Javascript must be enabled to continue!
International Sanctions
View through CrossRef
No authoritative definition of a “sanction” exists in international law, yet the term is frequently used to describe unfriendly measures short of war, particularly those of economic nature. One commonly used definition is the “deliberate, government-inspired withdrawal or threat of withdrawal of customary trade or financial relations” (Hufbauer, et al. 2007, p. 3; cited under Effectiveness of Sanctions). Discussions of sanctions typically focus on economic sanctions, which involve prohibiting economic transactions with sanctioned persons. Reasons for the imposition of sanctions vary, and governments frequently target officials of unfriendly regimes or individuals suspected of involvement in crime or terrorism. Sanctions can also include export/import or investment restrictions and can be directed against a sector of the economy that is deemed to facilitate harmful behavior (e.g., arms industry or research related to weapons of mass destruction) or be a lucrative funding source (e.g., trade in high-value goods such as diamonds, oil or timber). Travel sanctions, which preclude sanctioned individuals from entering the sanctioning state, are also common. In contrast, the original form of international sanctions, i.e., embargo on the totality of trade with another country, is now rarely used due to its far-reaching humanitarian consequences. Purely diplomatic or political measures, such as breaking off diplomatic relations, are not normally viewed as “sanctions” in the sense discussed here; the same applies to military action. The characterization of international sanctions as being “between words and wars” is thus a helpful cliché (Wallensteen and Staibano 2005, cited under General Overviews). Conversations about international sanctions generally concern two sets of issues: their objectives and effectiveness on one side, and their legality and human rights impact on the other side. These are related in that sanctions are at their most potent when applied by powerful states or international organizations, and it is also then that the issues of accountability loom large. Some sanctions, particularly those against suspected terrorists, are adopted by the UN Security Council and are thus binding on all UN members. Others are enacted by individual states or the European Union (EU), a uniquely integrated regional organization with a common foreign policy. Sanctions taken outside the UN framework are known as “unilateral,” and the United States and EU are major economic powers that make active use of unilateral sanctions.
Title: International Sanctions
Description:
No authoritative definition of a “sanction” exists in international law, yet the term is frequently used to describe unfriendly measures short of war, particularly those of economic nature.
One commonly used definition is the “deliberate, government-inspired withdrawal or threat of withdrawal of customary trade or financial relations” (Hufbauer, et al.
2007, p.
3; cited under Effectiveness of Sanctions).
Discussions of sanctions typically focus on economic sanctions, which involve prohibiting economic transactions with sanctioned persons.
Reasons for the imposition of sanctions vary, and governments frequently target officials of unfriendly regimes or individuals suspected of involvement in crime or terrorism.
Sanctions can also include export/import or investment restrictions and can be directed against a sector of the economy that is deemed to facilitate harmful behavior (e.
g.
, arms industry or research related to weapons of mass destruction) or be a lucrative funding source (e.
g.
, trade in high-value goods such as diamonds, oil or timber).
Travel sanctions, which preclude sanctioned individuals from entering the sanctioning state, are also common.
In contrast, the original form of international sanctions, i.
e.
, embargo on the totality of trade with another country, is now rarely used due to its far-reaching humanitarian consequences.
Purely diplomatic or political measures, such as breaking off diplomatic relations, are not normally viewed as “sanctions” in the sense discussed here; the same applies to military action.
The characterization of international sanctions as being “between words and wars” is thus a helpful cliché (Wallensteen and Staibano 2005, cited under General Overviews).
Conversations about international sanctions generally concern two sets of issues: their objectives and effectiveness on one side, and their legality and human rights impact on the other side.
These are related in that sanctions are at their most potent when applied by powerful states or international organizations, and it is also then that the issues of accountability loom large.
Some sanctions, particularly those against suspected terrorists, are adopted by the UN Security Council and are thus binding on all UN members.
Others are enacted by individual states or the European Union (EU), a uniquely integrated regional organization with a common foreign policy.
Sanctions taken outside the UN framework are known as “unilateral,” and the United States and EU are major economic powers that make active use of unilateral sanctions.
Related Results
Researching Modern Economic Sanctions
Researching Modern Economic Sanctions
Economic sanctions are an integral part of states’ foreign policy repertoire. Increasingly, major powers and international organizations rely on sanctions to address an incredibly ...
Unilateral Sanctions in the Context of Modern International Law
Unilateral Sanctions in the Context of Modern International Law
The author discusses the modern international legal framework governing the application of sanctions. The author focuses on the following issues: international and regional sanctio...
Economic Coercion and Sanctions
Economic Coercion and Sanctions
Since at least the Athenian trade ban on Megara, in the run-up to the Peloponnesian War, states have used economic sanctions to pursue their foreign policy goals. Using a definitio...
Energy Sanctions Hegemony
Energy Sanctions Hegemony
<p><span>While the United States leverages its global financial dominance to deploy unilateral energy sanctions as a primary economic tool, <span>these sanctions ...
Strike one hundred to educate one: Measuring the efficacy of collective sanctions experimentally
Strike one hundred to educate one: Measuring the efficacy of collective sanctions experimentally
In this paper, we test whether sanctions applied to an entire group on account of the free-riding of one of its members can promote group cooperation. To measure the efficiency of ...
Economic Sanctions and Food Consumption: Evidence from Iranian Households
Economic Sanctions and Food Consumption: Evidence from Iranian Households
Abstracts
Despite scholarly consensus on the harmful effects of economic sanctions on civilians, there is little micro-level empirical research on how and to what ex...
Sanctions and Monetary Obligations
Sanctions and Monetary Obligations
Abstract
This chapter focuses on economic sanctions. In general terms, sanctions will usually involve a ‘freeze’ over the assets of the target State, to the extent t...
The legacy of the UN Security Council sanctions on Iraq
The legacy of the UN Security Council sanctions on Iraq
In thinking about the legacy of the sanctions on Iraq, some things are quite clear: the long-term impact of malnutrition; the loss of life and the suffering from lack of adequate m...

