Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Appendectomy Open Versus Laparoscopic in Developing World Scenario

View through CrossRef
Background: Laparoscopic surgery is an expanding field which is recognized as gold standard for cholecystectomy, it is being increasingly used by many surgical subspecialties with advantage of being minimal invasive and being both diagnostic and therapeutic. Objectives: This study was done to evaluate the feasibility of laparoscopic appendectomy in a developing world scenario.Material and Methods: This observational cross-sectional study was conducted under department of general surgery from September 2019 to August 2021. The patients presenting to the ER department were evaluated based on Alvarado score. Alternate patients underwent laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) and open appendectomy (OA). Based upon clinical and imaging signs of acute appendicitis (i.e. Alvarado score of 7 or more) and consent to be the part of study, were used as inclusion criteria, while pregnancy, patients who could not tolerate increased intra-abdominal pressure/prolonged anesthesia, patients under 10 years of age and patients with evidence of appendicular mass formation were excluded from the study. The standard surgical techniques were performed for both groups and the patients were followed up in immediate post-operative period, at 6 months and one year. Results: The parameters observed were duration of surgery average 25 minutes (range 15-50 mins) for OA and 70 minutes (range 40-90 mins) for LA (P-Value 1.41E-70), return to preoperative activity level was 13 days (range 10-17 days) for OA and 10 days (range 9-14 days) for LA (P-Value 6.69034E-22), and average cost for OA was PKR 35279.00 while for LA was PKR 72168.00 (P-Value 1.24442E-60). Remaining parameters were not significantly different.Conclusion: The evidence available clearly demonstrates that laparoscopic appendectomy is superior to open appendectomy in terms of hospital stay, post-operative pain and return to work, however in a few situations the procedure needs to be converted therefore the surgeon must be conversant with open appendectomy for complicated case. Moreover, cost is a major factor determining the choice of procedure specially in the developing countries. Keywords: Appendectomy, Developing world, Laparoscopic Appendectomy, Open versus Laparoscopic Appendectomy, Pakistan,
Title: Appendectomy Open Versus Laparoscopic in Developing World Scenario
Description:
Background: Laparoscopic surgery is an expanding field which is recognized as gold standard for cholecystectomy, it is being increasingly used by many surgical subspecialties with advantage of being minimal invasive and being both diagnostic and therapeutic.
Objectives: This study was done to evaluate the feasibility of laparoscopic appendectomy in a developing world scenario.
Material and Methods: This observational cross-sectional study was conducted under department of general surgery from September 2019 to August 2021.
The patients presenting to the ER department were evaluated based on Alvarado score.
Alternate patients underwent laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) and open appendectomy (OA).
Based upon clinical and imaging signs of acute appendicitis (i.
e.
Alvarado score of 7 or more) and consent to be the part of study, were used as inclusion criteria, while pregnancy, patients who could not tolerate increased intra-abdominal pressure/prolonged anesthesia, patients under 10 years of age and patients with evidence of appendicular mass formation were excluded from the study.
The standard surgical techniques were performed for both groups and the patients were followed up in immediate post-operative period, at 6 months and one year.
Results: The parameters observed were duration of surgery average 25 minutes (range 15-50 mins) for OA and 70 minutes (range 40-90 mins) for LA (P-Value 1.
41E-70), return to preoperative activity level was 13 days (range 10-17 days) for OA and 10 days (range 9-14 days) for LA (P-Value 6.
69034E-22), and average cost for OA was PKR 35279.
00 while for LA was PKR 72168.
00 (P-Value 1.
24442E-60).
Remaining parameters were not significantly different.
Conclusion: The evidence available clearly demonstrates that laparoscopic appendectomy is superior to open appendectomy in terms of hospital stay, post-operative pain and return to work, however in a few situations the procedure needs to be converted therefore the surgeon must be conversant with open appendectomy for complicated case.
Moreover, cost is a major factor determining the choice of procedure specially in the developing countries.
Keywords: Appendectomy, Developing world, Laparoscopic Appendectomy, Open versus Laparoscopic Appendectomy, Pakistan,.

Related Results

<b>COMAPRISON OF OUTCOMES IN LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY VS OPEN APPENDECTOMY</b>
<b>COMAPRISON OF OUTCOMES IN LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY VS OPEN APPENDECTOMY</b>
Introduction: Acute appendicitis is a surgical emergency that is amongst the most frequently performed all over the globe, with open appendectomy being the conventional treatment. ...
OPEN VERSUS LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY: A COMPARATIVE STUDY
OPEN VERSUS LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY: A COMPARATIVE STUDY
Background: Acute appendicitis is one of the most frequent surgical emergencies globally, with appendectomy remaining the definitive treatment. Advances in minimally invasive surge...
Comparison between Open versus Laparoscopic Appendectomy
Comparison between Open versus Laparoscopic Appendectomy
Objective: To compare the outcomes of laparoscopic appendectomy and open appendectomy for treatment of acute appendicitis. Study Design: Randomized control trial. Place and duratio...
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LATERALIZED TRANSVERSE INCISION APPENDECTOMY VERSUS LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LATERALIZED TRANSVERSE INCISION APPENDECTOMY VERSUS LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY
Objectives: The objective of this study were to compare the effectiveness of lateral transverse cosmetic incision (LTCI) versus laparoscopic appendectomy in terms of operative and ...
Appendicitis: Clinical implications in negative appendectomy
Appendicitis: Clinical implications in negative appendectomy
ABSTRACT Objective: Appendectomy is one of the most common surgical emergencies for appendicitis. Despite the improvemen...
Laparoscopic Versus Open Pediatric Splenectomy for Massive Splenomegaly
Laparoscopic Versus Open Pediatric Splenectomy for Massive Splenomegaly
Laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) has rapidly evolved into the technique of choice compared with open splenectomy (OS) because of the advantages of the minimally invasive approach. Spl...
A Study of Comparison of Post-operative Pain in Open and Laparoscopic Appendectomy
A Study of Comparison of Post-operative Pain in Open and Laparoscopic Appendectomy
Objectives: To compare post-operative pain, analgesic requirements, complications, hospital stay, and recovery outcomes between laparoscopic and open appendectomy. Methodology: Thi...

Back to Top