Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Toward a Unified Framework in Biodiversity Studies
View through CrossRef
Biodiversity has been defined as the “full variety of life on Earth” (Takacs 1996). Because biodiversity refers to a fundamental property of ecological systems, it continues to develop as a scientific frontier for exploration and discovery. Ecological systems are a mixture, or diversity, of living and nonliving entities interconnected by a web of interactions. Biodiversity is a concept used to describe the number, variety, and organization of entities in the biosphere, or a unit of the biosphere, and their relationships to each other (Gaston 1996). More importantly, biodiversity includes consideration of processes that create and maintain variation in ecological systems (Groombridge 1992). Therefore, biodiversity is not simply about entities and taxonomy. Rather, biodiversity is concerned with the diversity of species within communities, the range of ecological processes within ecosystems, and the diversity of ecosystem processes across landscape mosaics (Heywood 1994, Levin 1997). A similar perspective on biodiversity is provided by Noss (1990), who applies the concept over hierarchical levels of organization ranging from the gene to the entire biosphere, and recognizes compositional, structural, and functional approaches to biodiversity. In contrast to this broad and comprehensive scope of biodiversity suggested above, researchers and conservationists often employ a narrow definition of biodiversity shaped by their values, interests, and goals. A more precise and more widely recognized interpretation of the scope of biodiversity is required in order to promote scientific research and to develop management programs (Christensen et al. 1996). The objective of this chapter is to build on the comprehensive framework for biodiversity proposed in the introduction (chapter 1, fig.1.1) and combine it with additional insights from the other chapters. The initial framework recognizes biodiversity to include four components, and one complex output. The components are the roster of entities, the number of each kind of entity, the nature and degree of difference between the entities, and the spatial or functional organization of the entities. The outcome is the effect of biodiversity on ecosystem processes. This framework enables us to (1) map, in a more unified way, the present achievements of research in the field of biodiversity, (2) understand the complexity of biodiversity, and (3) advance the scientific basis for biodiversity management.
Title: Toward a Unified Framework in Biodiversity Studies
Description:
Biodiversity has been defined as the “full variety of life on Earth” (Takacs 1996).
Because biodiversity refers to a fundamental property of ecological systems, it continues to develop as a scientific frontier for exploration and discovery.
Ecological systems are a mixture, or diversity, of living and nonliving entities interconnected by a web of interactions.
Biodiversity is a concept used to describe the number, variety, and organization of entities in the biosphere, or a unit of the biosphere, and their relationships to each other (Gaston 1996).
More importantly, biodiversity includes consideration of processes that create and maintain variation in ecological systems (Groombridge 1992).
Therefore, biodiversity is not simply about entities and taxonomy.
Rather, biodiversity is concerned with the diversity of species within communities, the range of ecological processes within ecosystems, and the diversity of ecosystem processes across landscape mosaics (Heywood 1994, Levin 1997).
A similar perspective on biodiversity is provided by Noss (1990), who applies the concept over hierarchical levels of organization ranging from the gene to the entire biosphere, and recognizes compositional, structural, and functional approaches to biodiversity.
In contrast to this broad and comprehensive scope of biodiversity suggested above, researchers and conservationists often employ a narrow definition of biodiversity shaped by their values, interests, and goals.
A more precise and more widely recognized interpretation of the scope of biodiversity is required in order to promote scientific research and to develop management programs (Christensen et al.
1996).
The objective of this chapter is to build on the comprehensive framework for biodiversity proposed in the introduction (chapter 1, fig.
1.
1) and combine it with additional insights from the other chapters.
The initial framework recognizes biodiversity to include four components, and one complex output.
The components are the roster of entities, the number of each kind of entity, the nature and degree of difference between the entities, and the spatial or functional organization of the entities.
The outcome is the effect of biodiversity on ecosystem processes.
This framework enables us to (1) map, in a more unified way, the present achievements of research in the field of biodiversity, (2) understand the complexity of biodiversity, and (3) advance the scientific basis for biodiversity management.
Related Results
Global Open Biodiversity Data: Future Vision of FAIR Biodiversity Data Access, Management, Use and Stewardship
Global Open Biodiversity Data: Future Vision of FAIR Biodiversity Data Access, Management, Use and Stewardship
Major environmental–biodiversity changes and new developments in technology have changed the way we live, work and how we create our future. The main attention of biodiversity rese...
The business case for investing in biodiversity data
The business case for investing in biodiversity data
1. The private sector is increasingly aware of its dependence on biodiversity and the financial risks and opportunities involved. This has generated a lot of demand for investing i...
Soil biodiversity
Soil biodiversity
About this collection This Collection is the work of more than 50 scientists and Young Reviewers from all around the globe. Our role as editors, together with the authors, was to s...
Biodiversity Information Standards (TDWG): Social and Conceptual Infrastructure for Integrating Biodiversity Information
Biodiversity Information Standards (TDWG): Social and Conceptual Infrastructure for Integrating Biodiversity Information
The International Working Group on Taxonomic Databases (TDWG)*1 was established in 1985 to promote biodiversity data sharing and collaboration among organizations, projects, and pe...
Impact of Biodiversity Risk on Bank Lending
Impact of Biodiversity Risk on Bank Lending
AbstractThis study focuses on the consequences of the threat of biodiversity loss for bank lending in the US economy. Enlarged biodiversity risks are expected to reduce bank lendin...
The biodiversity of ice‐free Antarctica database
The biodiversity of ice‐free Antarctica database
AbstractAntarctica is one of Earth's most untouched, inhospitable, and poorly known regions. Although knowledge of its biodiversity has increased over recent decades, a diverse, wi...
An Investigation of Secondary School Students’ Biodiversity Literacy Level
An Investigation of Secondary School Students’ Biodiversity Literacy Level
The quality of life sustained by human beings is largely possible thanks to the opportunities offered by the biodiversity resources in nature. It is widely accepted that the contin...
Participatory monitoring of biodiversity in East African grazing lands
Participatory monitoring of biodiversity in East African grazing lands
AbstractThere are disagreements on the use of standard biodiversity monitoring methods to promote community participation. This study combined three methods to investigate question...

