Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The Southern Traffic Lane Spill (T/V Command): A Case Study of Spiller Accountability1
View through CrossRef
ABSTRACT
On September 24, 1998, the T/V Command had a small spill in San Francisco Bay, California while taking on bunkers in Anchorage Nine. The cause was determined to be due to a small crack in the outer hull plating of the tank. The T/V Command departed on the evening of September 26 after completing temporary repairs required by the Captain of the Port (COTP)/Federal On-Scene Coordinator (FOSC). The next morning, a large 10-mile by 2-mile oil slick was discovered just south of the entrance to San Francisco Bay. This triggered one of the largest, most far-reaching oil spill investigations ever.
Since no one took responsibility for this spill, the U.S. Coast Guard accessed the Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund (OSLTF) and established a Unified Command with the state of California Department of Fish and Game, Office of Spill Prevention and Response (OSPR) to begin immediate cleanup. The Coast Guard and OSPR also began an aggressive joint investigation to track down the spiller. Hundreds of vessels had entered or departed San Francisco Bay during the 5-day window before the spill was discovered. The investigators were able to narrow the search and sample vessels. The Coast Guard Marine Safety Lab (MSL) and OSPR's lab were able to match the spilled oil to the T/V Command,. The Coast Guard tracked down the location of the T/V Command and began the first ever request for high seas boarding of a vessel for an environmental crime. A Coast Guard team from the USCGC Boutwell boarded the T/V Command 200 miles off Guatemala to begin the investigation. A follow-on multiagency team of investigators, led by the Coast Guard again, boarded the vessel in Panama.
In a plea bargain agreement, the T/V Command's operator, master, and chief engineer pled guilty in federal court to criminal charges stemming from the spill on September 27, 1998, remarkably 1 year from the date of the original spill. The operator agreed to pay over $9.4 million dollars in criminal and civil penalties.
This paper and presentation discusses the complexities of this international spill response investigation and events leading up to the settlement.
International Oil Spill Conference
Title: The Southern Traffic Lane Spill (T/V Command): A Case Study of Spiller Accountability1
Description:
ABSTRACT
On September 24, 1998, the T/V Command had a small spill in San Francisco Bay, California while taking on bunkers in Anchorage Nine.
The cause was determined to be due to a small crack in the outer hull plating of the tank.
The T/V Command departed on the evening of September 26 after completing temporary repairs required by the Captain of the Port (COTP)/Federal On-Scene Coordinator (FOSC).
The next morning, a large 10-mile by 2-mile oil slick was discovered just south of the entrance to San Francisco Bay.
This triggered one of the largest, most far-reaching oil spill investigations ever.
Since no one took responsibility for this spill, the U.
S.
Coast Guard accessed the Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund (OSLTF) and established a Unified Command with the state of California Department of Fish and Game, Office of Spill Prevention and Response (OSPR) to begin immediate cleanup.
The Coast Guard and OSPR also began an aggressive joint investigation to track down the spiller.
Hundreds of vessels had entered or departed San Francisco Bay during the 5-day window before the spill was discovered.
The investigators were able to narrow the search and sample vessels.
The Coast Guard Marine Safety Lab (MSL) and OSPR's lab were able to match the spilled oil to the T/V Command,.
The Coast Guard tracked down the location of the T/V Command and began the first ever request for high seas boarding of a vessel for an environmental crime.
A Coast Guard team from the USCGC Boutwell boarded the T/V Command 200 miles off Guatemala to begin the investigation.
A follow-on multiagency team of investigators, led by the Coast Guard again, boarded the vessel in Panama.
In a plea bargain agreement, the T/V Command's operator, master, and chief engineer pled guilty in federal court to criminal charges stemming from the spill on September 27, 1998, remarkably 1 year from the date of the original spill.
The operator agreed to pay over $9.
4 million dollars in criminal and civil penalties.
This paper and presentation discusses the complexities of this international spill response investigation and events leading up to the settlement.
Related Results
The Burden of Road Traffic Injuries: A Global Perspective
The Burden of Road Traffic Injuries: A Global Perspective
Introduction Road Traffic Injury (RTI) pose a significant health challenge. It represents the eighth leading cause of death globally, prompting the UN to designate 2011-2020 as...
Oil Spill Combat Strategy & Lesson Learnt of Balikpapan Spill
Oil Spill Combat Strategy & Lesson Learnt of Balikpapan Spill
Among many discussions on effective response strategies during oil spill response operations at sea, this paper elaborates comprehensive information on oil spill combat strategy an...
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Abstarct
Introduction
Isolated brain hydatid disease (BHD) is an extremely rare form of echinococcosis. A prompt and timely diagnosis is a crucial step in disease management. This ...
Towards Transparency in Oil Spill Management in Africa: Nigeria As A Case Study
Towards Transparency in Oil Spill Management in Africa: Nigeria As A Case Study
ABSTRACT (684687)
Oil spill is an inevitable occurrence in the production, transportation and processing of crude oil. Either in drilling platforms, oil tankers and ...
In-Lane Localization and Ego-Lane Identification Method Based on Highway Lane Endpoints
In-Lane Localization and Ego-Lane Identification Method Based on Highway Lane Endpoints
The low-cost global navigation satellite systems combined with an inertial navigation system (GNSS/INS) used most frequently for vehicle localization show errors up to 10 m, approx...
Cooperative Lane-Change Control Method for Freeways Considering Dynamic Intelligent Connected Dedicated Lanes
Cooperative Lane-Change Control Method for Freeways Considering Dynamic Intelligent Connected Dedicated Lanes
Connected Autonomous Vehicle (CAV) dedicated lanes can spatially eliminate the disturbance from Human-Driven Vehicles (HDVs) and increase the probability of vehicle cooperative pla...
Smart Traffic Control Using Computer Vision
Smart Traffic Control Using Computer Vision
A Smart Traffic Control System using Computer Vision utilizes cameras, image processing techniques, and machine learning algorithms to monitor, analyze, and manage traffic flow aut...
Introduction to Artificial Intelligence in Traffic Systems
Introduction to Artificial Intelligence in Traffic Systems
Traffic management is a pressing challenge in modern societies. The
population of humans is increasing at a substantial pace, and along with that, the
expanse of urban areas and th...

