Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Judicial Review in Nepal

View through CrossRef
Judicial Review of Laws and Administrative decisions in question is an integral exercise of democratic practice. As one of the organs of the government Judiciary should not only view Judicial Review as it's right to keep check on other organs of government but should also remember it as one of the most important duty that it is called upon. In this sense the paper deals with the pertinent issue of Judicial Review in Nepalese context. In the first part of the paper (Background) the basic premise over which the philosophy of Judicial Review stands has been discussed. In this part the concept of separation of power among organs of government and their mutual check on each other has been laid as the foundation on which Judicial Review lies. Then in the second part (Judicial Review) of the paper concept and the importance of Judicial Review has been discussed and with that a very brief history of Judicial Review and with that the Constitutional provision of Judicial Review has been mentioned. After that the Judicial attitude towards Judicial Review and then the scope of Judicial review, i.e. recent trends in Judiciary in developing the boundary of issues falling within the scope of judicial review has been discussed. Similarly with the ever expanding scope, in the next part the paper discusses the limitations of Judicial Review and lays the probable grounds on which the extra ordinary jurisdiction of supreme Court that of Judicial Review cannot be invoked. With above philosophical and theoretical background the paper in its core presents the analysis of Judicial Survey of few selected cases filed in the Supreme Court on the ground that the Laws questioned in each case were Unconstitutional. Furthermore the paper surveys only those decisions that declared the impugned law, as raised in the respective cases, ultra vires. In this regard, for the purpose of this paper only the laws questioned on the ground that those laws violated the Right of Equality of the citizen has been examined. And at last in Conclusion the paper tries to draw the importance of Judicial Review as an effective means of checking executive and legislature and protecting and expanding the Right to equality of the citizens.
Elsevier BV
Title: Judicial Review in Nepal
Description:
Judicial Review of Laws and Administrative decisions in question is an integral exercise of democratic practice.
As one of the organs of the government Judiciary should not only view Judicial Review as it's right to keep check on other organs of government but should also remember it as one of the most important duty that it is called upon.
In this sense the paper deals with the pertinent issue of Judicial Review in Nepalese context.
In the first part of the paper (Background) the basic premise over which the philosophy of Judicial Review stands has been discussed.
In this part the concept of separation of power among organs of government and their mutual check on each other has been laid as the foundation on which Judicial Review lies.
Then in the second part (Judicial Review) of the paper concept and the importance of Judicial Review has been discussed and with that a very brief history of Judicial Review and with that the Constitutional provision of Judicial Review has been mentioned.
After that the Judicial attitude towards Judicial Review and then the scope of Judicial review, i.
e.
recent trends in Judiciary in developing the boundary of issues falling within the scope of judicial review has been discussed.
Similarly with the ever expanding scope, in the next part the paper discusses the limitations of Judicial Review and lays the probable grounds on which the extra ordinary jurisdiction of supreme Court that of Judicial Review cannot be invoked.
With above philosophical and theoretical background the paper in its core presents the analysis of Judicial Survey of few selected cases filed in the Supreme Court on the ground that the Laws questioned in each case were Unconstitutional.
Furthermore the paper surveys only those decisions that declared the impugned law, as raised in the respective cases, ultra vires.
In this regard, for the purpose of this paper only the laws questioned on the ground that those laws violated the Right of Equality of the citizen has been examined.
And at last in Conclusion the paper tries to draw the importance of Judicial Review as an effective means of checking executive and legislature and protecting and expanding the Right to equality of the citizens.

Related Results

The Role of the Judiciary in Constitutional Interpretation in Pakistan
The Role of the Judiciary in Constitutional Interpretation in Pakistan
This study examines the evolving role of the judiciary in Pakistan in interpreting the Constitution, exploring how the courts have come to terms with their position as the primary ...
Judicial Review Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi: Judicial Activism vs. Judicial Restraint dalam Perspektif Kebebasan Kehakiman
Judicial Review Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi: Judicial Activism vs. Judicial Restraint dalam Perspektif Kebebasan Kehakiman
The discourse between the application of judicial activism or judicial restraint has become a hot issue of judicial review authority where recently the Constitutional Court through...
Perbandingan Sistem Hukum Antara Indonesia dan Malaysia Terkait Peninjauan Kembali
Perbandingan Sistem Hukum Antara Indonesia dan Malaysia Terkait Peninjauan Kembali
Judicial review serves as one of the major backbones of the judicial system in any democratic polity. It ensures the consolidation of democracy because it serves as the principal m...
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical activi...
Judicial Restraint Law Politics of the Constitutional Court Against Parliamentary Threshold: A Comparison of Indonesia and Philippines
Judicial Restraint Law Politics of the Constitutional Court Against Parliamentary Threshold: A Comparison of Indonesia and Philippines
ABSTRACT The Purpose of this Research is to examine 1) Legal construction of the Judicial Review of Parliamentary Threshold No. 44/PUUXV/2017 and No. 62/PUU-XXII/2024 on Judicial R...
Hinduism in Nepal
Hinduism in Nepal
Nepal held the unique status of being the world’s only Hindu kingdom until the collapse of its centuries-old Hindu monarchy in 2006. The idea of Nepal as the asal Hindustan, or “pu...
JUDICIAL CONCILIATION AND JUDICIAL CONCILIATOR
JUDICIAL CONCILIATION AND JUDICIAL CONCILIATOR
The article analyzes the provisions of procedural legislation on judicial conciliation and judicial conciliators. The authors review the provisions of several draft laws that conta...

Back to Top