Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

not-yet-known not-yet-known not-yet-known unknown ”Decoding the H-V Interval: Unraveling Its Reliability as a Pacemaker Indicator Post-TAVI”

View through CrossRef
not-yet-known not-yet-known not-yet-known unknown Introduction: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a treatment for severe aortic stenosis in high-risk and intermediate-risk patients unsuitable for surgery. Despite its minimally invasive nature, TAVI often leads to complications, including de novo left bundle branch block (LBBB), which increases the risk of complete atrioventricular (AV) block, heart failure, and sudden cardiac death. Current guidelines provide ambiguous recommendations for permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation for patients with LBBB post-TAVI. This report aims to reevaluate the HV interval cutoff and explore alternative predictors for PPM decisions in patients with LBBB after TAVI. Case Description: A 79-year-old female with non-obstructive coronary artery disease and severe symptomatic aortic stenosis underwent TAVI with a 26 mm Edwards Resilia balloon-expandable valve. Pre-TAVI electrocardiography (ECG) showed sinus rhythm with a QRS duration of 98 ms. Post-TAVI, the patient developed a first-degree AV delay and new-onset LBBB. An electrophysiological study (EPS) performed 48 hours post-TAVI showed an HV interval of 61 ms. Despite this, the patient developed symptomatic complete heart block hours later, necessitating urgent PPM implantation. Discussion: This case questions the reliability of the HV interval as a standalone marker for pacemaker decisions in LBBB post-TAVI patients. The occurrence of complete heart block despite an HV interval below predictive values raises concerns about this parameter’s accuracy. Alternative predictors such as the delta HV interval and AH interval may provide better insights. Delayed EPS assessment might be more appropriate. Conclusion: Managing LBBB after TAVI is complex. Reevaluation of HV interval reliability and larger trials to establish accurate predictors and refine PPM implantation criteria post-TAVI are needed to improve patient outcomes.
Title: not-yet-known not-yet-known not-yet-known unknown ”Decoding the H-V Interval: Unraveling Its Reliability as a Pacemaker Indicator Post-TAVI”
Description:
not-yet-known not-yet-known not-yet-known unknown Introduction: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a treatment for severe aortic stenosis in high-risk and intermediate-risk patients unsuitable for surgery.
Despite its minimally invasive nature, TAVI often leads to complications, including de novo left bundle branch block (LBBB), which increases the risk of complete atrioventricular (AV) block, heart failure, and sudden cardiac death.
Current guidelines provide ambiguous recommendations for permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation for patients with LBBB post-TAVI.
This report aims to reevaluate the HV interval cutoff and explore alternative predictors for PPM decisions in patients with LBBB after TAVI.
Case Description: A 79-year-old female with non-obstructive coronary artery disease and severe symptomatic aortic stenosis underwent TAVI with a 26 mm Edwards Resilia balloon-expandable valve.
Pre-TAVI electrocardiography (ECG) showed sinus rhythm with a QRS duration of 98 ms.
Post-TAVI, the patient developed a first-degree AV delay and new-onset LBBB.
An electrophysiological study (EPS) performed 48 hours post-TAVI showed an HV interval of 61 ms.
Despite this, the patient developed symptomatic complete heart block hours later, necessitating urgent PPM implantation.
Discussion: This case questions the reliability of the HV interval as a standalone marker for pacemaker decisions in LBBB post-TAVI patients.
The occurrence of complete heart block despite an HV interval below predictive values raises concerns about this parameter’s accuracy.
Alternative predictors such as the delta HV interval and AH interval may provide better insights.
Delayed EPS assessment might be more appropriate.
Conclusion: Managing LBBB after TAVI is complex.
Reevaluation of HV interval reliability and larger trials to establish accurate predictors and refine PPM implantation criteria post-TAVI are needed to improve patient outcomes.

Related Results

Prognostic impact of postprocedure stroke volume in patients with low-gradient aortic stenosis
Prognostic impact of postprocedure stroke volume in patients with low-gradient aortic stenosis
Objective The effect of postoperative blood flow status on the prognosis of patients with low-gradient severe aortic stenosis (AS) has not been examined. Severe A...
Predisposing and precipitating factors of post-operative delirium after transfemoral TAVI
Predisposing and precipitating factors of post-operative delirium after transfemoral TAVI
Abstract Background Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) represents the treatment of choice for aortic stenosis (AS) p...
Post-TAVI pacemaker requirement prediction - simple math?
Post-TAVI pacemaker requirement prediction - simple math?
Abstract Introduction As transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) procedures become increasingly common, predicting...
Predictors of futility outcomes after TAVI: insights from the France TAVI Registry
Predictors of futility outcomes after TAVI: insights from the France TAVI Registry
Abstract Background Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has revolutionized the treatment of aortic stenosis and provi...

Back to Top