Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Comparison Of Hyperbaric Bupivacaine In Conventional Dose To Isobaric Levobupivacaine Used For Infra Umbilical Surgeries
View through CrossRef
Background: For spinal anesthesia, levobupivacaine is considered an effective alternative anaesthetic agent to conventional bupivacaineowing to the faster recovery profile and lower probability of cardiovascular toxicity.Aim: To comparatively assess the analgesic and hemodynamic features of conventional dose of hyperbaric bupivacaine to isobariclevobupivacaine used for infra umbilical surgeries.Methods: The present clinical study included 120 subjects from ASA I and ASA II categories presented for elective infra umbilicalsurgeries and were randomly divided into 2 groups of 60 subjects each. Group, I subjects was given 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine atthe dose of 3ml, and Group II was given 0.5% isobaric levobupivacaine at the dose of 3ml. Hemodynamic parameters including SpO2,NIBP, and heart rates were assessed every 15 minutes till 2 hours postoperative. Side effects including nausea and vomiting,bradycardia, and hypotension were also evaluated.Results: Sensory block onset was slower in the levobupivacaine group and sensory block levels were comparable. For levobupivacaine,analgesia duration was significantly lower. With levobupivacaine, shorter motor blockade duration and slower motor blockade onsetwere seen. Complete motor blockade was seen in all subjects. Concerning hemodynamic parameters, lesser incidence of bradycardiaand hypotension and high cardiovascular stability. No incidence of PDPH, shivering, nausea, or vomiting was seen in any subject.Conclusion: The present study concludes that significantly similar effects concerning analgesia duration are seen with Bupivacaine aswith levobupivacaine. However, Bupivacaine showed better cardiovascular stability making Levobupivacaine use successful for lowerabdominal surgeries.
Title: Comparison Of Hyperbaric Bupivacaine In Conventional Dose To Isobaric Levobupivacaine Used For Infra Umbilical Surgeries
Description:
Background: For spinal anesthesia, levobupivacaine is considered an effective alternative anaesthetic agent to conventional bupivacaineowing to the faster recovery profile and lower probability of cardiovascular toxicity.
Aim: To comparatively assess the analgesic and hemodynamic features of conventional dose of hyperbaric bupivacaine to isobariclevobupivacaine used for infra umbilical surgeries.
Methods: The present clinical study included 120 subjects from ASA I and ASA II categories presented for elective infra umbilicalsurgeries and were randomly divided into 2 groups of 60 subjects each.
Group, I subjects was given 0.
5% hyperbaric bupivacaine atthe dose of 3ml, and Group II was given 0.
5% isobaric levobupivacaine at the dose of 3ml.
Hemodynamic parameters including SpO2,NIBP, and heart rates were assessed every 15 minutes till 2 hours postoperative.
Side effects including nausea and vomiting,bradycardia, and hypotension were also evaluated.
Results: Sensory block onset was slower in the levobupivacaine group and sensory block levels were comparable.
For levobupivacaine,analgesia duration was significantly lower.
With levobupivacaine, shorter motor blockade duration and slower motor blockade onsetwere seen.
Complete motor blockade was seen in all subjects.
Concerning hemodynamic parameters, lesser incidence of bradycardiaand hypotension and high cardiovascular stability.
No incidence of PDPH, shivering, nausea, or vomiting was seen in any subject.
Conclusion: The present study concludes that significantly similar effects concerning analgesia duration are seen with Bupivacaine aswith levobupivacaine.
However, Bupivacaine showed better cardiovascular stability making Levobupivacaine use successful for lowerabdominal surgeries.
Related Results
To compare the efficacy of hyperbaric levobupivacaine (0.5%) versus hyperbaric bupivacaine (0.5%) in the subarachnoid block for infraumbilical surgeries
To compare the efficacy of hyperbaric levobupivacaine (0.5%) versus hyperbaric bupivacaine (0.5%) in the subarachnoid block for infraumbilical surgeries
Background: Spinal anesthesia is the neuraxial regional anesthesia technique used in infraumbilical surgeries such as inguinal hernia, hydrocele, hysterectomy, and lower limb surge...
To compare the efficacy of hyperbaric levobupivacaine (0.5%) versus hyperbaric bupivacaine (0.5%) in the subarachnoid block for infraumbilical surgeries
To compare the efficacy of hyperbaric levobupivacaine (0.5%) versus hyperbaric bupivacaine (0.5%) in the subarachnoid block for infraumbilical surgeries
Background: Spinal anesthesia is the neuraxial regional anesthesia technique used in infraumbilical surgeries such as inguinal hernia, hydrocele, hysterectomy, and lower limb surge...
Enhancement of Analgesic Effect of Intrathecal Neostigmine and Clonidine on Bupivacaine Spinal Anesthesia
Enhancement of Analgesic Effect of Intrathecal Neostigmine and Clonidine on Bupivacaine Spinal Anesthesia
Background and Objectives
Intrathecal administration of neostigmine has been shown to produce analgesia in both animals and humans. The concurrent administration ...
Comparison of Mean Onset of Motor and Sensory Block of Isobaric Ropivacaine and Hyperbaric Bupivacaine for Elective Caesarean Sections at Tertiary Care Hospital, Karachi.
Comparison of Mean Onset of Motor and Sensory Block of Isobaric Ropivacaine and Hyperbaric Bupivacaine for Elective Caesarean Sections at Tertiary Care Hospital, Karachi.
Objective: To compare the mean onset time of motor and sensory block of Isobaric Ropivacaine and Hyperbaric Bupivacaine for elective caesarean sections at Tertiary Care Hospital, K...
Evaluation of low dose hyperbaric bupivacaine with or without fentanyl in perianal surgeries: A prospective randomized double blind trial
Evaluation of low dose hyperbaric bupivacaine with or without fentanyl in perianal surgeries: A prospective randomized double blind trial
Spinal anaesthesia should be ideal for perianal surgeries due to its quick onset, reliable anaesthesia with minimal supplies making it cost-effective technique with rapid turnover ...
Comparison of 0.5% Levobupivacaine Versus 0.5% Isobaric Levobupivacaine with 3mcg Dexmedetomidine in Spinal Anaesthesia- A Comparative Study
Comparison of 0.5% Levobupivacaine Versus 0.5% Isobaric Levobupivacaine with 3mcg Dexmedetomidine in Spinal Anaesthesia- A Comparative Study
Background: Effective postoperative pain control is an essential component of the care of the surgical patient. The present study was conducted to compare levobupivacaine 0.5% vers...
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE EFFECTS OF INTRATHECAL MIDAZOLAM(1MG) AND FENTANYL(25 MICROGRAMS) AS ADDITIVES TO INTRATHECAL HYPERBARIC BUPIVACAINE 0.5%(15MG) IN SPINALANAESTHESIA
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE EFFECTS OF INTRATHECAL MIDAZOLAM(1MG) AND FENTANYL(25 MICROGRAMS) AS ADDITIVES TO INTRATHECAL HYPERBARIC BUPIVACAINE 0.5%(15MG) IN SPINALANAESTHESIA
Background: Various intrathecal additives are added to local anesthetics to increase the speed of onset, improve the quality, and prolong the
inuence of spinal anesthesia. Midazol...
050419-OA- Spinal-Beena
050419-OA- Spinal-Beena
Background: Spinal anaesthesia is a reliable and safe technique for infra-umbilical surgeries. Preservative-free 2-chloroprocaine has re-emerged for use in spinal anaesthesia. We c...

