Javascript must be enabled to continue!
English Poetry
View through CrossRef
The English Renaissance, the age of William Shakespeare, Christopher Marlowe, Sir Philip Sidney, Ben Jonson, John Donne, and John Milton, was one of the most brilliant periods in Western literary history for the production of great poetry. Yet the scope of its achievement is so varied that any effort to account for its multiplicity is inordinately challenging. Between 1509, with the reign of Henry VIII, until the end of the Commonwealth in 1660, nondramatic poetry of the most varied kind—from epic to ballad—found a voice and an audience in recitation, manuscript circulation, and print. The period’s ideals were inscribed in the heroic narratives of Edmund Spenser’s The Faerie Queene and John Milton’s Paradise Lost, in a culture that embraced the epic as a means of political and theological reflection. But just as Renaissance poets looked outward at the turbulent world of early modern history, which they measured in terms of a mythic glorious past, they simultaneously gazed inward to focus on basic issues of identity and subjectivity, being especially attentive to the intricate trajectories of human desire. Beginning with the lyric poetry of John Skelton and Sir Thomas Wyatt, the blending of native, classical, and Continental influences added richness to verse that easily moved from the high to low, from earnest self-scrutiny and entreaty to mockery, play, disdain, and detachment. These qualities would mature in Shakespeare’s Sonnets. English Renaissance poetry is customarily divided chronologically in two ways. Scholars distinguish between either the 16th and 17th centuries or between Tudor (1485–1603) and Stuart (1603–1649) periods. The division between Tudor and Stuart poetry is useful, for instance, in tracing how different poetic concerns, such as satire and religious poetry, challenged sonnet and epic. It helps account for how a growing insistence on “strong lines” of condensed poetic thought found expression in both the measured Augustan style of Ben Jonson and the mannered wit of John Donne. But these divisions can also obscure significant similarities as well between writers such as Spenser and Jonson or Sidney and Milton, who share surprisingly similar attitudes on a variety of literary, political, and social issues. For quality, rhetorical genius, emotional complexity, depth, and variety, the poetry of the English Renaissance is unsurpassed.
Title: English Poetry
Description:
The English Renaissance, the age of William Shakespeare, Christopher Marlowe, Sir Philip Sidney, Ben Jonson, John Donne, and John Milton, was one of the most brilliant periods in Western literary history for the production of great poetry.
Yet the scope of its achievement is so varied that any effort to account for its multiplicity is inordinately challenging.
Between 1509, with the reign of Henry VIII, until the end of the Commonwealth in 1660, nondramatic poetry of the most varied kind—from epic to ballad—found a voice and an audience in recitation, manuscript circulation, and print.
The period’s ideals were inscribed in the heroic narratives of Edmund Spenser’s The Faerie Queene and John Milton’s Paradise Lost, in a culture that embraced the epic as a means of political and theological reflection.
But just as Renaissance poets looked outward at the turbulent world of early modern history, which they measured in terms of a mythic glorious past, they simultaneously gazed inward to focus on basic issues of identity and subjectivity, being especially attentive to the intricate trajectories of human desire.
Beginning with the lyric poetry of John Skelton and Sir Thomas Wyatt, the blending of native, classical, and Continental influences added richness to verse that easily moved from the high to low, from earnest self-scrutiny and entreaty to mockery, play, disdain, and detachment.
These qualities would mature in Shakespeare’s Sonnets.
English Renaissance poetry is customarily divided chronologically in two ways.
Scholars distinguish between either the 16th and 17th centuries or between Tudor (1485–1603) and Stuart (1603–1649) periods.
The division between Tudor and Stuart poetry is useful, for instance, in tracing how different poetic concerns, such as satire and religious poetry, challenged sonnet and epic.
It helps account for how a growing insistence on “strong lines” of condensed poetic thought found expression in both the measured Augustan style of Ben Jonson and the mannered wit of John Donne.
But these divisions can also obscure significant similarities as well between writers such as Spenser and Jonson or Sidney and Milton, who share surprisingly similar attitudes on a variety of literary, political, and social issues.
For quality, rhetorical genius, emotional complexity, depth, and variety, the poetry of the English Renaissance is unsurpassed.
Related Results
Tekstualni subjekt u poeziji Marije Stepanove od 2001. do 2017. godine
Tekstualni subjekt u poeziji Marije Stepanove od 2001. do 2017. godine
Maria Stepanova (b. 1972) is a contemporary Russian poet who has emerged in recent decades as one of the most original and complex voices on the poetically highly heterogeneous and...
Aviation English - A global perspective: analysis, teaching, assessment
Aviation English - A global perspective: analysis, teaching, assessment
This e-book brings together 13 chapters written by aviation English researchers and practitioners settled in six different countries, representing institutions and universities fro...
Indo-Anglian: Connotations and Denotations
Indo-Anglian: Connotations and Denotations
A different name than English literature, ‘Anglo-Indian Literature’, was given to the body of literature in English that emerged on account of the British interaction with India un...
The Semiotics of New Era Poetry: Estonian Instagram and Rap Poetry
The Semiotics of New Era Poetry: Estonian Instagram and Rap Poetry
Mikhail Gasparov concludes his monograph “A History of European Versification” with the recognition that in the development of particular verse forms in each tradition of poetry, t...
<b>A Critical Study on Contemporary Poetry in Indian English Writing</b>
<b>A Critical Study on Contemporary Poetry in Indian English Writing</b>
This study conducts a comprehensive analysis of Indian English poetry. The author has incorporated samples from notable works and analysed the issues they present to illustrate the...
吳喬《圍爐詩話》的比興説
吳喬《圍爐詩話》的比興説
LANGUAGE NOTE | Document text in Chinese; abstract also in English.
吳喬(1611—1695)是明清之際的詩人和詩學理論家,所著詩學論著,現存的有《逃禪詩話》一卷、《圍爐詩話》六卷、《答萬季野詩問》一卷、《答萬季野詩問補遺》一卷和《西崑發微》三卷等。他認為詩是經史之學,主張詩中有人,詩要有意...
“Misty Poetry” as a reflection of the nature of Chinese literature of the “New Period” (second half of the 20th century)
“Misty Poetry” as a reflection of the nature of Chinese literature of the “New Period” (second half of the 20th century)
The subject of the study is the formation of “Misty Poetry” trend in Chinese literature of the late 20th century. The study aims at the disclosure of the dynamics of “Misty Poetry”...
XVI. YÜZYILDA ŞİİRİ KINAMA VE SAVUNMA: KINALIZÂDE HASAN ÇELEBİ’NİN İTÂB-GÛNE TEZKİRESİ ÜZERİNE
XVI. YÜZYILDA ŞİİRİ KINAMA VE SAVUNMA: KINALIZÂDE HASAN ÇELEBİ’NİN İTÂB-GÛNE TEZKİRESİ ÜZERİNE
Writing poetry has been an issue of debate throughout history. Moreover, writing poetry was also opposed from time to time. This situation also preserved its validity at the time o...

