice.

Related Results

E-071 Organization of a Neurointerventional Fellowship Curriculum
E-071 Organization of a Neurointerventional Fellowship Curriculum
Introduction The field of Neurointervention has attracted some of the very best physicians across the world. Given the interdisciplinary nature of this specialty,...
Readiness of Hong Kong secondary school teachers for teaching cardiopulmonary resuscitation in schools: A questionnaire survey
Readiness of Hong Kong secondary school teachers for teaching cardiopulmonary resuscitation in schools: A questionnaire survey
Background: Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation can improve the survival rate of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Teaching cardiopulmonary resuscitation in schools...
Evaluating the Need for Pediatric Procedural Sedation Training in Pediatric Critical Care Medicine Fellowship*
Evaluating the Need for Pediatric Procedural Sedation Training in Pediatric Critical Care Medicine Fellowship*
Objectives: Pediatric procedural sedation has been increasingly performed by pediatric intensivists over the past decade. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine fellowship gu...
Burn Resuscitation
Burn Resuscitation
Resuscitation of adult patients with burn size greater than 20% total body surface area (TBSA) and pediatric patients with burn size greater than 15% TBSA is essential for early su...

Back to Top