Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Vertical Egalitarianism

View through CrossRef
This chapter examines liberalism (classical and contemporary) as a paradigm of “vertical” egalitarianism. It shows how, from a liberal perspective, the distinction between vertical and horizontal egalitarianism corresponds loosely to the distinction between coercive principles and ethical ideals. The loose correspondence consists in the fact that most of what goes on between a government and the citizens over whom it claims authority involves the possibility of (formal) coercion. And the converse tends to be true about horizontal relationships: most of what takes place in civil society—between or among citizens—falls outside the purview of legitimate coercive interference. Beyond respecting the formal rights of others, horizontal relationships tend to be markedly free of formal coercion.
Title: Vertical Egalitarianism
Description:
This chapter examines liberalism (classical and contemporary) as a paradigm of “vertical” egalitarianism.
It shows how, from a liberal perspective, the distinction between vertical and horizontal egalitarianism corresponds loosely to the distinction between coercive principles and ethical ideals.
The loose correspondence consists in the fact that most of what goes on between a government and the citizens over whom it claims authority involves the possibility of (formal) coercion.
And the converse tends to be true about horizontal relationships: most of what takes place in civil society—between or among citizens—falls outside the purview of legitimate coercive interference.
Beyond respecting the formal rights of others, horizontal relationships tend to be markedly free of formal coercion.

Related Results

Dworkin and Luck Egalitarianism
Dworkin and Luck Egalitarianism
Ronald Dworkin is a founding father of what has come to be called “luck egalitarianism,” a family of distributive justice doctrines that hold that the inequalities in people’s cond...
Legacy
Legacy
This chapter examines the legacy of the Scopes trial as well as Clarence Darrow and William Jennings Bryan with respect to creationism. The Scopes trial earned a special place in m...
The Second Generation
The Second Generation
The ideal of democratic socialist egalitarianism was put into practice by the kibbutz. These authors see it as the perfect laboratory for research on egalitarianism. Seeking an ans...
Toward a Pragmatist Egalitarianism
Toward a Pragmatist Egalitarianism
This chapter outlines some of American pragmatism’s central doctrines (its “problem-centric” slant, its experimentalism, its antiessentialism and its impetus for mediation and reco...
Two Concepts of Equality
Two Concepts of Equality
This chapter distinguishes between “vertical” and “horizontal” egalitarianism. The vertical and horizontal metaphors differentiate primarily between two types of relationship in wh...
32. Rawls
32. Rawls
This chapter examines the main arguments for John Rawls's ideas about justice. Rawls identified two principles as central to political liberalism: the principle of equal basic righ...
The Individualist Egalitarianism of William James
The Individualist Egalitarianism of William James
This chapter introduces and defends the democratic individualism in William James’s thought. Drawing on the work of George Kateb and others, it shows that what James calls the “dem...
Redeeming La Raza
Redeeming La Raza
This book examines the gendered and class-conscious political activism of Mexican-origin people in Texas from 1900 to 1950. In particular, it questions the inter-generational agenc...

Back to Top