Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Clinical and Socioeconomic Predictors of Palliative Care Utilization
View through CrossRef
INTRODUCTION: Palliative care continues to gain recognition among primary care providers, as patients suffering from chronic conditions may benefit from use of this growing service. OBJECTIVES: This single-institution quality improvement study investigates the clinical characteristics and socioeconomic status (SES) of palliative care patients and identifies predictors of palliative care utilization. METHODS: Retrospective chart review was used to compare clinical and SES parameters for three groups of patients: (1) palliative care patients who attended at least one visit since the inception of the University Clinical Health Palliative Care Clinic in Memphis, TN in October 2018 (n = 61), (2) palliative care patients who did not attend any appointments (n = 19), and (3) a randomized group of age-matched primary care patients seen by one provider from May 2018 to May 2019 (n = 36). A Poisson regression model with backward conditional variable selection was used to determine predictors of palliative care utilization. RESULTS: Patients across the three care groups did not differ in demographic parameters. Compared to palliative care-referred non-users and primary care patients, palliative care patients tended to have lower health risk (p < 0.001). Palliative care patients did not differ from primary care patients in socioeconomic status but did differ in comorbidity distribution, having a higher prevalence of cancer (????2 = 14.648, df = 7, p = 0.041). Chance of 10-year survival did not differ across risk categories for palliative care patients but was significantly lower for very high-risk compared to moderate-risk primary care patients (30% vs. 78%, p = 0.019). Significant predictors of palliative care use and their corresponding incidence rate ratios (IRR) were hospital referral (IRR = 1.471; p = 0.039), higher number of prescribed medications (IRR = 1.045; p = 0.003), lower Charlson Comorbidity Index (IRR = 0.907; p = 0.003), and lower systolic blood pressure (IRR = 0.989; p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who are expected to benefit from and of being high utilizers of palliative care may experience greater clinical benefit from earlier referral to this service.
University of Tennessee Health Science Center
Title: Clinical and Socioeconomic Predictors of Palliative Care Utilization
Description:
INTRODUCTION: Palliative care continues to gain recognition among primary care providers, as patients suffering from chronic conditions may benefit from use of this growing service.
OBJECTIVES: This single-institution quality improvement study investigates the clinical characteristics and socioeconomic status (SES) of palliative care patients and identifies predictors of palliative care utilization.
METHODS: Retrospective chart review was used to compare clinical and SES parameters for three groups of patients: (1) palliative care patients who attended at least one visit since the inception of the University Clinical Health Palliative Care Clinic in Memphis, TN in October 2018 (n = 61), (2) palliative care patients who did not attend any appointments (n = 19), and (3) a randomized group of age-matched primary care patients seen by one provider from May 2018 to May 2019 (n = 36).
A Poisson regression model with backward conditional variable selection was used to determine predictors of palliative care utilization.
RESULTS: Patients across the three care groups did not differ in demographic parameters.
Compared to palliative care-referred non-users and primary care patients, palliative care patients tended to have lower health risk (p < 0.
001).
Palliative care patients did not differ from primary care patients in socioeconomic status but did differ in comorbidity distribution, having a higher prevalence of cancer (????2 = 14.
648, df = 7, p = 0.
041).
Chance of 10-year survival did not differ across risk categories for palliative care patients but was significantly lower for very high-risk compared to moderate-risk primary care patients (30% vs.
78%, p = 0.
019).
Significant predictors of palliative care use and their corresponding incidence rate ratios (IRR) were hospital referral (IRR = 1.
471; p = 0.
039), higher number of prescribed medications (IRR = 1.
045; p = 0.
003), lower Charlson Comorbidity Index (IRR = 0.
907; p = 0.
003), and lower systolic blood pressure (IRR = 0.
989; p = 0.
004).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients who are expected to benefit from and of being high utilizers of palliative care may experience greater clinical benefit from earlier referral to this service.
Related Results
Harmonizing Palliative Care: National Survey to Evaluate the Knowledge and Attitude of Emergency Physicians towards Palliative Care
Harmonizing Palliative Care: National Survey to Evaluate the Knowledge and Attitude of Emergency Physicians towards Palliative Care
Background and Aim
Although the challenges of integrating palliative care practices across care settings are real and well recognized until now little is known ab...
Abstract C001: Racial and hospital factors affecting palliative care utilization in advanced cancer: An analysis of the NIS database
Abstract C001: Racial and hospital factors affecting palliative care utilization in advanced cancer: An analysis of the NIS database
Abstract
Background:
Palliative care significantly enhances the quality of life for patients with advanced cancer by addressing ...
Specialised Palliative Care in Day Clinic, Hospital Unit or at Home: Which for Whom and When? A Retrospective Routine Data Analysis
Specialised Palliative Care in Day Clinic, Hospital Unit or at Home: Which for Whom and When? A Retrospective Routine Data Analysis
Background:
Palliative care units and specialised palliative home care teams are well established in many countries. Palliative day-care clinics, however, are n...
Building Primary Palliative Care Capacity Through Education at a National Level: Pallium Canada and its LEAP Courses
Building Primary Palliative Care Capacity Through Education at a National Level: Pallium Canada and its LEAP Courses
Background All the palliative care needs of a population cannot be met by specialist palliative care clinicians and teams alone. Both primary-level and specialist-level palliative ...
Does Inpatient Palliative Care Facilitate Home-Based Palliative Care Postdischarge? A Retrospective Cohort Study
Does Inpatient Palliative Care Facilitate Home-Based Palliative Care Postdischarge? A Retrospective Cohort Study
Introduction:
Evidence of the impact of inpatient palliative care on receiving home-based palliative care remains limited.
...
Dementia patients in palliative care according to data from the German National Hospice and Palliative Care Register (2009–2021)
Dementia patients in palliative care according to data from the German National Hospice and Palliative Care Register (2009–2021)
Abstract
Background
People with dementia are less in focus of palliative care research than other patient groups even though the awareness of their ...
Palliative care nurse champions’ views on their role and impact: a qualitative interview study among hospital and home care nurses
Palliative care nurse champions’ views on their role and impact: a qualitative interview study among hospital and home care nurses
Abstract
Background
One of the strategies to promote the quality of palliative care in non-specialised settings is the appointment of palliative car...
Understanding of the term “palliative care”: A Canadian survey
Understanding of the term “palliative care”: A Canadian survey
This article examines the results of two studies conducted in Atlantic Canada to evaluate people’s understanding of palliative care. In Study 1, a sample of adults were asked to re...

