Javascript must be enabled to continue!
APPEAL OF JUDICIAL RULINGS
View through CrossRef
The principle regarding judicial rulings issued by judges is that they must be respected and fully complied with, whether by both parties to the dispute: the plaintiff and the defendant, or by others; because this leads to stability and consistency in the legal positions regarding which the rulings were issued. However, the rulings issued by judges are rulings issued by human beings who are not infallible, and therefore the possibility of error in judicial rulings exists. There must be a way to correct errors that may occur in judicial rulings. This occurs through a request by one of the parties or their representative to reconsider the case subject to the ruling. This is known as an appeal of the ruling. This research paper examines the appeal of judicial rulings, its purpose, its legitimacy, the controls and conditions that must be met in order toappeal a judicial ruling, and the consequences thereof.
The researcher used the descriptive analytical approach, by tracing the scientific material from its original sources and modern references, collecting and classifying it, then analyzing the scientific material that was classified with a jurisprudential analysis, in order to achieve the research objectives and extract the expected results.
Jana Publication and Research LLP
Title: APPEAL OF JUDICIAL RULINGS
Description:
The principle regarding judicial rulings issued by judges is that they must be respected and fully complied with, whether by both parties to the dispute: the plaintiff and the defendant, or by others; because this leads to stability and consistency in the legal positions regarding which the rulings were issued.
However, the rulings issued by judges are rulings issued by human beings who are not infallible, and therefore the possibility of error in judicial rulings exists.
There must be a way to correct errors that may occur in judicial rulings.
This occurs through a request by one of the parties or their representative to reconsider the case subject to the ruling.
This is known as an appeal of the ruling.
This research paper examines the appeal of judicial rulings, its purpose, its legitimacy, the controls and conditions that must be met in order toappeal a judicial ruling, and the consequences thereof.
The researcher used the descriptive analytical approach, by tracing the scientific material from its original sources and modern references, collecting and classifying it, then analyzing the scientific material that was classified with a jurisprudential analysis, in order to achieve the research objectives and extract the expected results.
Related Results
The Role of the Judiciary in Constitutional Interpretation in Pakistan
The Role of the Judiciary in Constitutional Interpretation in Pakistan
This study examines the evolving role of the judiciary in Pakistan in interpreting the Constitution, exploring how the courts have come to terms with their position as the primary ...
Avoiding Scandals Through Tax Rulings Transparency
Avoiding Scandals Through Tax Rulings Transparency
In 2014, the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists broke the “LuxLeaks” scandal, revealing numerous tax rulings that the press termed “sweetheart deals” granted to ...
Exploring Muslim consumers' information sources for fatwa rulings on products and behaviors
Exploring Muslim consumers' information sources for fatwa rulings on products and behaviors
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to explore the nature of fatwa and the dissemination of fatwa rulings among Muslim consumers using two studies. Results from these studies show ...
Judicial Review Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi: Judicial Activism vs. Judicial Restraint dalam Perspektif Kebebasan Kehakiman
Judicial Review Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi: Judicial Activism vs. Judicial Restraint dalam Perspektif Kebebasan Kehakiman
The discourse between the application of judicial activism or judicial restraint has become a hot issue of judicial review authority where recently the Constitutional Court through...
JUDICIAL CONCILIATION AND JUDICIAL CONCILIATOR
JUDICIAL CONCILIATION AND JUDICIAL CONCILIATOR
The article analyzes the provisions of procedural legislation on judicial conciliation and judicial conciliators. The authors review the provisions of several draft laws that conta...
Pitching Outside the DSU: Preliminary Rulings in WTO Dispute Settlement
Pitching Outside the DSU: Preliminary Rulings in WTO Dispute Settlement
It has become the norm for WTO panels to issue rulings on preliminary issues such as jurisdiction, terms of reference and other related issues pertaining to a dispute upon the requ...
Judicial Review in Nepal
Judicial Review in Nepal
Judicial Review of Laws and Administrative decisions in question is an integral exercise of democratic practice. As one of the organs of the government Judiciary should not only vi...
Perbandingan Sistem Hukum Antara Indonesia dan Malaysia Terkait Peninjauan Kembali
Perbandingan Sistem Hukum Antara Indonesia dan Malaysia Terkait Peninjauan Kembali
Judicial review serves as one of the major backbones of the judicial system in any democratic polity. It ensures the consolidation of democracy because it serves as the principal m...

