Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Clinical application of different cerebral protection devices in Carotid angioplasty and stenting in 1148 patients with carotid stenosis
View through CrossRef
Objective
To investigate the efficacy and safety of Carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) by different cerebral protection devices in 1148 patients with carotid stenosis.
Methods
Carotid angioplasty and stenting by different cerebral protection device were performed in 1148 patients with carotid artery stenosis from April 2003 to June 2007. There were 812 males and 336 females in all patients. Age were from 56 to 84 (average 68±5). Transient ischemia attach (TIA) occurred in 894 patients, and cerebral infarction (CI) occurred in 254 patients. Eight hundred and fifty four Angioguard (Cordis, Co.), 350 Spide (EV3, Co.), 25 Filterwire (Boston Scientific, Co.), 16 Emboshield (Abbott, Co.), eight MoMa (Invetech, Co.)and two Aether (MicroPort, Co.) were used in CAS.
Results
One thousand two hundred and fifty five cerebral protection device were successfully placed in internal carotid arteries with 1148 patients, 8 MoMa were placed respectively in external and common carotid artery. Predications were performed in 18 patients by Angioguard because of severe carotid stenosis. Cerebral protection device disrupture occurred in one patient during retrieve of Spide. The mean diameter of carotid stenosis was from (87.6±6.8)% to (18.9±10.8)% after CAS (p<0.01). No death and ischemic stroke or cerebral arterial thrombosis occurred in 684 patients during one year of follow-up.
Conclusions
By option usage of cerebral protection device, CAS be successfully performed in patients with carotid stenosis. Meanwhile, CAS is a safe and effective method and improve cerebral ischemia and prevent ischemic stroke.
Title: Clinical application of different cerebral protection devices in Carotid angioplasty and stenting in 1148 patients with carotid stenosis
Description:
Objective
To investigate the efficacy and safety of Carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) by different cerebral protection devices in 1148 patients with carotid stenosis.
Methods
Carotid angioplasty and stenting by different cerebral protection device were performed in 1148 patients with carotid artery stenosis from April 2003 to June 2007.
There were 812 males and 336 females in all patients.
Age were from 56 to 84 (average 68±5).
Transient ischemia attach (TIA) occurred in 894 patients, and cerebral infarction (CI) occurred in 254 patients.
Eight hundred and fifty four Angioguard (Cordis, Co.
), 350 Spide (EV3, Co.
), 25 Filterwire (Boston Scientific, Co.
), 16 Emboshield (Abbott, Co.
), eight MoMa (Invetech, Co.
)and two Aether (MicroPort, Co.
) were used in CAS.
Results
One thousand two hundred and fifty five cerebral protection device were successfully placed in internal carotid arteries with 1148 patients, 8 MoMa were placed respectively in external and common carotid artery.
Predications were performed in 18 patients by Angioguard because of severe carotid stenosis.
Cerebral protection device disrupture occurred in one patient during retrieve of Spide.
The mean diameter of carotid stenosis was from (87.
6±6.
8)% to (18.
9±10.
8)% after CAS (p<0.
01).
No death and ischemic stroke or cerebral arterial thrombosis occurred in 684 patients during one year of follow-up.
Conclusions
By option usage of cerebral protection device, CAS be successfully performed in patients with carotid stenosis.
Meanwhile, CAS is a safe and effective method and improve cerebral ischemia and prevent ischemic stroke.
Related Results
Determinants of Cerebrovascular Reserve in Patients with Significant Carotid Stenosis
Determinants of Cerebrovascular Reserve in Patients with Significant Carotid Stenosis
Abstract
Introduction
In patients with 70% to 99% diameter carotid artery stenosis cerebral blood flow reserve may be protectiv...
Carotid artery stenting without post-stenting angioplasty in patients with high risk for reperfusion injury (technical modification)
Carotid artery stenting without post-stenting angioplasty in patients with high risk for reperfusion injury (technical modification)
Abstract
Background
Cerebral Hyper perfusion Syndrome (CHS) is an ominous complication that can follow extracranial carotid artery revascularization. The most dangerous con...
Clinical and angiographic outcome after conventional angioplasty with optional stent implantation compared with direct stenting without predilatation
Clinical and angiographic outcome after conventional angioplasty with optional stent implantation compared with direct stenting without predilatation
Objective: To compare in a randomised trial the procedural and clinical outcome and long term patency of conventional angioplasty with optional stent implantation versus direct ste...
Cerebral Microemboli and Brain Injury During Carotid Artery Endarterectomy and Stenting
Cerebral Microemboli and Brain Injury During Carotid Artery Endarterectomy and Stenting
Background and Purpose—
Cerebral microembolic signals detected by transcranial Doppler are frequent during carotid angioplasty with stenting and carotid en...
Stenting of ultraembolic hazardous carotid stenotic lesions using the technique of triple antiembolic protection
Stenting of ultraembolic hazardous carotid stenotic lesions using the technique of triple antiembolic protection
Objective ‒ to develop a technique of triple antiembolic protection with the simultaneous use of proximal antiembolic protection systems, distal antiembolic filters and two-layer m...
A Preliminary Study of Wall Shear Stress in Carotid Artery Stenting
A Preliminary Study of Wall Shear Stress in Carotid Artery Stenting
Abstract
Objective: To characterize carotid wall shear stress (WSS)following carotid artery stenting (CAS) in patients with carotid stenosis.
Methods: Twenty-eight patient...
Critical Arterial Stenosis Revisited
Critical Arterial Stenosis Revisited
Abstract
Introduction
Stenosis of an organ/tissue primary artery can produce ischemia or only reduce blood flow reserve. Despit...
The Outcome of Self-expandable Metallic Stent for Malignant Tracheobronchial Stenosis Following Esophageal Stenting
The Outcome of Self-expandable Metallic Stent for Malignant Tracheobronchial Stenosis Following Esophageal Stenting
Abstract
Background: Tracheobronchial stenosis following esophageal stenting is rare. We aim to explore the outcome of SEMS for malignant tracheobronchial stenosis followin...

