Javascript must be enabled to continue!
“Sanctions law”: problem statement
View through CrossRef
The unilateral coercive measures of states also wrongly called sanctions have occupied a significant place in law; the current state of the latter is analyzed. The complex set of legal rules have appeared concerning sanctions exactly, countersanctions targeted against them and their legal consequences as well as restrictions, prohibitions and exemptions caused by the sanctions policy. Lawyers have to deal with numerous conflicts related to the implementation of prohibitions imposed on already highly complex structure of the foreign economic activity’s regulation.It impacted the perception of law from the point of view of systematic approach as soon as it needs to be determined what area of law the unilateral state restrictions belong to and what is the relationship between the national and the international legal regulation hereof from a formal legal point of view. The sanctions are considered by the author within the context of the correlation between legal systems and the logic of interaction between them. Nowadays the sanctions law is the combination of disparate legal provisions and practices allowing to use the sanctions as the instrument in the global competitive clash. Historical and comparative legal analysis methods enable to confirm that the terminological substitution happened at a certain historical point: the term “sanctions” began to be used in relation not only to measures taken by the Security Council under the UN Charter, but also to unilateral state acts. Dialectical and logical approaches allowed to trace the meaning and the purpose of the international legal regulation in the sphere of international trade and economic relations. It has always been aimed to remove any barriers and obstacles to the free movement of goods, services, capitals and labor. Therefore, an arbitrary and uncontrolled sanctions pressure contravenes the meaning and the purpose of the existing international law. The regulation of the unilateral state restrictions shall be interrelated at the level of legal systems and be based on the rules of the international law providing for the free trade and commercial exchange without trade barriers. The importance of the distinction between sanctions provided for by the international law and countermeasures as the means of states response to the violation of law committed by another state is emphasized. The author concludes that it is necessary to adopt the special international legal regulation regarding the conditions of imposing countermeasures, suggests to use the provisions of the Draft Articles on State Responsibility and substantiates the need for the establishment of the international competition law.
Title: “Sanctions law”: problem statement
Description:
The unilateral coercive measures of states also wrongly called sanctions have occupied a significant place in law; the current state of the latter is analyzed.
The complex set of legal rules have appeared concerning sanctions exactly, countersanctions targeted against them and their legal consequences as well as restrictions, prohibitions and exemptions caused by the sanctions policy.
Lawyers have to deal with numerous conflicts related to the implementation of prohibitions imposed on already highly complex structure of the foreign economic activity’s regulation.
It impacted the perception of law from the point of view of systematic approach as soon as it needs to be determined what area of law the unilateral state restrictions belong to and what is the relationship between the national and the international legal regulation hereof from a formal legal point of view.
The sanctions are considered by the author within the context of the correlation between legal systems and the logic of interaction between them.
Nowadays the sanctions law is the combination of disparate legal provisions and practices allowing to use the sanctions as the instrument in the global competitive clash.
Historical and comparative legal analysis methods enable to confirm that the terminological substitution happened at a certain historical point: the term “sanctions” began to be used in relation not only to measures taken by the Security Council under the UN Charter, but also to unilateral state acts.
Dialectical and logical approaches allowed to trace the meaning and the purpose of the international legal regulation in the sphere of international trade and economic relations.
It has always been aimed to remove any barriers and obstacles to the free movement of goods, services, capitals and labor.
Therefore, an arbitrary and uncontrolled sanctions pressure contravenes the meaning and the purpose of the existing international law.
The regulation of the unilateral state restrictions shall be interrelated at the level of legal systems and be based on the rules of the international law providing for the free trade and commercial exchange without trade barriers.
The importance of the distinction between sanctions provided for by the international law and countermeasures as the means of states response to the violation of law committed by another state is emphasized.
The author concludes that it is necessary to adopt the special international legal regulation regarding the conditions of imposing countermeasures, suggests to use the provisions of the Draft Articles on State Responsibility and substantiates the need for the establishment of the international competition law.
Related Results
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere is a monograph that argues for a fundamental reorientation of constitutional law around the realities of biospheric interdep...
Mezinárodní právo na prahu 21. století (dosažený stav, neúspěchy a perspektivy)
Mezinárodní právo na prahu 21. století (dosažený stav, neúspěchy a perspektivy)
The study deal with selected problems of international law at the time of change of the 20th and 21st centuries. Such a milestone gives an opportunity to review the achieved state ...
Researching Modern Economic Sanctions
Researching Modern Economic Sanctions
Economic sanctions are an integral part of states’ foreign policy repertoire. Increasingly, major powers and international organizations rely on sanctions to address an incredibly ...
International Sanctions
International Sanctions
No authoritative definition of a “sanction” exists in international law, yet the term is frequently used to describe unfriendly measures short of war, particularly those of economi...
Energy Sanctions Hegemony
Energy Sanctions Hegemony
<p><span>While the United States leverages its global financial dominance to deploy unilateral energy sanctions as a primary economic tool, <span>these sanctions ...
Paul’s view of the law in Romans and the Ethiopic tradition
Paul’s view of the law in Romans and the Ethiopic tradition
ABSTRACT
This dissertation examines Paul’s view of the law in Romans, interacting with modern exegetical traditions addressing the Old, New, and Radical New Perspectives, aiming to...
Economic sanctions and human security : overstated backfire
Economic sanctions and human security : overstated backfire
[ACCESS RESTRICTED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI AT AUTHOR'S REQUEST.] A large body of scholarship have shown that economic sanctions cause human suffering in target states. This u...
International Construction Law
International Construction Law
International law is a body of legally binding norms that regulate relations between the subjects of the international legal system and structure the functioning of the internation...

