Javascript must be enabled to continue!
OIL SPILL CLEANUP WITH DISPERSANTS: A BOOMED OIL SPILL EXPERIMENT
View through CrossRef
ABSTRACT
Three experimental oil spills of 200, 400, and 200 litres (l) were conducted in October, 1978, in a semiprotected coastal area on Canada's west coast. The surface slicks were restrained with a Bennett inshore oil boom. The spilled oil was chemically dispersed using Corexit 9527, applied as a 10-percent solution in sea water and sprayed from a boat. The dispersed oil was monitored fluorometrically for some hours. Surface and dispersed oil were sampled for chemical analysis.
The highest recorded concentration of dispersed oil was 1 part per million (ppm). After a short time (30 minutes), concentrations around 0.05 ppm were normal, decreasing to background within 5 hours. The concentrations were low compared to those expected for complete dispersion which, as visual observation confirmed, was not achieved.
The dispersed oil did not mix deeper into the water column with the passage of time, in contrast to predicted behaviour and in spite of the lack of a significant vertical density gradient in the sea water. This was attributed to the buoyancy of the dispersed oil droplets and the limited vertical turbulence in the coastal locale of the experiment.
The integrated quantity of oil in the water column decreased more rapidly than either the mean oil concentration of the cloud or the maximum concentration indicating that some of the dispersed oil was rising back to the surface. The surfacing of dispersed oil was confirmed visually during the experiment. The mixing action of the spray boat and breaker boards apparently created large oil droplets that did not form a stable dispersion.
Horizontal diffusion of the dispersed oil was initially more rapid than expected, but the rate of spreading did not increase with time as predicted. The results imply that the scale of diffusion was larger than the scale of turbulence which again can be attributed to the locale of the experiment.
International Oil Spill Conference
Title: OIL SPILL CLEANUP WITH DISPERSANTS: A BOOMED OIL SPILL EXPERIMENT
Description:
ABSTRACT
Three experimental oil spills of 200, 400, and 200 litres (l) were conducted in October, 1978, in a semiprotected coastal area on Canada's west coast.
The surface slicks were restrained with a Bennett inshore oil boom.
The spilled oil was chemically dispersed using Corexit 9527, applied as a 10-percent solution in sea water and sprayed from a boat.
The dispersed oil was monitored fluorometrically for some hours.
Surface and dispersed oil were sampled for chemical analysis.
The highest recorded concentration of dispersed oil was 1 part per million (ppm).
After a short time (30 minutes), concentrations around 0.
05 ppm were normal, decreasing to background within 5 hours.
The concentrations were low compared to those expected for complete dispersion which, as visual observation confirmed, was not achieved.
The dispersed oil did not mix deeper into the water column with the passage of time, in contrast to predicted behaviour and in spite of the lack of a significant vertical density gradient in the sea water.
This was attributed to the buoyancy of the dispersed oil droplets and the limited vertical turbulence in the coastal locale of the experiment.
The integrated quantity of oil in the water column decreased more rapidly than either the mean oil concentration of the cloud or the maximum concentration indicating that some of the dispersed oil was rising back to the surface.
The surfacing of dispersed oil was confirmed visually during the experiment.
The mixing action of the spray boat and breaker boards apparently created large oil droplets that did not form a stable dispersion.
Horizontal diffusion of the dispersed oil was initially more rapid than expected, but the rate of spreading did not increase with time as predicted.
The results imply that the scale of diffusion was larger than the scale of turbulence which again can be attributed to the locale of the experiment.
Related Results
The Case for Oil Spill Dispersants
The Case for Oil Spill Dispersants
Abstract
The subject of oil spill handling represents a new area of technology that is unique in that it encompasses chemical, mechanical and biological disciplin...
Oil Spill Combat Strategy & Lesson Learnt of Balikpapan Spill
Oil Spill Combat Strategy & Lesson Learnt of Balikpapan Spill
Among many discussions on effective response strategies during oil spill response operations at sea, this paper elaborates comprehensive information on oil spill combat strategy an...
Development of the “Next Generation” Chemical Dispersants
Development of the “Next Generation” Chemical Dispersants
ABSTRACT
In order to fully appreciate the development trend for the “next generation” chemical dispersants for oil spills, the current status of this field is briefl...
The M/V New Amity Response: Balancing Safety, Environment, and Commerce During an Emergency Oil Spill Response
The M/V New Amity Response: Balancing Safety, Environment, and Commerce During an Emergency Oil Spill Response
ABSTRACT
On 22 September 2001, a collision occurred between the M/V NEW AMITY and barge, NMS No. 1486 in the Houston Ship Channel. The collision resulted in damage t...
The Effect of Yield Stress on Fracture Fluid Cleanup Nolte, SPE, Dowell
The Effect of Yield Stress on Fracture Fluid Cleanup Nolte, SPE, Dowell
Abstract
This paper evaluates polymer fluid cleanup in general and more specifically why Cotton Valley fracture treatments recover less than one half of the injec...
The Southern Traffic Lane Spill (T/V Command): A Case Study of Spiller Accountability1
The Southern Traffic Lane Spill (T/V Command): A Case Study of Spiller Accountability1
ABSTRACT
On September 24, 1998, the T/V Command had a small spill in San Francisco Bay, California while taking on bunkers in Anchorage Nine. The cause was determine...
California Oil Industry's Solution for Oil Spill Control in the Santa Barbara Channel
California Oil Industry's Solution for Oil Spill Control in the Santa Barbara Channel
Abstract
Since the well-known Santa Barbara oil spill in January, 1969, the oil industry in California has devoted considerable manpower and money toward preventi...
RESPONSE TO THE APRIL 1988 OIL SPILL AT MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA
RESPONSE TO THE APRIL 1988 OIL SPILL AT MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA
ABSTRACT
A spill of approximately 9,400 bbl of San Joaquin Valley crude oil (13.5 API gravity) occurred on April 23, 1988, from the Shell Oil Company Martinez Manufa...

