Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Dividend policy on controlling and non-controlling shareholders: case in Indonesia
View through CrossRef
The purpose of this study is to examine dividend policy on both the controlling and non-controlling shareholders based on assumptions according to theories of life cycle, and free cash flow.The sample for this study is 241 listed firm in Indonesia Stock Exchange during the period from 2010 to 2015. This study divides the sample based on quartiles and analyzes it by conducting logistic regression with significant rate at 0.05. This study provides the evidences that: (1) firms as dividend payers tend not distribute their dividend for controlling shareholders and non-controlling shareholders while the composition for both shareholders are almost equal; (2) firms as dividend payers also have tendency not to distribute dividend on controlling shareholders when this shareholders have largest percentage of ownership; and (3) firms as dividend payers tend not distribute dividend on non-controlling shareholders while they have lowest retained earnings.The findings imply that life cycle theory and free cash flow theory can explain the behavior of dividending policy on controlling shareholders and non-controlling shareholders depend on their circumstances.The study uses alternative measurement for non-controlling shareholders as this variable together with controlling shareholders are moderating the other independent variables for testing the model of dividend policy.
LLC CPC Business Perspectives
Title: Dividend policy on controlling and non-controlling shareholders: case in Indonesia
Description:
The purpose of this study is to examine dividend policy on both the controlling and non-controlling shareholders based on assumptions according to theories of life cycle, and free cash flow.
The sample for this study is 241 listed firm in Indonesia Stock Exchange during the period from 2010 to 2015.
This study divides the sample based on quartiles and analyzes it by conducting logistic regression with significant rate at 0.
05.
This study provides the evidences that: (1) firms as dividend payers tend not distribute their dividend for controlling shareholders and non-controlling shareholders while the composition for both shareholders are almost equal; (2) firms as dividend payers also have tendency not to distribute dividend on controlling shareholders when this shareholders have largest percentage of ownership; and (3) firms as dividend payers tend not distribute dividend on non-controlling shareholders while they have lowest retained earnings.
The findings imply that life cycle theory and free cash flow theory can explain the behavior of dividending policy on controlling shareholders and non-controlling shareholders depend on their circumstances.
The study uses alternative measurement for non-controlling shareholders as this variable together with controlling shareholders are moderating the other independent variables for testing the model of dividend policy.
Related Results
Profitaility and Dividend Payout Among Construction Companies Listed at the Nairobi Securities Exchange
Profitaility and Dividend Payout Among Construction Companies Listed at the Nairobi Securities Exchange
Being one of the major drivers for investing in stocks, dividend payment has been center of interest among stakeholders mainly investors, management and academic fraternity has ...
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Abstarct
Introduction
Isolated brain hydatid disease (BHD) is an extremely rare form of echinococcosis. A prompt and timely diagnosis is a crucial step in disease management. This ...
The role of dividend yield as agency conflict determinant: case of Indonesia
The role of dividend yield as agency conflict determinant: case of Indonesia
This study provides evidence about how stockholders control insiders using dividend policy to prevent overinvestment. This study observes the dividend yield, market risk, profitabi...
Dividend policy in Indonesia: survey evidence from executives
Dividend policy in Indonesia: survey evidence from executives
PurposeThis study aims to survey managers of dividend‐paying firms listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange (IDX) to learn their views about the factors influencing dividend policy,...
IMPACT OF DIVIDEND POLICY ON STOCK PRICES BEFORE AND AFTER CAPITAL GAIN TAX IMPOSITION: THE CASE OF MANUFACTURING SECTOR OF PAKISTAN
IMPACT OF DIVIDEND POLICY ON STOCK PRICES BEFORE AND AFTER CAPITAL GAIN TAX IMPOSITION: THE CASE OF MANUFACTURING SECTOR OF PAKISTAN
The aim of the study is to find the impact of dividend policy on stock prices before the capital gains tax imposition (2006-2010) and after the capital gains tax imposition (2011-2...
Do discretionary accruals affect firms’ corporate dividend policy? Evidence from France
Do discretionary accruals affect firms’ corporate dividend policy? Evidence from France
Purpose
In financial literature, dividend payout decisions are determined by factors such as debt, liquidity, profitability, size and risk. The purpose of this paper is to identify...
EFFECT OF DIVIDEND POLICY ON FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE OF LISTED DEPOSIT MONEY BANKS IN NIGERIA
EFFECT OF DIVIDEND POLICY ON FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE OF LISTED DEPOSIT MONEY BANKS IN NIGERIA
This study examined the effect of dividend policy on the financial performance of listed deposit money banks in Nigeria between 2015 and 2024. The study adopted Return on Equity (R...
Corporate Governance and Dividend payout Policy: Mediating Role of Leverage. Evidence from Emerging Economy
Corporate Governance and Dividend payout Policy: Mediating Role of Leverage. Evidence from Emerging Economy
This study seeks to explore the relationship between corporate governance and dividend payout policy Mediating role of leverage between corporate governance and dividend payout in ...

