Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

قصہ غرانیق سے متعلق جولیس ولہاوزن کے افکار و نظریات کا تحقیقی و تنقیدی جائزہ A Research and Critical Analysis of Julius Wellhausen's Thoughts and Views on the “Story of Gharaniq”

View through CrossRef
The story of Gharaniq, also known as the "Story of the Cranes" or "Satanic Verses," is a controversial and fabricated narrative alleging that the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) was momentarily influenced by Satan, causing him to recite words praising pagan idols during revelation. Orientalists, like Julius Wellhausen, have used this story to criticize Islam and the Prophet, portraying it as a political compromise with the polytheists of Makkah. However, scholars and hadith experts unanimously reject the narrations from Tarikh al-Tabari about this incident, citing their weakness, inconsistency, and unreliability. The story is considered fabricated (Mawdu') and baseless, with no credible foundation in Islamic tradition. Attempts to propagate it are rooted in falsehood and hold no significance, as the integrity of the Quran and the Prophet (peace be upon him) remains firmly established.
Title: قصہ غرانیق سے متعلق جولیس ولہاوزن کے افکار و نظریات کا تحقیقی و تنقیدی جائزہ A Research and Critical Analysis of Julius Wellhausen's Thoughts and Views on the “Story of Gharaniq”
Description:
The story of Gharaniq, also known as the "Story of the Cranes" or "Satanic Verses," is a controversial and fabricated narrative alleging that the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) was momentarily influenced by Satan, causing him to recite words praising pagan idols during revelation.
Orientalists, like Julius Wellhausen, have used this story to criticize Islam and the Prophet, portraying it as a political compromise with the polytheists of Makkah.
However, scholars and hadith experts unanimously reject the narrations from Tarikh al-Tabari about this incident, citing their weakness, inconsistency, and unreliability.
The story is considered fabricated (Mawdu') and baseless, with no credible foundation in Islamic tradition.
Attempts to propagate it are rooted in falsehood and hold no significance, as the integrity of the Quran and the Prophet (peace be upon him) remains firmly established.

Related Results

KONTROVERSI TENTANG KISAH GHARANIQ: STUDI KOMPARATIF PEMIKIRAN FAKHRUDDIN AR-RAZI DAN JALALUDDIN AS-SUYUTHITERKAIT QS. AL-HAJJ AYAT 52
KONTROVERSI TENTANG KISAH GHARANIQ: STUDI KOMPARATIF PEMIKIRAN FAKHRUDDIN AR-RAZI DAN JALALUDDIN AS-SUYUTHITERKAIT QS. AL-HAJJ AYAT 52
Penelitian ini mengkaji QS. al-Hajj ayat 52 dalam konteks kisah gharaniq melalui studi komparatif penafsiran dua tokoh besar dalam sejarah tafsir, yaitu Fakhruddin Ar-Razi dan Jala...
نصر حامدابو زید کے قرآن اور وحی سے متعلق افکار کا تنقیدی جائزہ
نصر حامدابو زید کے قرآن اور وحی سے متعلق افکار کا تنقیدی جائزہ
Nasr Hamid Abu Zayd was an Egyptian author. He is known for his mission of Quran’s hermeneutic, which challenged mainstream views. His views about Quran and revelation are new. He ...
Briefe / Hermann Gunkel - Eine Biographie
Briefe / Hermann Gunkel - Eine Biographie
Julius Wellhausen (1844-1918), initially a Professor of Old Testament Studies at the Faculty of Theology in Greifswald and then a Professor of Semitic Studies at the Faculties of P...
Janko Kersnik
Janko Kersnik
Janko Kersnik (1852–1897) was involved in various fields: as a notary (briefly as an attorney), in economics and finance (property management, farming, forestry, hunting, etc.), in...

Back to Top