Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Evaluating the Need for Pediatric Procedural Sedation Training in Pediatric Critical Care Medicine Fellowship*
View through CrossRef
Objectives:
Pediatric procedural sedation has been increasingly performed by pediatric intensivists over the past decade. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine fellowship guidelines do not specify how fellows obtain proficiency in pediatric procedural sedation. We sought to survey the state of pediatric procedural sedation training during fellowship and whether fellows thought it was sufficient.
Design:
A 21-question survey gathered data on pediatric procedural sedation training provided to Pediatric Critical Care Medicine fellows. Surveys were sent to fellowship directors with instructions to distribute to second- and third-year fellows or recent graduates. Over 2 months, up to three e-mail reminders were sent to fellowship directors whose program had not completed at least one survey.
Subjects:
Senior fellows and graduates of 65 active Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Pediatric Critical Care Medicine fellowship programs.
Interventions:
None.
Measurements and Main Results:
Sixty-five percent of fellowship programs (42/65) returned at least one response. Ninety senior fellows and 27 recent graduates responded. Of respondents, 38% received pediatric procedural sedation training during the fellowship, and 32% reported mandatory training. Nine percent of programs used simulation. Although 61% who received training felt adequately prepared to perform pediatric procedural sedation, 25% needed additional preceptorship to sedate independently. Nearly one third (31%) reported that completion of a predetermined number of cases was required to sedate independently. Forty-eight percent reported a minimum number of cases was required for hospital credentialing. Nearly 45% were allowed to perform pediatric procedural sedation off the unit after receiving credentials. When asked if inadequate pediatric procedural sedation training would be a deterrent to applying for a position that included pediatric procedural sedation, 8.6% replied yes, 52.6% replied no, and 38.8% replied they were unsure.
Conclusions:
Pediatric procedural sedation lacks a clearly defined training pathway. Most fellows find pediatric procedural sedation a valuable skill set. We propose that all Pediatric Critical Care Medicine fellows receive training that includes pediatric procedural sedation critical incident simulation and cases performed outside the PICU to establish proficiency.
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Title: Evaluating the Need for Pediatric Procedural Sedation Training in Pediatric Critical Care Medicine Fellowship*
Description:
Objectives:
Pediatric procedural sedation has been increasingly performed by pediatric intensivists over the past decade.
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine fellowship guidelines do not specify how fellows obtain proficiency in pediatric procedural sedation.
We sought to survey the state of pediatric procedural sedation training during fellowship and whether fellows thought it was sufficient.
Design:
A 21-question survey gathered data on pediatric procedural sedation training provided to Pediatric Critical Care Medicine fellows.
Surveys were sent to fellowship directors with instructions to distribute to second- and third-year fellows or recent graduates.
Over 2 months, up to three e-mail reminders were sent to fellowship directors whose program had not completed at least one survey.
Subjects:
Senior fellows and graduates of 65 active Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Pediatric Critical Care Medicine fellowship programs.
Interventions:
None.
Measurements and Main Results:
Sixty-five percent of fellowship programs (42/65) returned at least one response.
Ninety senior fellows and 27 recent graduates responded.
Of respondents, 38% received pediatric procedural sedation training during the fellowship, and 32% reported mandatory training.
Nine percent of programs used simulation.
Although 61% who received training felt adequately prepared to perform pediatric procedural sedation, 25% needed additional preceptorship to sedate independently.
Nearly one third (31%) reported that completion of a predetermined number of cases was required to sedate independently.
Forty-eight percent reported a minimum number of cases was required for hospital credentialing.
Nearly 45% were allowed to perform pediatric procedural sedation off the unit after receiving credentials.
When asked if inadequate pediatric procedural sedation training would be a deterrent to applying for a position that included pediatric procedural sedation, 8.
6% replied yes, 52.
6% replied no, and 38.
8% replied they were unsure.
Conclusions:
Pediatric procedural sedation lacks a clearly defined training pathway.
Most fellows find pediatric procedural sedation a valuable skill set.
We propose that all Pediatric Critical Care Medicine fellows receive training that includes pediatric procedural sedation critical incident simulation and cases performed outside the PICU to establish proficiency.
Related Results
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine Fellowship Simulation Use Survey*
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine Fellowship Simulation Use Survey*
Objectives:
Simulation-based education is used in the U.S. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine fellowship programs, yet the prevalence and types of simulation used is unkn...
The Pediatric Anesthesiology Workforce: Projecting Supply and Trends 2015–2035
The Pediatric Anesthesiology Workforce: Projecting Supply and Trends 2015–2035
BACKGROUND:
A workforce analysis was conducted to predict whether the projected future supply of pediatric anesthesiologists is balanced with the requirements of the in...
Pharmacodynamic modeling of moderate sedation and rationale for dosing using midazolam, propofol and alfentanil
Pharmacodynamic modeling of moderate sedation and rationale for dosing using midazolam, propofol and alfentanil
Abstract
Purpose: Regulations have broadened to allow moderate sedation administration for gastrointestinal endoscopy by non-anesthesia personnel. The line betwee...
Pharmacodynamic modeling of moderate sedation and rationale for dosing using midazolam, propofol and alfentanil
Pharmacodynamic modeling of moderate sedation and rationale for dosing using midazolam, propofol and alfentanil
Abstract
Purpose:Regulations have broadened to allow moderate sedation administration for gastrointestinal endoscopy by non-anesthesia personnel. The line between moderate ...
Poster 154: Top Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Fellowship Programs as Perceived by Applicants
Poster 154: Top Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Fellowship Programs as Perceived by Applicants
Objectives: Despite the high volume of orthopaedic sports medicine fellowship applicants and growing interest in the field, fellowship applicants’ attitudes and preferences towards...
Effective Sedation Strategies for Pediatric MRI: A Comprehensive Analysis
Effective Sedation Strategies for Pediatric MRI: A Comprehensive Analysis
This study presents a structured sedation program for pediatric patients undergoing MRI, aiming to optimize safety and resource utilization. A total of 1857 children were included,...
Nasopharyngeal airway-assisted sedation enhances oxygenation and reduces perioperative adverse events in pediatric dental surgery: A comparative clinical study
Nasopharyngeal airway-assisted sedation enhances oxygenation and reduces perioperative adverse events in pediatric dental surgery: A comparative clinical study
Perioperative airway management during pediatric dental procedures remains challenging, particularly in balancing oxygenation stability with procedural safety under intravenous sed...
The Geographic Distribution of Pediatric Anesthesiologists Relative to the US Pediatric Population
The Geographic Distribution of Pediatric Anesthesiologists Relative to the US Pediatric Population
BACKGROUND:
The geographic relationship between pediatric anesthesiologists and the pediatric population has potentially important clinical and policy implications. In ...

