Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Comparative effects of cilazapril, carvedilol and their combination in preventing from left ventricular remodelling after acute myocardial infarction in rats
View through CrossRef
Objectives
To compare the effects of cilazapril, carvedilol and their combination in preventing left ventricular remodelling (LVRM) after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in rats.
Methods
Twenty-four hours after left coronary artery ligation, 100 surviving AMI female Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly assigned to: (1) AMI control (n=25); (2) cilazapril (Cila, 1 mg/kg/day) (n=25); (3) carvedilol (Car, 1 mg/kg/day) (n=25), and (4) cilazapril (1 mg/kg/day)+ carvedilol (1 mg/kg/day) (combination) (n=25) groups. A sham-operated group (n=17) was selected randomly as a non-infarction control. After four weeks of therapy with the drugs given by gastric gavage, haemodynamic studies were performed, following which the rat hearts were fixed and pathologically analysed. Rats with MI size <35% or >55% were excluded. Complete data were obtained in 64 rats, comprising AMI control (n=13), Cila (n=12), Car (n=12), Combination (n=14), and sham-operated (n=13) groups.
Results
There were no significant differences in MI size between the four AMI groups (45.2—46.7%, p>0.05). Compared with the sham-operated group, left ventricular (LV) end diastolic pressure (LVEDP), volume (LVV), weight (LVW), septal thickness (STh) and right ventricular weight (RVW) were all significantly increased (all p<0.001) in the AMI group, while the LV pressure maximal rate of rise and fall (±dp/dt) was significantly decreased (all p<0.001). In comparison with the AMI group, LVEDP, LVV, LVW, STh and RVW were all significantly decreased, while ±dp/dt was significantly increased in the Cila, Car, and combination groups, with LVEDP and STh decreasing more in the combination group than in the two monotherapy groups (p<0.05—0.01). There were no significant differences in other variables between the three therapy groups.
Conclusions
Cilazapril, carvedilol and their combination are all effective in preventing LVRM after AMI in rats, and in improving haemodynamics and LV function, with the combination therapy being superior to monotherapy in all respects.
Title: Comparative effects of cilazapril, carvedilol and their combination in preventing from left ventricular remodelling after acute myocardial infarction in rats
Description:
Objectives
To compare the effects of cilazapril, carvedilol and their combination in preventing left ventricular remodelling (LVRM) after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in rats.
Methods
Twenty-four hours after left coronary artery ligation, 100 surviving AMI female Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly assigned to: (1) AMI control (n=25); (2) cilazapril (Cila, 1 mg/kg/day) (n=25); (3) carvedilol (Car, 1 mg/kg/day) (n=25), and (4) cilazapril (1 mg/kg/day)+ carvedilol (1 mg/kg/day) (combination) (n=25) groups.
A sham-operated group (n=17) was selected randomly as a non-infarction control.
After four weeks of therapy with the drugs given by gastric gavage, haemodynamic studies were performed, following which the rat hearts were fixed and pathologically analysed.
Rats with MI size <35% or >55% were excluded.
Complete data were obtained in 64 rats, comprising AMI control (n=13), Cila (n=12), Car (n=12), Combination (n=14), and sham-operated (n=13) groups.
Results
There were no significant differences in MI size between the four AMI groups (45.
2—46.
7%, p>0.
05).
Compared with the sham-operated group, left ventricular (LV) end diastolic pressure (LVEDP), volume (LVV), weight (LVW), septal thickness (STh) and right ventricular weight (RVW) were all significantly increased (all p<0.
001) in the AMI group, while the LV pressure maximal rate of rise and fall (±dp/dt) was significantly decreased (all p<0.
001).
In comparison with the AMI group, LVEDP, LVV, LVW, STh and RVW were all significantly decreased, while ±dp/dt was significantly increased in the Cila, Car, and combination groups, with LVEDP and STh decreasing more in the combination group than in the two monotherapy groups (p<0.
05—0.
01).
There were no significant differences in other variables between the three therapy groups.
Conclusions
Cilazapril, carvedilol and their combination are all effective in preventing LVRM after AMI in rats, and in improving haemodynamics and LV function, with the combination therapy being superior to monotherapy in all respects.
Related Results
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Abstarct
Introduction
Isolated brain hydatid disease (BHD) is an extremely rare form of echinococcosis. A prompt and timely diagnosis is a crucial step in disease management. This ...
A simple LC-MS/MS method for pharmacokinetic study of carvedilol and 4/-hydroxyphenyl carvedilol at a low dose
A simple LC-MS/MS method for pharmacokinetic study of carvedilol and 4/-hydroxyphenyl carvedilol at a low dose
Background and purpose:
The study was aimed at validating a simple, rapid, and low-cost LC-MS/MS method for carvedilol and 4
...
Differing Beta-Blocking Effects of Carvedilol and Metoprolol
Differing Beta-Blocking Effects of Carvedilol and Metoprolol
Abstract
Background
Metoprolol is a beta1-selective beta-adrenergic antagonist while carvedilol is a non-selective beta-b...
Comparing Beta-Blocking Effects of Bisoprolol, Carvedilol and Nebivolol
Comparing Beta-Blocking Effects of Bisoprolol, Carvedilol and Nebivolol
<i>Objective:</i> Bisoprolol, carvedilol and nebivolol have been shown to be effective in the treatment of heart failure. However, the beta-blocking effects of these dr...
Abstract P338: Differences in Costs, Length of Stay and Mortality for Myocardial Infarction and Related Disorders in Non Federal Hospitals
Abstract P338: Differences in Costs, Length of Stay and Mortality for Myocardial Infarction and Related Disorders in Non Federal Hospitals
BACKGROUND:
Validated estimates of costs, length of stay, and mortality rates are necessary for the treatment and prevention of acute myocardial infarction in patient a...
Preventive role of carvedilol in adriamycin-induced cardiomyopathy
Preventive role of carvedilol in adriamycin-induced cardiomyopathy
Background & objectives:
Adriamycin though considered as an effective anticancer drug, leads to irreversible cardiomyopathy (CMP) and congestive heart failure (CHF)...
Carvedilol ameliorates experimental atherosclerosis by inhibiting the NLRP3 inflammasome
Carvedilol ameliorates experimental atherosclerosis by inhibiting the NLRP3 inflammasome
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the protective effect of carvedilol against atherosclerosis by inhibiting the NLRP3 inflammasome.
Methods:In vitro experiments, human umb...
e0432 An essential role of serum B-type natriuretic peptide in patients with acute inferior myocardial infarction
e0432 An essential role of serum B-type natriuretic peptide in patients with acute inferior myocardial infarction
Objective
To investigate the relationship between the level of serum B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and right ventricular infarction in patient s with acute inf...

