Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

P2529Efficacy and safety of oral anticoagulation in nonagenarian patients with atrial fibrillation

View through CrossRef
Abstract Introduction Embolic prevention with oral anticoagulation is the cornerstone for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, data about the efficacy and safety of oral anticoagulation in nonagenarian patients are limited. We aimed to analyze the impact of oral anticoagulation in mortality, embolic and hemorrhagic events, in patients ≥90 years with non-valvular AF. Methods We used data from a multicentric registry of 1,750 consecutive nonagenarian patients diagnosed of AF between 2013 and 2018. A propensity-matched analysis was performed to match the baseline characteristics of patients treated or not with oral anticoagulants, and for those treated with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) vs direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). The impact of oral anticoagulation in the embolic and hemorrhagic risk was assessed by a competitive risk analysis, using a Fine and Gray regression model, with death being the competitive event. For embolic risk, we have considered a stroke, pulmonary or peripheral embolism. For bleeding risk, we have considered any bleeding requiring hospital admission. Results The mean of CHA2DS2-VASC and HASBLED scores was 4.5±1.3 and 2.8±1.0 points, respectively. Most of patients were anticoagulated (70.1%; n=1,256). DOACs were used in 709 patients, and VKAs in 517 patients. During a median follow-up of 25.2 months (IQR 12.2–44.3 months), 988 patients died (56.5%), 180 presented embolic events (10.3%), 186 had bleeding events (10.6%), and 29 had intracranial hemorrhage (ICH, 1.7%). After propensity-score matching, anticoagulation (versus non anticoagulation) was associated with lower mortality rate (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.60–0.89; p=0.002), less mortality and embolic events (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.64–0.92; p=0.005), but more bleeding events (HR 2.05, 95% CI 1.25–3.35; p=0.004). In comparison with VKAs, DOACs showed similar risk of mortality and embolic events (HR 1.14, 95% CI 0.88–1.47; p=0.337), and similar risk of bleeding events (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.43–1.28; p=0.287), although a trend to lower risk of ICH was found (HR 0.17, 95% CI 0.02–1.39; p=0.097). Conclusions Among nonagenarian patients with AF, oral anticoagulation was associated with lower all-cause mortality. Although survival free of embolic events was significantly higher in patients with anticoagulation, the risk of major bleeding was twice than in non-anticoagulated patients. There was not differences between VKAs and DOACs in terms of embolic events and total major bleeding. However, compared with VKAs, DOACs were showed a trend to lower risk of ICH.
Title: P2529Efficacy and safety of oral anticoagulation in nonagenarian patients with atrial fibrillation
Description:
Abstract Introduction Embolic prevention with oral anticoagulation is the cornerstone for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).
However, data about the efficacy and safety of oral anticoagulation in nonagenarian patients are limited.
We aimed to analyze the impact of oral anticoagulation in mortality, embolic and hemorrhagic events, in patients ≥90 years with non-valvular AF.
Methods We used data from a multicentric registry of 1,750 consecutive nonagenarian patients diagnosed of AF between 2013 and 2018.
A propensity-matched analysis was performed to match the baseline characteristics of patients treated or not with oral anticoagulants, and for those treated with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) vs direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs).
The impact of oral anticoagulation in the embolic and hemorrhagic risk was assessed by a competitive risk analysis, using a Fine and Gray regression model, with death being the competitive event.
For embolic risk, we have considered a stroke, pulmonary or peripheral embolism.
For bleeding risk, we have considered any bleeding requiring hospital admission.
Results The mean of CHA2DS2-VASC and HASBLED scores was 4.
5±1.
3 and 2.
8±1.
0 points, respectively.
Most of patients were anticoagulated (70.
1%; n=1,256).
DOACs were used in 709 patients, and VKAs in 517 patients.
During a median follow-up of 25.
2 months (IQR 12.
2–44.
3 months), 988 patients died (56.
5%), 180 presented embolic events (10.
3%), 186 had bleeding events (10.
6%), and 29 had intracranial hemorrhage (ICH, 1.
7%).
After propensity-score matching, anticoagulation (versus non anticoagulation) was associated with lower mortality rate (HR 0.
73, 95% CI 0.
60–0.
89; p=0.
002), less mortality and embolic events (HR 0.
77, 95% CI 0.
64–0.
92; p=0.
005), but more bleeding events (HR 2.
05, 95% CI 1.
25–3.
35; p=0.
004).
In comparison with VKAs, DOACs showed similar risk of mortality and embolic events (HR 1.
14, 95% CI 0.
88–1.
47; p=0.
337), and similar risk of bleeding events (HR 0.
75, 95% CI 0.
43–1.
28; p=0.
287), although a trend to lower risk of ICH was found (HR 0.
17, 95% CI 0.
02–1.
39; p=0.
097).
Conclusions Among nonagenarian patients with AF, oral anticoagulation was associated with lower all-cause mortality.
Although survival free of embolic events was significantly higher in patients with anticoagulation, the risk of major bleeding was twice than in non-anticoagulated patients.
There was not differences between VKAs and DOACs in terms of embolic events and total major bleeding.
However, compared with VKAs, DOACs were showed a trend to lower risk of ICH.

Related Results

Rethinking Anticoagulation in Kidney Disease and Kidney Transplantation
Rethinking Anticoagulation in Kidney Disease and Kidney Transplantation
BackgroundA clinical dilemma exists in patients with CKD, ESKD, and after kidney transplantation, as they face concurrent risks of both thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications...
Inter‐Relationships Between Atrial Flutter and Atrial Fibrillation
Inter‐Relationships Between Atrial Flutter and Atrial Fibrillation
It has been appreciated for a long time that atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation have a clinical relationship. Now, with the technological advances that permit more sophisticate...
Left atrial appendage anatomy and function: short term response to sustained atrial fibrillation
Left atrial appendage anatomy and function: short term response to sustained atrial fibrillation
OBJECTIVE To determine whether there is significant atrial or atrial appendage enlargement or functional remodelling as a result of one to two months of sustained...
Adiponectin and Lone atrial fibrillation
Adiponectin and Lone atrial fibrillation
Objective: Lone atrial fibrillation is an idiopathic arrhythmia seen in younger individuals without any secondary disease. Adiponectin is an endogenous adipocytokine that increases...
Atrial Fibrillation, a Geriatric Giant
Atrial Fibrillation, a Geriatric Giant
The studies in the thesis apply opportunistic case-finding strategies for atrial fibrillation, and addresses physicians’ worries about anticoagulation and major bleeding. Within t...
Beyond Coronary Risk: Clinical Scores as Predictors of Atrial Fibrillation in Chronic Coronary Syndrome
Beyond Coronary Risk: Clinical Scores as Predictors of Atrial Fibrillation in Chronic Coronary Syndrome
Atrial fibrillation frequently coexists with chronic coronary syndrome, sharing common cardiovascular risk factors and pathophysiological mechanisms. Identifying patients with chro...

Back to Top