Javascript must be enabled to continue!
API Load Rating of Marine Riser Couplings: Application of RP 2R Guidelines and Supplemental Methods
View through CrossRef
ABSTRACT
This paper provides an example of the use of the American Petroleum Institute's Recommended Practice 2R in determining the load rating of a riser coupling, and includes additional supplemental guidelines and information. The supplemental information is based on results from analyses and full-scale testing of a dog-type marine riser coupling. An example of determining the capacity of a non-axisymmetric section is provided, followed by recommendations for shear and bearing design limits. The API RP 2R fatigue life factor (FLF) is discussed with comments on its use. The paper concludes with additional recommendations for the axisymmetric tension and pressure tests.
INTRODUCTION
Before publication of the American Petroleum Institute Recommended Practice for Design, Rating, and Testing of Marine Drilling Riser Couplings1 (API RP 2R), there was no generally accepted-method for specifying the load rating of a riser coupling. Each manufacturer, contractor, and operator used different terminology and design critp.ria. Therefore, each riser system and coupling was analyzed and evaluated independently. As a result, it was difficult to compare and group riser coupling load carrying capacities for different connectors. API RP 2R was developed as a standard method for establishing load ratings. It has been published for two years, has been generally well accepted by the industry, and is now scheduled to change from a recommended practice to a design specification. This paper illustrates how API RP 2R guidelines wp.re used in the design, rating, and testing of a dog-type marine riser coupling. API RP 2R provided good general guidance, although not all details of connector design, analysis, and testing were addressed. Supplemental information and guidelines are presented here that prove useful in developing marine riser connectors.
SUMMARY OF API RP 2R
API RP 2R has established guidelines for riser coupling design in five general areas:Design Parameters.API RP 2R defines the important parameters that need to be considered in designing marine riser couplings, including external load conditions and the effects of internal preload. Additionally, standard nomenclature and connector types are defined.Analytical Guidelines. Finite element analysis is recommended as the appropriate analytical technique to determine stress distribution in a riser coupling. Recommendations for modeling and evaluating results are provided. The von Mises criterion, also known as the octahedral shear stress theory, is suggested as the correct failure theory to use in comparing calculated stress with API-defined allowable stress.Fatigue Life Factor. Fatigue resistance is addressed in API RP 2R by the Fatigue Life Factor (FLF). A standard method for determining FLF is specified. This method results in a comparative numerical value that indicates the resistance of a coupling to fatigue failure. However, as stated in API RP 2R, the FLF only provides a basis for comparison and does not provide an absolute measure of the fatigue resistance of a coupling. Currently, API RP 2R does not recommend a minimum FLF.Riser Coupling Rating. The load rating procedure establishes a design loan which represents the safe load-carrying capability of the riser coupling. This design load is an axisymmetric tension representative of combined bending and tension.
Title: API Load Rating of Marine Riser Couplings: Application of RP 2R Guidelines and Supplemental Methods
Description:
ABSTRACT
This paper provides an example of the use of the American Petroleum Institute's Recommended Practice 2R in determining the load rating of a riser coupling, and includes additional supplemental guidelines and information.
The supplemental information is based on results from analyses and full-scale testing of a dog-type marine riser coupling.
An example of determining the capacity of a non-axisymmetric section is provided, followed by recommendations for shear and bearing design limits.
The API RP 2R fatigue life factor (FLF) is discussed with comments on its use.
The paper concludes with additional recommendations for the axisymmetric tension and pressure tests.
INTRODUCTION
Before publication of the American Petroleum Institute Recommended Practice for Design, Rating, and Testing of Marine Drilling Riser Couplings1 (API RP 2R), there was no generally accepted-method for specifying the load rating of a riser coupling.
Each manufacturer, contractor, and operator used different terminology and design critp.
ria.
Therefore, each riser system and coupling was analyzed and evaluated independently.
As a result, it was difficult to compare and group riser coupling load carrying capacities for different connectors.
API RP 2R was developed as a standard method for establishing load ratings.
It has been published for two years, has been generally well accepted by the industry, and is now scheduled to change from a recommended practice to a design specification.
This paper illustrates how API RP 2R guidelines wp.
re used in the design, rating, and testing of a dog-type marine riser coupling.
API RP 2R provided good general guidance, although not all details of connector design, analysis, and testing were addressed.
Supplemental information and guidelines are presented here that prove useful in developing marine riser connectors.
SUMMARY OF API RP 2R
API RP 2R has established guidelines for riser coupling design in five general areas:Design Parameters.
API RP 2R defines the important parameters that need to be considered in designing marine riser couplings, including external load conditions and the effects of internal preload.
Additionally, standard nomenclature and connector types are defined.
Analytical Guidelines.
Finite element analysis is recommended as the appropriate analytical technique to determine stress distribution in a riser coupling.
Recommendations for modeling and evaluating results are provided.
The von Mises criterion, also known as the octahedral shear stress theory, is suggested as the correct failure theory to use in comparing calculated stress with API-defined allowable stress.
Fatigue Life Factor.
Fatigue resistance is addressed in API RP 2R by the Fatigue Life Factor (FLF).
A standard method for determining FLF is specified.
This method results in a comparative numerical value that indicates the resistance of a coupling to fatigue failure.
However, as stated in API RP 2R, the FLF only provides a basis for comparison and does not provide an absolute measure of the fatigue resistance of a coupling.
Currently, API RP 2R does not recommend a minimum FLF.
Riser Coupling Rating.
The load rating procedure establishes a design loan which represents the safe load-carrying capability of the riser coupling.
This design load is an axisymmetric tension representative of combined bending and tension.
Related Results
Riser Integrity Management-Recent Advances in the Deepwater Industry Practice
Riser Integrity Management-Recent Advances in the Deepwater Industry Practice
Abstract
Riser Integrity Management (RIM) could be defined as a continuous process of ‘knowledge and experience management’ applied throughout the lifecycle of th...
Use and Conversion of an Existing Marine Drilling Riser for a System Integration Test for the Collection of Seafloor Polymetallic Nodules
Use and Conversion of an Existing Marine Drilling Riser for a System Integration Test for the Collection of Seafloor Polymetallic Nodules
Abstract
The world's demand for metal is rising and new solutions must be explored to meet the needs associated with population growth, urbanization, decarbonized en...
Riser Tensioner Force Variations
Riser Tensioner Force Variations
ABSTRACT
Excessive riser force variation on the upper joint in a riser string can lead to buckling and excessive fatigue. This variation is due to two components ...
Hybrid Riser Base Jumper Design Methods, Challenges and Solutions
Hybrid Riser Base Jumper Design Methods, Challenges and Solutions
Abstract
The increased number of hybrid riser systems, either installed or planned, in deepwater regions across the world has driven a corresponding growth in the...
Comparative Study for a Dropped Riser Simulation Using Two Commercial Finite Element Analysis Software
Comparative Study for a Dropped Riser Simulation Using Two Commercial Finite Element Analysis Software
Abstract
Although the possibility of a riser dropping off from its top hang-off point during installation or in service is minimal, such incident can pose significan...
NDP Review of State-of-the-Art in Riser Monitoring: Lessons Learned and Experiences Gained
NDP Review of State-of-the-Art in Riser Monitoring: Lessons Learned and Experiences Gained
Abstract
As part of the Norwegian Deepwater Programme (NDP) a state of the art review was carried out by DNV to gather information on the various riser monitoring...
Multiple Riser System for Shallow Water
Multiple Riser System for Shallow Water
Abstract
Shallow water and high wave induced ship motions create a challenging and harsh environment for flexible risers and umbilicals. Two new riser systems are...
COBRA Riser Concept for Ultra Deepwater Condition
COBRA Riser Concept for Ultra Deepwater Condition
Offshore ultra deepwater field is being promising as the future of oil and gas reserves. However, the development of ultra deepwater field posed many challenges, in particular, on ...

