Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Ciceronian Skeptical Fideism in the Octavius of Minucius Felix

View through CrossRef
Abstract The dialogue Octavius by Minucius Felix is a point of reception in the legacy of Ciceronian skeptical fideism, and as such it deserves its place in the history of skeptical fideism. Drawing on his Ciceronian model, Minucius depicts a skeptical fideist—Caecilius—struggling to hold on to his religious traditions in the face of the challenges posed by the new religion of Christianity. But Minucius himself is a convert to the new religion and writes in its defense. And this authorial intent distorts the skeptical fideism which Minucius found in Cicero’s De natura deorum by adding credulous and/or dogmatic elements that are ill-fitted to skeptical fideism but well-suited to his authorial intention of answering all available objections to Christianity in the hopes of winning converts.
Title: Ciceronian Skeptical Fideism in the Octavius of Minucius Felix
Description:
Abstract The dialogue Octavius by Minucius Felix is a point of reception in the legacy of Ciceronian skeptical fideism, and as such it deserves its place in the history of skeptical fideism.
Drawing on his Ciceronian model, Minucius depicts a skeptical fideist—Caecilius—struggling to hold on to his religious traditions in the face of the challenges posed by the new religion of Christianity.
But Minucius himself is a convert to the new religion and writes in its defense.
And this authorial intent distorts the skeptical fideism which Minucius found in Cicero’s De natura deorum by adding credulous and/or dogmatic elements that are ill-fitted to skeptical fideism but well-suited to his authorial intention of answering all available objections to Christianity in the hopes of winning converts.

Related Results

Is Kai Nielsen becoming a Wittgensteinian fideist?
Is Kai Nielsen becoming a Wittgensteinian fideist?
In his recourse to a later Wittgensteinian or postmodern social focus, Kai Nielsen relinquishes the analytic argument he once took to be supportive of his naturalistic outlook. Thi...
Note to the Octavius 5.12 of Minucius Felix: An Unexpected Senecan Allusion
Note to the Octavius 5.12 of Minucius Felix: An Unexpected Senecan Allusion
In this note an allusion recreated from Seneca’s De providentia is rescued as it was hidden in the Octavius of Minucius Felix, which recovers and adapted some topics from the Senec...
Negotiating with Nike: Allyson Felix Encounters the "Kiss of Death" (A)
Negotiating with Nike: Allyson Felix Encounters the "Kiss of Death" (A)
This case examines Olympic champion Allyson Felix's high-stakes negotiation with Nike, Inc. (Nike), over maternity protections for sponsored athletes, highlighting broader...
Skeptical, Weakly Skeptical, and Credulous Inference Based on Preferred Ranking Functions
Skeptical, Weakly Skeptical, and Credulous Inference Based on Preferred Ranking Functions
While the axiomatic system P is an important standard for plausible nonmonotonic reasoning, inference relations obtained from system Z or from c-representations have been designed ...
Political beliefs, “catch-all” populism, and political fideism: The leader-centric propaganda model
Political beliefs, “catch-all” populism, and political fideism: The leader-centric propaganda model
In this paper, we will attempt to consider the issue of constructing and justifying political beliefs under the conditions of populist politics and authoritarian regimes. We ...
Strategies of Understanding Skepticism in Contemporary Analytic Epistemology
Strategies of Understanding Skepticism in Contemporary Analytic Epistemology
The paper presents a review of the most significant reference points in the discourse around skepticism within contemporary analytic epistemology. The text examines the primary str...
Philosophical disagreement versus philosophical knowledge
Philosophical disagreement versus philosophical knowledge
We will argue that philosophical disagreement gives us good reasons to be skeptical about philosophical knowledge. First, we will present the case of PHILOSOPHERS to produce a skep...

Back to Top