Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Clinical and Socioeconomic Predictors of Palliative Care Utilization
View through CrossRef
INTRODUCTION: Palliative care continues to gain recognition among primary care providers, as patients suffering from chronic conditions may benefit from use of this growing service. OBJECTIVES: This single-institution quality improvement study investigates the clinical characteristics and socioeconomic status (SES) of palliative care patients and identifies predictors of palliative care utilization. METHODS: Retrospective chart review was used to compare clinical and SES parameters for three groups of patients: (1) palliative care patients who attended at least one visit since the inception of the University Clinical Health Palliative Care Clinic in Memphis, TN in October 2018 (n = 61), (2) palliative care patients who did not attend any appointments (n = 19), and (3) a randomized group of age-matched primary care patients seen by one provider from May 2018 to May 2019 (n = 36). A Poisson regression model with backward conditional variable selection was used to determine predictors of palliative care utilization. RESULTS: Patients across the three care groups did not differ in demographic parameters. Compared to palliative care-referred non-users and primary care patients, palliative care patients tended to have lower health risk (p < 0.001). Palliative care patients did not differ from primary care patients in socioeconomic status but did differ in comorbidity distribution, having a higher prevalence of cancer (????2 = 14.648, df = 7, p = 0.041). Chance of 10-year survival did not differ across risk categories for palliative care patients but was significantly lower for very high-risk compared to moderate-risk primary care patients (30% vs. 78%, p = 0.019). Significant predictors of palliative care use and their corresponding incidence rate ratios (IRR) were hospital referral (IRR = 1.471; p = 0.039), higher number of prescribed medications (IRR = 1.045; p = 0.003), lower Charlson Comorbidity Index (IRR = 0.907; p = 0.003), and lower systolic blood pressure (IRR = 0.989; p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who are expected to benefit from and of being high utilizers of palliative care may experience greater clinical benefit from earlier referral to this service.
University of Tennessee Health Science Center
Title: Clinical and Socioeconomic Predictors of Palliative Care Utilization
Description:
INTRODUCTION: Palliative care continues to gain recognition among primary care providers, as patients suffering from chronic conditions may benefit from use of this growing service.
OBJECTIVES: This single-institution quality improvement study investigates the clinical characteristics and socioeconomic status (SES) of palliative care patients and identifies predictors of palliative care utilization.
METHODS: Retrospective chart review was used to compare clinical and SES parameters for three groups of patients: (1) palliative care patients who attended at least one visit since the inception of the University Clinical Health Palliative Care Clinic in Memphis, TN in October 2018 (n = 61), (2) palliative care patients who did not attend any appointments (n = 19), and (3) a randomized group of age-matched primary care patients seen by one provider from May 2018 to May 2019 (n = 36).
A Poisson regression model with backward conditional variable selection was used to determine predictors of palliative care utilization.
RESULTS: Patients across the three care groups did not differ in demographic parameters.
Compared to palliative care-referred non-users and primary care patients, palliative care patients tended to have lower health risk (p < 0.
001).
Palliative care patients did not differ from primary care patients in socioeconomic status but did differ in comorbidity distribution, having a higher prevalence of cancer (????2 = 14.
648, df = 7, p = 0.
041).
Chance of 10-year survival did not differ across risk categories for palliative care patients but was significantly lower for very high-risk compared to moderate-risk primary care patients (30% vs.
78%, p = 0.
019).
Significant predictors of palliative care use and their corresponding incidence rate ratios (IRR) were hospital referral (IRR = 1.
471; p = 0.
039), higher number of prescribed medications (IRR = 1.
045; p = 0.
003), lower Charlson Comorbidity Index (IRR = 0.
907; p = 0.
003), and lower systolic blood pressure (IRR = 0.
989; p = 0.
004).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients who are expected to benefit from and of being high utilizers of palliative care may experience greater clinical benefit from earlier referral to this service.
Related Results
Specialised Palliative Care in Day Clinic, Hospital Unit or at Home: Which for Whom and When? A Retrospective Routine Data Analysis
Specialised Palliative Care in Day Clinic, Hospital Unit or at Home: Which for Whom and When? A Retrospective Routine Data Analysis
Background:
Palliative care units and specialised palliative home care teams are well established in many countries. Palliative day-care clinics, however, are n...
Building Primary Palliative Care Capacity Through Education at a National Level: Pallium Canada and its LEAP Courses
Building Primary Palliative Care Capacity Through Education at a National Level: Pallium Canada and its LEAP Courses
Background All the palliative care needs of a population cannot be met by specialist palliative care clinicians and teams alone. Both primary-level and specialist-level palliative ...
Dementia patients in palliative care according to data from the German National Hospice and Palliative Care Register (2009–2021)
Dementia patients in palliative care according to data from the German National Hospice and Palliative Care Register (2009–2021)
Abstract
Background
People with dementia are less in focus of palliative care research than other patient groups even though the awareness of their ...
Palliative care nurse champions’ views on their role and impact: a qualitative interview study among hospital and home care nurses
Palliative care nurse champions’ views on their role and impact: a qualitative interview study among hospital and home care nurses
Abstract
Background
One of the strategies to promote the quality of palliative care in non-specialised settings is the appointment of palliative car...
Understanding of the term “palliative care”: A Canadian survey
Understanding of the term “palliative care”: A Canadian survey
This article examines the results of two studies conducted in Atlantic Canada to evaluate people’s understanding of palliative care. In Study 1, a sample of adults were asked to re...
Organization of Palliative Care Provision in the Palliative Care Department During War Time
Organization of Palliative Care Provision in the Palliative Care Department During War Time
The city of Kyiv is characterized by a high level (258.6 cases per 100,000 population) of cancer incidence and mortality.
The objective: to determine the problem and prospects of p...
Knowledge About Palliative Care in Cancer Patients
Knowledge About Palliative Care in Cancer Patients
Abstract
Background: Patient awareness plays an important role in integrating palliative care into the patient care process. Lack of awareness can create a negative attitud...
From Inpatient Care to Palliative Care: Socio-demographic Characterization and Waiting Times of Referred Oncology Patients
From Inpatient Care to Palliative Care: Socio-demographic Characterization and Waiting Times of Referred Oncology Patients
Abstract
Introduction:
Timely access to specialized palliative care significantly improves quality of life and symptom control ...

