Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Principle of Good Faith in Holding the Third General Meeting of Shareholders for Minority Shareholders

View through CrossRef
The purpose of this study is to examine the principle of good faith , which is a fundamental aspect of corporate governance, which ensures fair treatment for all shareholders, including minority shareholders. This study examines the application of good faith in the third General Meeting of Shareholders (GMS) in relation to the protection of minority shareholders, focusing on Decision Number 389/PDT.P/2019/PN.CKR. This study aims to analyze the court's reasons behind the issuance of the Niet Ontvankelijke Verklaard decision at the third GMS and to evaluate the legal protection mechanisms available to minority shareholders. This study uses a normative juridical approach, by analyzing legal norms and judicial precedents related to corporate governance and shareholder rights. The research findings reveal that minority shareholders often face legal uncertainty and procedural disadvantages in GMS decisions, especially when the principle of good faith is not upheld. The court's rejection of the third GMS application highlights the need for a more comprehensive legal framework to protect the interests of minority shareholders and ensure a fair corporate decision-making process. This study contributes to the corporate governance discourse by emphasizing the importance of procedural fairness and legal certainty in shareholder meetings
Title: Principle of Good Faith in Holding the Third General Meeting of Shareholders for Minority Shareholders
Description:
The purpose of this study is to examine the principle of good faith , which is a fundamental aspect of corporate governance, which ensures fair treatment for all shareholders, including minority shareholders.
This study examines the application of good faith in the third General Meeting of Shareholders (GMS) in relation to the protection of minority shareholders, focusing on Decision Number 389/PDT.
P/2019/PN.
CKR.
This study aims to analyze the court's reasons behind the issuance of the Niet Ontvankelijke Verklaard decision at the third GMS and to evaluate the legal protection mechanisms available to minority shareholders.
This study uses a normative juridical approach, by analyzing legal norms and judicial precedents related to corporate governance and shareholder rights.
The research findings reveal that minority shareholders often face legal uncertainty and procedural disadvantages in GMS decisions, especially when the principle of good faith is not upheld.
The court's rejection of the third GMS application highlights the need for a more comprehensive legal framework to protect the interests of minority shareholders and ensure a fair corporate decision-making process.
This study contributes to the corporate governance discourse by emphasizing the importance of procedural fairness and legal certainty in shareholder meetings.

Related Results

Faith Tweets: Ambient Religious Communication and Microblogging Rituals
Faith Tweets: Ambient Religious Communication and Microblogging Rituals
There’s no reason to think that Jesus wouldn’t have Facebooked or twittered if he came into the world now. Can you imagine his killer status updates? Reverend Schenck, New York, Al...
Faith
Faith
In Faith, the theologian Theo Hobson explores the notion of faith and the role it plays in our lives. He unpacks the concept to ask whether faith is dependent on religion or whethe...
Perlindungan Saham Minoritas PT (Persero) dalam Pembentukan Anak Perusahaan BUMN
Perlindungan Saham Minoritas PT (Persero) dalam Pembentukan Anak Perusahaan BUMN
BUMN (Persero) is regulated in Law Number 19 of 2003 concerning BUMN. In practice BUMN (Persero) is subject to Law Number 40 of 2007, which regulates the rights of shareholders. Ho...
Dividend policy on controlling and non-controlling shareholders: case in Indonesia
Dividend policy on controlling and non-controlling shareholders: case in Indonesia
The purpose of this study is to examine dividend policy on both the controlling and non-controlling shareholders based on assumptions according to theories of life cycle, and free ...
OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE AND DIVIDEND PAYMENT OF NON-FINANCIAL COMPANIES IN SRI LANKA
OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE AND DIVIDEND PAYMENT OF NON-FINANCIAL COMPANIES IN SRI LANKA
Shareholders are the principal of corporations, and they interest more in dividend decisions to receive a good return for their investment. Furthermore, dividend decision is a majo...
Seyyid Kutub’un İman Düşüncesi
Seyyid Kutub’un İman Düşüncesi
Sayyid Qutb’s Thought On FaithrnThe relationship between faith and action is one of the important subjects of kalām science. This issue, which dates back to the Hijri second centur...
Analisis Return Saham pada Perusahaan Holding Company dan Non-Holding Company
Analisis Return Saham pada Perusahaan Holding Company dan Non-Holding Company
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis perbedaan Return, Likuiditas, Leverage, dan Profitabilitas terhadap Return Saham Holding Company dan Non-Holding Company perusahaan. Sam...

Back to Top