Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The challenges to inferring the regulators of biodiversity in deep time
View through CrossRef
Attempts to infer the ecological drivers of macroevolution have long drawn inspiration from work on extant systems, but long-term evolutionary and geological changes complicate the simple extrapolation of such theory into a deep-time setting. Recent efforts to incorporate a more informed ecology into macroevolution have moved beyond the descriptive to attempts that seek to isolate the generating mechanisms of dynamic signatures to produce testable hypotheses of how species and larger groups usurp or co-exist alongside one another over vast spans of time. The papers of this Theme Issue exemplify this progress, providing a series of case studies of how novel modelling approaches are helping infer the regulators of biodiversity in deep time. In this Introduction, we aim to discuss the challenges associated with this area. We break our Introduction into four main areas. First, we discuss how our choices of biological units for study have implications for the conclusions subsequently drawn. Second, we emphasize the need to embrace the interdependence of biotic and abiotic change, because no living organism ignores its environment. Third, in the light of parts 1 and 2, we discuss the set of dynamic signatures that we might expect to observe in the fossil record. Finally, we ask whether these signatures are the most ecologically informative foci for research efforts aimed at inferring the regulators of biodiversity in deep time. The papers in this Theme Issue contribute in each of these areas.
Title: The challenges to inferring the regulators of biodiversity in deep time
Description:
Attempts to infer the ecological drivers of macroevolution have long drawn inspiration from work on extant systems, but long-term evolutionary and geological changes complicate the simple extrapolation of such theory into a deep-time setting.
Recent efforts to incorporate a more informed ecology into macroevolution have moved beyond the descriptive to attempts that seek to isolate the generating mechanisms of dynamic signatures to produce testable hypotheses of how species and larger groups usurp or co-exist alongside one another over vast spans of time.
The papers of this Theme Issue exemplify this progress, providing a series of case studies of how novel modelling approaches are helping infer the regulators of biodiversity in deep time.
In this Introduction, we aim to discuss the challenges associated with this area.
We break our Introduction into four main areas.
First, we discuss how our choices of biological units for study have implications for the conclusions subsequently drawn.
Second, we emphasize the need to embrace the interdependence of biotic and abiotic change, because no living organism ignores its environment.
Third, in the light of parts 1 and 2, we discuss the set of dynamic signatures that we might expect to observe in the fossil record.
Finally, we ask whether these signatures are the most ecologically informative foci for research efforts aimed at inferring the regulators of biodiversity in deep time.
The papers in this Theme Issue contribute in each of these areas.
Related Results
Global Open Biodiversity Data: Future Vision of FAIR Biodiversity Data Access, Management, Use and Stewardship
Global Open Biodiversity Data: Future Vision of FAIR Biodiversity Data Access, Management, Use and Stewardship
Major environmental–biodiversity changes and new developments in technology have changed the way we live, work and how we create our future. The main attention of biodiversity rese...
The business case for investing in biodiversity data
The business case for investing in biodiversity data
1. The private sector is increasingly aware of its dependence on biodiversity and the financial risks and opportunities involved. This has generated a lot of demand for investing i...
Soil biodiversity
Soil biodiversity
About this collection This Collection is the work of more than 50 scientists and Young Reviewers from all around the globe. Our role as editors, together with the authors, was to s...
Toward a Unified Framework in Biodiversity Studies
Toward a Unified Framework in Biodiversity Studies
Biodiversity has been defined as the “full variety of life on Earth” (Takacs 1996). Because biodiversity refers to a fundamental property of ecological systems, it continues to dev...
Biodiversity Information Standards (TDWG): Social and Conceptual Infrastructure for Integrating Biodiversity Information
Biodiversity Information Standards (TDWG): Social and Conceptual Infrastructure for Integrating Biodiversity Information
The International Working Group on Taxonomic Databases (TDWG)*1 was established in 1985 to promote biodiversity data sharing and collaboration among organizations, projects, and pe...
An Investigation of Secondary School Students’ Biodiversity Literacy Level
An Investigation of Secondary School Students’ Biodiversity Literacy Level
The quality of life sustained by human beings is largely possible thanks to the opportunities offered by the biodiversity resources in nature. It is widely accepted that the contin...
Impact of Biodiversity Risk on Bank Lending
Impact of Biodiversity Risk on Bank Lending
AbstractThis study focuses on the consequences of the threat of biodiversity loss for bank lending in the US economy. Enlarged biodiversity risks are expected to reduce bank lendin...
The biodiversity of ice‐free Antarctica database
The biodiversity of ice‐free Antarctica database
AbstractAntarctica is one of Earth's most untouched, inhospitable, and poorly known regions. Although knowledge of its biodiversity has increased over recent decades, a diverse, wi...

