Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Sterne and Shklovsky, Revisited

View through CrossRef
Abstract This chapter revisits Viktor Shklovsky’s lifelong fascination with Laurence Sterne. It begins by examining the mixed reception of Shklovsky’s pamphlet Sterne’s ‘Tristram Shandy’ and the Theory of the Novel (1921), comparing how academic and creative circles responded to Shklovsky’s portrayal of Sterne. It then considers the Sternean dimensions of Shklovsky’s performative criticism and his literary self-fashioning. Through a comparison of Sterne’s A Sentimental Journey and Shklovsky’s Zoo, or Letters Not About Love, read alongside Shklovsky’s correspondence with Elsa Triolet, it examines the affinity between Shklovsky and Sterne in their blurring of the line between private and public selves and in their use of their books to construct biographical myths around the women they address (Elsa Triolet and Eliza Draper). It concludes by discussing early Soviet views on sternianstvo and tracing of how Shklovsky’s engagement with Sterne continued beyond the 1920s.
Title: Sterne and Shklovsky, Revisited
Description:
Abstract This chapter revisits Viktor Shklovsky’s lifelong fascination with Laurence Sterne.
It begins by examining the mixed reception of Shklovsky’s pamphlet Sterne’s ‘Tristram Shandy’ and the Theory of the Novel (1921), comparing how academic and creative circles responded to Shklovsky’s portrayal of Sterne.
It then considers the Sternean dimensions of Shklovsky’s performative criticism and his literary self-fashioning.
Through a comparison of Sterne’s A Sentimental Journey and Shklovsky’s Zoo, or Letters Not About Love, read alongside Shklovsky’s correspondence with Elsa Triolet, it examines the affinity between Shklovsky and Sterne in their blurring of the line between private and public selves and in their use of their books to construct biographical myths around the women they address (Elsa Triolet and Eliza Draper).
It concludes by discussing early Soviet views on sternianstvo and tracing of how Shklovsky’s engagement with Sterne continued beyond the 1920s.

Related Results

Introduction
Introduction
Abstract The introduction to The Secret Order of Shandeans provides the historical, cultural, and intellectual context for Laurence Sterne’s reception in Soviet R...
Orna Me: Laurence Sterne’s Open Letter to Literary History
Orna Me: Laurence Sterne’s Open Letter to Literary History
This essay considers the curious way Laurence Sterne communicates with and reflects on his literary predecessors, most often Alexander Pope, by writing love letters to women. Focus...
Swift, Sterne, and the Skeptical Tradition
Swift, Sterne, and the Skeptical Tradition
Abstract In a recent essay Donald Wehrs suggests that the tradition of fideistic skepticism offers a meaningful context for Laurence Sterne’s narrative and thematic ...
The Learned Readers
The Learned Readers
Abstract This chapter discusses two philosophers and translators, Gustav Shpet and Adrian Frankovskii, who worked on Sterne in the 1930s. Both Shpet and Frankovsk...
Shklovsky, Viktor (1893–1984)
Shklovsky, Viktor (1893–1984)
Born in St Petersburg, Russia, Victor Borisovich Shklovsky (or Shklovskii; Ви́ктор Бори́сович Шкло́вский) was a literary critic, autobiographical novelist, and a leading figure of ...
Viktor Shklovsky's Heritage in Literature, Arts, and Philosophy
Viktor Shklovsky's Heritage in Literature, Arts, and Philosophy
This book examines the heritage of Victor Shklovsky in a variety of disciplines. To achieve this end, Slav N. Gratchev and Howard Mancing draw upon colleagues from eight different ...
Laurence Sterne's Sermons and The Pulpit-Fool
Laurence Sterne's Sermons and The Pulpit-Fool
Because Laurence Sterne suggested that sermons should come from the heart and should be practical rather than polemical, his own sermons have often been read as products of a senti...
The Odd Couple
The Odd Couple
Laurence Sterne’s borrowings from John Norris of Bemerton, overlooked by previous scholars, establish this Anglican Neoplatonist (1657–1711) as one of Sterne’s most important sourc...

Back to Top