Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Nikolaj Berdjaev et Sergej Bulgakov face à Picasso

View through CrossRef
Nikolaj Berdjaev and Sergej Bulgakov Confront Picasso Very early on, Russian critics and thinkers began to contemplate a new form of art, conventionally named 'Cubism,' consisting of a geometrization of the objective world. The most illustrious exponent of this new form was Spanish painter Pablo Picasso. In 1914, two representatives of Russian religious philosophy, N. A. Berdjaev and S. N. Bulgakov, dedicated articles to Picasso. In the present essay, the author attempts to bring to light the main elements of the reception of Picasso's work by the two Russian thinkers. He also highlights the influence of the analyses of French critics and essayists, particularly Jacques Rivière, on them. The author then examines Berdjaev and Bulgakov’s responses to the 1913 exhibition of S. I. Ščukin’s famous collection of French art, which took place in his mansion and was dominated by the works of Matisse and Picasso. Berdjaev and Bulgakov recognize Picasso’s genius, but for them, it is a demonie genius that distorts ail notions of Beauty. Looking back to the magnificent examples of the Renaissance, Berdjaev laments the loss of everlasting embodied beauty and the distortion of the female form. Не insists that Picasso’s work is not the beginning of a new art, but the end of an entire era in which the beauty of the flesh was the measure of art. For his part, Bulgakov speaks about 'the corpse of beauty' and the abominable, scandalous, diabolical work of Picasso. For him, as for Berdjaev, the artistic form is not subject to fundamental transformation, and both see in Cubism and Futurism a 'crisis of art', a sort of illness. The Russo-Ukrainian painter and theorist A. Grischenko, however, correctly noted that the problem is not a 'crisis of art', but a crisis of the approach to art. Despite their overall negative reaction to Picasso’s work, Berdjaev and Bulgakov took his creation of a new world vision seriously. It is interesting and paradoxical to note that the debate that took place at the beginning of the 20th century over the corporeal measure of art, as opposed to its dematerialization, re- appeared at the end of the century, particularly in the work of essayist Jean Clair. Clair, until recently director of the Picasso Museum in Paris, began to lead a war against abstraction and conceptual art in the name of this same corporeal measure of art, the perfect example of which is the author of Les Demoiselles d’Avignon...
Title: Nikolaj Berdjaev et Sergej Bulgakov face à Picasso
Description:
Nikolaj Berdjaev and Sergej Bulgakov Confront Picasso Very early on, Russian critics and thinkers began to contemplate a new form of art, conventionally named 'Cubism,' consisting of a geometrization of the objective world.
The most illustrious exponent of this new form was Spanish painter Pablo Picasso.
In 1914, two representatives of Russian religious philosophy, N.
A.
Berdjaev and S.
N.
Bulgakov, dedicated articles to Picasso.
In the present essay, the author attempts to bring to light the main elements of the reception of Picasso's work by the two Russian thinkers.
He also highlights the influence of the analyses of French critics and essayists, particularly Jacques Rivière, on them.
The author then examines Berdjaev and Bulgakov’s responses to the 1913 exhibition of S.
I.
Ščukin’s famous collection of French art, which took place in his mansion and was dominated by the works of Matisse and Picasso.
Berdjaev and Bulgakov recognize Picasso’s genius, but for them, it is a demonie genius that distorts ail notions of Beauty.
Looking back to the magnificent examples of the Renaissance, Berdjaev laments the loss of everlasting embodied beauty and the distortion of the female form.
Не insists that Picasso’s work is not the beginning of a new art, but the end of an entire era in which the beauty of the flesh was the measure of art.
For his part, Bulgakov speaks about 'the corpse of beauty' and the abominable, scandalous, diabolical work of Picasso.
For him, as for Berdjaev, the artistic form is not subject to fundamental transformation, and both see in Cubism and Futurism a 'crisis of art', a sort of illness.
The Russo-Ukrainian painter and theorist A.
Grischenko, however, correctly noted that the problem is not a 'crisis of art', but a crisis of the approach to art.
Despite their overall negative reaction to Picasso’s work, Berdjaev and Bulgakov took his creation of a new world vision seriously.
It is interesting and paradoxical to note that the debate that took place at the beginning of the 20th century over the corporeal measure of art, as opposed to its dematerialization, re- appeared at the end of the century, particularly in the work of essayist Jean Clair.
Clair, until recently director of the Picasso Museum in Paris, began to lead a war against abstraction and conceptual art in the name of this same corporeal measure of art, the perfect example of which is the author of Les Demoiselles d’Avignon.

Related Results

LA CREAZIONE SECONDO SERGEJ BULGAKOV
LA CREAZIONE SECONDO SERGEJ BULGAKOV
«Dio creò il mondo». Questa verità non riguarda soltanto un inizio puntuale, nel quale il creato fu chiamato dal nulla all’esistenza. La teologia della creazio...
Beauty and Art in Solovjev (1850–1903) and in Bulgakov (1874–1948). Does Beauty Save the World?
Beauty and Art in Solovjev (1850–1903) and in Bulgakov (1874–1948). Does Beauty Save the World?
In Solovjev beauty is substance. He suggests „beauty” and „the good” to be Siamese twins and predicts that beauty will transform „material being” to a „moral order”, thus saves the...
Mikhail Bulgakov and Vladik avkaz. The play The Sons of the Mullah [Synovia mully] and its Ossetic translation
Mikhail Bulgakov and Vladik avkaz. The play The Sons of the Mullah [Synovia mully] and its Ossetic translation
The article is concerned with a little-researched period in the life of M. Bulgakov, who spent 1919 to 1921 in Vladikavkaz. The study discusses the reasons for his settling in the ...
Bulgakov on Gender
Bulgakov on Gender
This article discusses Sergei Bulgakov’s theological view on gender and examines the extent to which his Trinitarian approach can be considered a response to the feminist charge of...
Scientific legacy of Sergej Zilitinkevich for boundary layer research and modelling
Scientific legacy of Sergej Zilitinkevich for boundary layer research and modelling
<p>Last year the scientific community lost a great scientist; leader in environmental turbulence and planetary boundary layer research; recipient of the 2019 Internat...
Sergii Bulgakov’s Linguistic Trinity*
Sergii Bulgakov’s Linguistic Trinity*
AbstractAs the work of Sergii Bulgakov has become more widely available in English, his Trinitarian theology has become a subject of particular interest. This article analyses his ...
Sergii Bulgakov's ‘Sofiologiia smerti’
Sergii Bulgakov's ‘Sofiologiia smerti’
AbstractThis article examines S. Bulgakov's treatise ‘Sofiologiia smerti’ (‘Sophiology of Death’), which has been relatively neglected by scholars. Death is a topic that recurs wit...

Back to Top