Javascript must be enabled to continue!
SOUTH CAUCASUS IN THE NETWORK OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
View through CrossRef
The article considers the problems of divisive lines, separating nations and diminishing prospects of shared prosperity in South Caucasus. Following the collapse of the Soviet Union and the resultant independence for Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia, the South Caucasus has primarily been associated with conflicts, hostility, military actions, closed borders. The article highlights the causes of problems and directions for their solutions. An assessment of the development potential of the South Caucasus’and tendencies of establishing a stable and secure space with broad prospects for economic cooperation in the region based on geopolitical and geo-economic opportunities is made. Arguments are based on variety of different factors, such as the facts that the region has inexhaustible transit and tourist potential, important natural resources of international significance, and an educated, relatively cheap labour force. Attemps are made to resolve issues such as prospects for the South Caucasus to become an attractive region, determined desirable further actions of the regional states and external players (Russia, United States of America, European Union) which are necessary to achieve a result. Expanding European principles, standards and criteria for cooperation in the South Caucasus is the most realistic way for the three states to achieve shared success. Nothing better has been offered in practice with respect to international regional cooperation. The future of the South Caucasus primarily depends on the three states themselves, their ability and vision, the capacity to observe the overall picture of regional developments and assist each other, and shared activity in order to help the population of the states perceive a new reality. The stable and integrated South Caucasus will make a serious contribution to the security system in a broader regional context and will bring greater stability in adjacent areas.
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
Title: SOUTH CAUCASUS IN THE NETWORK OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Description:
The article considers the problems of divisive lines, separating nations and diminishing prospects of shared prosperity in South Caucasus.
Following the collapse of the Soviet Union and the resultant independence for Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia, the South Caucasus has primarily been associated with conflicts, hostility, military actions, closed borders.
The article highlights the causes of problems and directions for their solutions.
An assessment of the development potential of the South Caucasus’and tendencies of establishing a stable and secure space with broad prospects for economic cooperation in the region based on geopolitical and geo-economic opportunities is made.
Arguments are based on variety of different factors, such as the facts that the region has inexhaustible transit and tourist potential, important natural resources of international significance, and an educated, relatively cheap labour force.
Attemps are made to resolve issues such as prospects for the South Caucasus to become an attractive region, determined desirable further actions of the regional states and external players (Russia, United States of America, European Union) which are necessary to achieve a result.
Expanding European principles, standards and criteria for cooperation in the South Caucasus is the most realistic way for the three states to achieve shared success.
Nothing better has been offered in practice with respect to international regional cooperation.
The future of the South Caucasus primarily depends on the three states themselves, their ability and vision, the capacity to observe the overall picture of regional developments and assist each other, and shared activity in order to help the population of the states perceive a new reality.
The stable and integrated South Caucasus will make a serious contribution to the security system in a broader regional context and will bring greater stability in adjacent areas.
Related Results
Lithospheric structure of the Eastern Anatolia and Caucasus region
Lithospheric structure of the Eastern Anatolia and Caucasus region
This dissertation investigates the lithospheric structure of the Eastern Anatolia and Caucasus region through an integrated approach employing Two-Plane Wave Tomography (TPWT), Amb...
Mindy Calling: Size, Beauty, Race in The Mindy Project
Mindy Calling: Size, Beauty, Race in The Mindy Project
When characters in the Fox Television sitcom The Mindy Project call Mindy Lahiri fat, Mindy sees it as a case of misidentification. She reminds the character that she is a “petite ...
OVERVIEW OF POLISH EPIGRAPHY IN THE CAUCASUS
OVERVIEW OF POLISH EPIGRAPHY IN THE CAUCASUS
The issue of Polish epigraphy in the Caucasus is still very poorly understood and until now no one of the scientists has attempted to analyze this phenomenon. This is probably due ...
Geochemistry and chemical U-Pb dating of U-Th mineralization of the Shkhara crystalline massif, Greater Caucasus, Georgia
Geochemistry and chemical U-Pb dating of U-Th mineralization of the Shkhara crystalline massif, Greater Caucasus, Georgia
The Greater Caucasus orogenic belt is the northernmost expression of the Caucasus and is linked to the southern 1Institute of Earth Sciences margin of the Precambrian Scythian Plat...
Bridging the Divide: Marriage Politics across the Caucasus
Bridging the Divide: Marriage Politics across the Caucasus
The early relationships between the polities of Armenia and K‘art‘li in the South Caucasus and their neighbours in the North Caucasus is a central, but underappreciated, factor in ...
Colorectal cancer prevention in Central, Eastern European and South Caucasus countries: a review of policy approaches
Colorectal cancer prevention in Central, Eastern European and South Caucasus countries: a review of policy approaches
PurposeThis study aims to examine the availability and comprehensiveness of policies pertaining to colorectal cancer (CRC) in Central, Eastern European and South Caucasus countries...
The Caucasus in Russian foreign policy strategy
The Caucasus in Russian foreign policy strategy
The Caucasus has always been a formative region for Russian foreign policy-making. While the North Caucasus has retained its position as Russia’s most fragile and politically insta...
The Russian-Chechen relations in XVI–XVII centuries
The Russian-Chechen relations in XVI–XVII centuries
The following paper investigates the Russian-Chechen relations in XVIXVII centuries. The authors note that the Caucasus was in the sphere of Russian foreign policy at the time of t...

