Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Comparison Of Hyperbaric Bupivacaine In Conventional Dose To Isobaric Levobupivacaine Used For Infra Umbilical Surgeries

View through CrossRef
Background: For spinal anesthesia, levobupivacaine is considered an effective alternative anaesthetic agent to conventional bupivacaineowing to the faster recovery profile and lower probability of cardiovascular toxicity.Aim: To comparatively assess the analgesic and hemodynamic features of conventional dose of hyperbaric bupivacaine to isobariclevobupivacaine used for infra umbilical surgeries.Methods: The present clinical study included 120 subjects from ASA I and ASA II categories presented for elective infra umbilicalsurgeries and were randomly divided into 2 groups of 60 subjects each. Group, I subjects was given 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine atthe dose of 3ml, and Group II was given 0.5% isobaric levobupivacaine at the dose of 3ml. Hemodynamic parameters including SpO2,NIBP, and heart rates were assessed every 15 minutes till 2 hours postoperative. Side effects including nausea and vomiting,bradycardia, and hypotension were also evaluated.Results: Sensory block onset was slower in the levobupivacaine group and sensory block levels were comparable. For levobupivacaine,analgesia duration was significantly lower. With levobupivacaine, shorter motor blockade duration and slower motor blockade onsetwere seen. Complete motor blockade was seen in all subjects. Concerning hemodynamic parameters, lesser incidence of bradycardiaand hypotension and high cardiovascular stability. No incidence of PDPH, shivering, nausea, or vomiting was seen in any subject.Conclusion: The present study concludes that significantly similar effects concerning analgesia duration are seen with Bupivacaine aswith levobupivacaine. However, Bupivacaine showed better cardiovascular stability making Levobupivacaine use successful for lowerabdominal surgeries.
Title: Comparison Of Hyperbaric Bupivacaine In Conventional Dose To Isobaric Levobupivacaine Used For Infra Umbilical Surgeries
Description:
Background: For spinal anesthesia, levobupivacaine is considered an effective alternative anaesthetic agent to conventional bupivacaineowing to the faster recovery profile and lower probability of cardiovascular toxicity.
Aim: To comparatively assess the analgesic and hemodynamic features of conventional dose of hyperbaric bupivacaine to isobariclevobupivacaine used for infra umbilical surgeries.
Methods: The present clinical study included 120 subjects from ASA I and ASA II categories presented for elective infra umbilicalsurgeries and were randomly divided into 2 groups of 60 subjects each.
Group, I subjects was given 0.
5% hyperbaric bupivacaine atthe dose of 3ml, and Group II was given 0.
5% isobaric levobupivacaine at the dose of 3ml.
Hemodynamic parameters including SpO2,NIBP, and heart rates were assessed every 15 minutes till 2 hours postoperative.
Side effects including nausea and vomiting,bradycardia, and hypotension were also evaluated.
Results: Sensory block onset was slower in the levobupivacaine group and sensory block levels were comparable.
For levobupivacaine,analgesia duration was significantly lower.
With levobupivacaine, shorter motor blockade duration and slower motor blockade onsetwere seen.
Complete motor blockade was seen in all subjects.
Concerning hemodynamic parameters, lesser incidence of bradycardiaand hypotension and high cardiovascular stability.
No incidence of PDPH, shivering, nausea, or vomiting was seen in any subject.
Conclusion: The present study concludes that significantly similar effects concerning analgesia duration are seen with Bupivacaine aswith levobupivacaine.
However, Bupivacaine showed better cardiovascular stability making Levobupivacaine use successful for lowerabdominal surgeries.

Related Results

Enhancement of Analgesic Effect of Intrathecal Neostigmine and Clonidine on Bupivacaine Spinal Anesthesia
Enhancement of Analgesic Effect of Intrathecal Neostigmine and Clonidine on Bupivacaine Spinal Anesthesia
Background and Objectives Intrathecal administration of neostigmine has been shown to produce analgesia in both animals and humans. The concurrent administration ...
050419-OA- Spinal-Beena
050419-OA- Spinal-Beena
Background: Spinal anaesthesia is a reliable and safe technique for infra-umbilical surgeries. Preservative-free 2-chloroprocaine has re-emerged for use in spinal anaesthesia. We c...
Nalbuphin as an Adjuvant to Levobupivacaine in Caudal Analgesia in Children
Nalbuphin as an Adjuvant to Levobupivacaine in Caudal Analgesia in Children
Abstract Background Caudal anethesia is the single most important pediatric regional anethetic technique and is increasingly per...
COMPARISON OF HYPERBARIC LEVOBUPIVACAINE/ BUPIVACAINE FOR CESEREAN SECTION
COMPARISON OF HYPERBARIC LEVOBUPIVACAINE/ BUPIVACAINE FOR CESEREAN SECTION
Background : Bupivacaine is the most popular local anesthetic agent in obstetric practice Levobupivacaine showed a lower risk of cardiovascular and central nervous system (CNS) tox...
To compare the efficacy of intrathecal 0.75% heavy ropivacaine and 0.5% heavy bupivacaine for lower abdominal and lower limb surgery
To compare the efficacy of intrathecal 0.75% heavy ropivacaine and 0.5% heavy bupivacaine for lower abdominal and lower limb surgery
Background: Spinal anesthesia is the most popular regional anesthesia technique for lower limb and lower abdominal surgery. Bupivacaine 0.5% heavy is commonly used for intrathecal ...

Back to Top