Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Differing Beta-Blocking Effects of Carvedilol and Metoprolol
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Background
Metoprolol is a beta1-selective beta-adrenergic antagonist while carvedilol is a non-selective beta-blocker with additional blockades of alpha1-adrenoceptors. Administration of metoprolol has been shown to cause up-regulation of beta-adrenoceptor density and to decrease nocturnal melatonin release, whereas carvedilol lacks these typical effects of beta-blocking drugs.
Aims
To compare beta-blocking effects of metoprolol and carvedilol when applied orally in healthy subjects.
Methods
We investigated the effects of single oral doses of clinically recommended amounts of metoprolol (50, 100 and 200 mg) and carvedilol (25, 50 and 100 mg) to those of a placebo in a randomised, double-blind, cross-over study in 12 healthy male volunteers. Two hours after oral administration of the drugs heart rate and blood pressure were measured at rest, after 10 min of exercise, and after 15 min of recovery.
Results
Metoprolol tended to decrease heart rate during exercise (−21%, −25% and −24%) to a greater extent than carvedilol (−16%, −16% and −18%). At rest, increasing doses of metoprolol caused decreasing heart rates (62, 60 and 58 beats/min) whereas increasing doses of carvedilol caused increasing heart rates (62, 66 and 69 beats/min), 50 and 100 mg carvedilol failed to differ significantly from the placebo (71 beats/min).
Conclusions
We conclude that clinically recommended doses of carvedilol cause a clinically relevant beta-blockade in humans predominantly during exercise where it appears to be slightly (although not significantly) less effective than metoprolol. On the other hand, the effects of carvedilol on heart rate at rest appear rather weak, particularly in subjects with a low sympathetic tone. This might be caused by a reflex increase on sympathetic drive secondary to peripheral vasodilation resulting from the alpha-blocking effects of the drug. These results might be helpful in explaining why carvedilol, in contrast to metoprolol, may fail to cause up-regulation of beta-adrenoceptor density and does not decrease nocturnal melatonin release. This, in turn, may be a reason for the weak side-effects of carvedilol resulting from the beta-blockade. In addition, our data might be of interest in the interpretation of the forthcoming results of the COMET trial, although it has to be emphasised that they were derived from healthy subjects and, therefore, cannot be directly extrapolated to patients with heart failure.
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Title: Differing Beta-Blocking Effects of Carvedilol and Metoprolol
Description:
Abstract
Background
Metoprolol is a beta1-selective beta-adrenergic antagonist while carvedilol is a non-selective beta-blocker with additional blockades of alpha1-adrenoceptors.
Administration of metoprolol has been shown to cause up-regulation of beta-adrenoceptor density and to decrease nocturnal melatonin release, whereas carvedilol lacks these typical effects of beta-blocking drugs.
Aims
To compare beta-blocking effects of metoprolol and carvedilol when applied orally in healthy subjects.
Methods
We investigated the effects of single oral doses of clinically recommended amounts of metoprolol (50, 100 and 200 mg) and carvedilol (25, 50 and 100 mg) to those of a placebo in a randomised, double-blind, cross-over study in 12 healthy male volunteers.
Two hours after oral administration of the drugs heart rate and blood pressure were measured at rest, after 10 min of exercise, and after 15 min of recovery.
Results
Metoprolol tended to decrease heart rate during exercise (−21%, −25% and −24%) to a greater extent than carvedilol (−16%, −16% and −18%).
At rest, increasing doses of metoprolol caused decreasing heart rates (62, 60 and 58 beats/min) whereas increasing doses of carvedilol caused increasing heart rates (62, 66 and 69 beats/min), 50 and 100 mg carvedilol failed to differ significantly from the placebo (71 beats/min).
Conclusions
We conclude that clinically recommended doses of carvedilol cause a clinically relevant beta-blockade in humans predominantly during exercise where it appears to be slightly (although not significantly) less effective than metoprolol.
On the other hand, the effects of carvedilol on heart rate at rest appear rather weak, particularly in subjects with a low sympathetic tone.
This might be caused by a reflex increase on sympathetic drive secondary to peripheral vasodilation resulting from the alpha-blocking effects of the drug.
These results might be helpful in explaining why carvedilol, in contrast to metoprolol, may fail to cause up-regulation of beta-adrenoceptor density and does not decrease nocturnal melatonin release.
This, in turn, may be a reason for the weak side-effects of carvedilol resulting from the beta-blockade.
In addition, our data might be of interest in the interpretation of the forthcoming results of the COMET trial, although it has to be emphasised that they were derived from healthy subjects and, therefore, cannot be directly extrapolated to patients with heart failure.
Related Results
Comparing Beta-Blocking Effects of Bisoprolol, Carvedilol and Nebivolol
Comparing Beta-Blocking Effects of Bisoprolol, Carvedilol and Nebivolol
<i>Objective:</i> Bisoprolol, carvedilol and nebivolol have been shown to be effective in the treatment of heart failure. However, the beta-blocking effects of these dr...
A simple LC-MS/MS method for pharmacokinetic study of carvedilol and 4/-hydroxyphenyl carvedilol at a low dose
A simple LC-MS/MS method for pharmacokinetic study of carvedilol and 4/-hydroxyphenyl carvedilol at a low dose
Background and purpose:
The study was aimed at validating a simple, rapid, and low-cost LC-MS/MS method for carvedilol and 4
...
Remarkable diversity of the lichen family Graphidaceae in the Amazon rain forest of Rondônia, Brazil
Remarkable diversity of the lichen family Graphidaceae in the Amazon rain forest of Rondônia, Brazil
In a continuation of our investigation of lichenized fungi in Rondônia and adjacent areas, we present a preliminary treatment of the graphidoid and thelotremoid core Graphidaceae (...
Carvedilol ameliorates experimental atherosclerosis by inhibiting the NLRP3 inflammasome
Carvedilol ameliorates experimental atherosclerosis by inhibiting the NLRP3 inflammasome
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the protective effect of carvedilol against atherosclerosis by inhibiting the NLRP3 inflammasome.
Methods:In vitro experiments, human umb...
Preventive role of carvedilol in adriamycin-induced cardiomyopathy
Preventive role of carvedilol in adriamycin-induced cardiomyopathy
Background & objectives:
Adriamycin though considered as an effective anticancer drug, leads to irreversible cardiomyopathy (CMP) and congestive heart failure (CHF)...
The dose dependency of the alpha‐ and beta‐adrenoceptor antagonist activity of carvedilol in man.
The dose dependency of the alpha‐ and beta‐adrenoceptor antagonist activity of carvedilol in man.
1. The alpha‐ and beta‐adrenoceptor antagonist activity of carvedilol, a beta‐adrenoceptor antagonist with vasodilating properties, and labetalol were investigated in 10 healthy ma...
Carvedilol versus propranolol in the prevention of variceal rebleeding in hepatosplenic schistosomiasis: Efficacy and safety
Carvedilol versus propranolol in the prevention of variceal rebleeding in hepatosplenic schistosomiasis: Efficacy and safety
AbstractBackground and AimBeta blockers combined with endoscopic variceal band ligation (EVL) is the most effective means for the prevention of variceal rebleeding. No data are ava...
Carvedilol Versus Propranolol in the Prevention of Variceal Rebleeding in Hepatic Schistosomiasis: Efficacy and Safety
Carvedilol Versus Propranolol in the Prevention of Variceal Rebleeding in Hepatic Schistosomiasis: Efficacy and Safety
Abstract
Background: The betablockers combined with endoscopic variceal band ligation (EVL) is the most effective prevention of variceal rebleeding. The aim of this study i...

