Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Collaborative advance care planning in palliative care: a randomised controlled trial

View through CrossRef
Objective An effective tool for establishing concordant end-of-life (EOL) care in patients with cancer is advance care planning (ACP). However, various barriers, including psychological obstacles, hamper the access to ACP. Therefore, a new conceptual model combining a psycho-oncological approach with structured ACP was developed. The effectiveness and efficiency of this new concept of collaborative ACP (col-ACP) is evaluated in the present randomised controlled trial in patients with palliative cancer. Methods 277 patients with palliative cancer and their relatives were randomised into three groups (1) collaborative ACP (col-ACP) consisting of a psycho-oncological approach addressing barriers to EOL conversations followed by a standardised ACP procedure, (2) supportive intervention (active control) and (3) standard medical care. Results Patients in the col-ACP group completed advance directives (p<0.01) and healthcare proxies (p<0.01) significantly more often. Additionally, they felt better planned ahead for their future treatment (p<0.01) and were significantly more confident that their relatives were aware of their treatment wishes (p=0.03). In fact, their goals of care were known and highly fulfilled. However, patients’ and caregivers’ quality of life, patients’ stress, depression and peace did not differ between the groups. Conclusions The new, well-received, concept of col-ACP improves readiness and access to ACP and results in more consistent EOL care. Further, even if no direct influence on quality of life could be proven, it supports patients in planning their treatment, making autonomous decisions and regaining self-efficacy in the face of life-limiting cancer. Therefore, a closer interlocking and information exchange between psycho-oncological and ACP services seems to be reasonable. Trial registration number NCT03387436 .
Title: Collaborative advance care planning in palliative care: a randomised controlled trial
Description:
Objective An effective tool for establishing concordant end-of-life (EOL) care in patients with cancer is advance care planning (ACP).
However, various barriers, including psychological obstacles, hamper the access to ACP.
Therefore, a new conceptual model combining a psycho-oncological approach with structured ACP was developed.
The effectiveness and efficiency of this new concept of collaborative ACP (col-ACP) is evaluated in the present randomised controlled trial in patients with palliative cancer.
Methods 277 patients with palliative cancer and their relatives were randomised into three groups (1) collaborative ACP (col-ACP) consisting of a psycho-oncological approach addressing barriers to EOL conversations followed by a standardised ACP procedure, (2) supportive intervention (active control) and (3) standard medical care.
Results Patients in the col-ACP group completed advance directives (p<0.
01) and healthcare proxies (p<0.
01) significantly more often.
Additionally, they felt better planned ahead for their future treatment (p<0.
01) and were significantly more confident that their relatives were aware of their treatment wishes (p=0.
03).
In fact, their goals of care were known and highly fulfilled.
However, patients’ and caregivers’ quality of life, patients’ stress, depression and peace did not differ between the groups.
Conclusions The new, well-received, concept of col-ACP improves readiness and access to ACP and results in more consistent EOL care.
Further, even if no direct influence on quality of life could be proven, it supports patients in planning their treatment, making autonomous decisions and regaining self-efficacy in the face of life-limiting cancer.
Therefore, a closer interlocking and information exchange between psycho-oncological and ACP services seems to be reasonable.
Trial registration number NCT03387436 .

Related Results

Building Primary Palliative Care Capacity Through Education at a National Level: Pallium Canada and its LEAP Courses
Building Primary Palliative Care Capacity Through Education at a National Level: Pallium Canada and its LEAP Courses
Background All the palliative care needs of a population cannot be met by specialist palliative care clinicians and teams alone. Both primary-level and specialist-level palliative ...
Current therapeutic strategies for erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy – literature review and meta-analysis
Current therapeutic strategies for erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy – literature review and meta-analysis
Radical prostatectomy is the most commonly performed treatment option for localised prostate cancer. In the last decades the surgical technique has been improved and modified in or...
Understanding of the term “palliative care”: A Canadian survey
Understanding of the term “palliative care”: A Canadian survey
This article examines the results of two studies conducted in Atlantic Canada to evaluate people’s understanding of palliative care. In Study 1, a sample of adults were asked to re...
Organization of Palliative Care Provision in the Palliative Care Department During War Time
Organization of Palliative Care Provision in the Palliative Care Department During War Time
The city of Kyiv is characterized by a high level (258.6 cases per 100,000 population) of cancer incidence and mortality. The objective: to determine the problem and prospects of p...
Clinical and Socioeconomic Predictors of Palliative Care Utilization
Clinical and Socioeconomic Predictors of Palliative Care Utilization
INTRODUCTION: Palliative care continues to gain recognition among primary care providers, as patients suffering from chronic conditions may benefit from use of this growing service...

Back to Top