Javascript must be enabled to continue!
QLTI-15. MEDICAL MALPRACTICE AND GLIOMA
View through CrossRef
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Medical malpractice affects the practice of medicine in every field and specialty. It is a particular concern in high risk specialties including neurological surgery, which has the greatest risk of malpractice litigation. Treatment of glioma patients is complex and requires diagnosis based on presentation and imaging, followed by the decision of resection versus biopsy to confirm diagnosis and potentially improve prognosis. The possibility of a complication accompanies every procedure and patients generally also go on to receive chemotherapy and radiation. Interdisciplinary care is a hallmark. We explored medical malpractice litigation pertaining to gliomas with a focus on outcomes and the role of the defendants as well as the liabilities prompting litigation.
METHODS
WestLaw Precision, an established legal database, was queried for all cases relevant to “glioma” occurring since 2000. Cases and settlements, in particular, were considered. Keywords included “glioma” and “medical malpractice” with the date range including all cases after January 1, 2000. Cases were identified and analyzed for variables of interest.
RESULTS
Fourteen relevant cases were identified and reviewed. There were three plaintiff verdicts, one settlement and ten defense verdicts in favor of the defense. Two cases involved minors, while all others concerned adults. Both cases pertaining to the care of minors with gliomas resulted in findings for the defense. The majority of cases centered on failure to diagnose occurring before surgery or treatment. Defendants included neurosurgeons, pathologists, radiologists, nurses and hospital systems. Although the number of cases considered here is small, jury verdicts in favor of plaintiffs resulted in far higher payouts compared with settlements.
CONCLUSIONS
Medical malpractice allegations relating to glioma treatment are shown to be rare and infrequent. The majority of cases alleged a failure to appropriately diagnose, before surgery or treatment took place. The great majority of cases reported within WestLaw Precision resulted in jury verdicts for the defense.
Title: QLTI-15. MEDICAL MALPRACTICE AND GLIOMA
Description:
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Medical malpractice affects the practice of medicine in every field and specialty.
It is a particular concern in high risk specialties including neurological surgery, which has the greatest risk of malpractice litigation.
Treatment of glioma patients is complex and requires diagnosis based on presentation and imaging, followed by the decision of resection versus biopsy to confirm diagnosis and potentially improve prognosis.
The possibility of a complication accompanies every procedure and patients generally also go on to receive chemotherapy and radiation.
Interdisciplinary care is a hallmark.
We explored medical malpractice litigation pertaining to gliomas with a focus on outcomes and the role of the defendants as well as the liabilities prompting litigation.
METHODS
WestLaw Precision, an established legal database, was queried for all cases relevant to “glioma” occurring since 2000.
Cases and settlements, in particular, were considered.
Keywords included “glioma” and “medical malpractice” with the date range including all cases after January 1, 2000.
Cases were identified and analyzed for variables of interest.
RESULTS
Fourteen relevant cases were identified and reviewed.
There were three plaintiff verdicts, one settlement and ten defense verdicts in favor of the defense.
Two cases involved minors, while all others concerned adults.
Both cases pertaining to the care of minors with gliomas resulted in findings for the defense.
The majority of cases centered on failure to diagnose occurring before surgery or treatment.
Defendants included neurosurgeons, pathologists, radiologists, nurses and hospital systems.
Although the number of cases considered here is small, jury verdicts in favor of plaintiffs resulted in far higher payouts compared with settlements.
CONCLUSIONS
Medical malpractice allegations relating to glioma treatment are shown to be rare and infrequent.
The majority of cases alleged a failure to appropriately diagnose, before surgery or treatment took place.
The great majority of cases reported within WestLaw Precision resulted in jury verdicts for the defense.
Related Results
Characteristics of the medical malpractice cases against orthopedists in China between 2016 and 2017
Characteristics of the medical malpractice cases against orthopedists in China between 2016 and 2017
Background
This study aimed to identify the most frequent reasons for orthopedic medical malpractice, gain insight into the related patient demographics and clinical characteristic...
Implementation Of Criminal Actions Against Malpractice By Medical Personnel
Implementation Of Criminal Actions Against Malpractice By Medical Personnel
Providing health services to the community is very important, where every community must get proper health services and according to permission from the government. However, in ter...
PLEKHA4 is a prognostic biomarker and correlated with immune infiltrates in glioma
PLEKHA4 is a prognostic biomarker and correlated with immune infiltrates in glioma
Abstract
Background
Gliomas are the most common and life-threatening intracranial tumors. Immune-infiltration of the tumor microenvironment significantly affects tumor pro...
Modeling and Analysis of Population Dynamics of Examination Malpractice Among Students
Modeling and Analysis of Population Dynamics of Examination Malpractice Among Students
While examination malpractice has been a recognized social problem among students, the control of the phenomenon remains a challenge. In this study, we formulate a mathematical mod...
Analisis Hukum Pidana dalam Penanganan Tindak Pidana Malapraktik Kedokteran (Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor: 871 K/Pid/2018)
Analisis Hukum Pidana dalam Penanganan Tindak Pidana Malapraktik Kedokteran (Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor: 871 K/Pid/2018)
Data from the Indonesian Medical Discipline Honorary Council (MKDKI) shows that cases of malpractice by obstetricians are quite high. For example, a malpractice case that reached t...
Medical malpractice litigations against gastroenterologists in Belgium
Medical malpractice litigations against gastroenterologists in Belgium
Introduction: Medical malpractice litigations represent a reality for clinical physicians. However, no data are available about the impact on gastroenterologists in Belgium.
Aim: ...
Induction of prostaglandin E2 synthesis and microsomal prostaglandin E synthase–1 expression in murine microglia by glioma-derived soluble factors
Induction of prostaglandin E2 synthesis and microsomal prostaglandin E synthase–1 expression in murine microglia by glioma-derived soluble factors
Object
Microglia are one of the members of monocyte/macrophage lineage in the central nervous system (CNS) and exist as ramified microglia in a normal resting state, but they are a...
1H-MR spectroscopy in grading of cerebral glioma: A new view point, MRS image quality assessment
1H-MR spectroscopy in grading of cerebral glioma: A new view point, MRS image quality assessment
Background Noninvasive preoperative prediction of histological grading is essential for clinical management of cerebral glioma. Purpose This study aimed to investigate the associat...

