Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Physicians’ perspectives on estimating and communicating prognosis in palliative care: a cross-sectional survey

View through CrossRef
BackgroundAdvance care planning (ACP) can help to enhance the care of patients with limited life expectancy. Despite physicians’ key role in ACP, the ways in which physicians estimate and communicate prognosis can be improved.AimTo determine how physicians in different care settings self-assess their performance in estimating and communicating prognosis to patients in palliative care, and how they perceive their communication with other physicians about patients’ poor prognosis.Design & settingA survey study was performed among a random sample of GPs, hospital physicians (HPs), and nursing home physicians (NHPs) in the southwest of the Netherlands (n = 2212).MethodA questionnaire was developed that had three versions for GPs, HPs, and NHPs. Each specialism filled in an appropriate version.ResultsA total of 547 physicians participated: 259 GPs, 205 HPs, and 83 NHPs. In the study, 61.1% of physicians indicated being able to adequately estimate whether a patient will die within 1 year, which was associated with use of the Surprise Question (odds ratio [OR] = 1.65, P = 0.042). In the case of a prognosis of <1 year, 75.0% of physicians indicated that they communicate with patients about preferences regarding treatment and care, which was associated with physicians being trained in palliative care (OR = 2.02, P=0.007). In cases where patients with poor prognosis are discharged after hospital admission, 83.4% of HPs indicated that they inform GPs about these patients’ preferences compared with 29.0% of GPs, and 21.7% of NHPs, who indicated that they are usually adequately informed about the preferences.ConclusionThe majority of physicians indicated that they believe they can adequately estimate patients’ limited life expectancy and that they discuss patients’ preferences for care. However, more physicians should be trained in communicating about patients’ poor prognosis and care preferences.
Title: Physicians’ perspectives on estimating and communicating prognosis in palliative care: a cross-sectional survey
Description:
BackgroundAdvance care planning (ACP) can help to enhance the care of patients with limited life expectancy.
Despite physicians’ key role in ACP, the ways in which physicians estimate and communicate prognosis can be improved.
AimTo determine how physicians in different care settings self-assess their performance in estimating and communicating prognosis to patients in palliative care, and how they perceive their communication with other physicians about patients’ poor prognosis.
Design & settingA survey study was performed among a random sample of GPs, hospital physicians (HPs), and nursing home physicians (NHPs) in the southwest of the Netherlands (n = 2212).
MethodA questionnaire was developed that had three versions for GPs, HPs, and NHPs.
Each specialism filled in an appropriate version.
ResultsA total of 547 physicians participated: 259 GPs, 205 HPs, and 83 NHPs.
In the study, 61.
1% of physicians indicated being able to adequately estimate whether a patient will die within 1 year, which was associated with use of the Surprise Question (odds ratio [OR] = 1.
65, P = 0.
042).
In the case of a prognosis of <1 year, 75.
0% of physicians indicated that they communicate with patients about preferences regarding treatment and care, which was associated with physicians being trained in palliative care (OR = 2.
02, P=0.
007).
In cases where patients with poor prognosis are discharged after hospital admission, 83.
4% of HPs indicated that they inform GPs about these patients’ preferences compared with 29.
0% of GPs, and 21.
7% of NHPs, who indicated that they are usually adequately informed about the preferences.
ConclusionThe majority of physicians indicated that they believe they can adequately estimate patients’ limited life expectancy and that they discuss patients’ preferences for care.
However, more physicians should be trained in communicating about patients’ poor prognosis and care preferences.

Related Results

Building Primary Palliative Care Capacity Through Education at a National Level: Pallium Canada and its LEAP Courses
Building Primary Palliative Care Capacity Through Education at a National Level: Pallium Canada and its LEAP Courses
Background All the palliative care needs of a population cannot be met by specialist palliative care clinicians and teams alone. Both primary-level and specialist-level palliative ...
A survey of palliative care domains and the palliative care provision confidence of Thai family practitioners
A survey of palliative care domains and the palliative care provision confidence of Thai family practitioners
Abstract Introduction Despite continuously growing, palliative care in Thailand still needs further development. Many family physicians provide vari...
Understanding of the term “palliative care”: A Canadian survey
Understanding of the term “palliative care”: A Canadian survey
This article examines the results of two studies conducted in Atlantic Canada to evaluate people’s understanding of palliative care. In Study 1, a sample of adults were asked to re...
Organization of Palliative Care Provision in the Palliative Care Department During War Time
Organization of Palliative Care Provision in the Palliative Care Department During War Time
The city of Kyiv is characterized by a high level (258.6 cases per 100,000 population) of cancer incidence and mortality. The objective: to determine the problem and prospects of p...
Clinical and Socioeconomic Predictors of Palliative Care Utilization
Clinical and Socioeconomic Predictors of Palliative Care Utilization
INTRODUCTION: Palliative care continues to gain recognition among primary care providers, as patients suffering from chronic conditions may benefit from use of this growing service...

Back to Top