Javascript must be enabled to continue!
General Practitioners’ Perspectives and Barriers to Deprescribing Inappropriate Medications in Primary Care
View through CrossRef
Introduction and objective: Potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) is associated with adverse drug reactions and negative outcomes in older adults. The objective of the study was to assess the reasons expressed by General Practitioner’s (GPs) to maintain their patients' PIP or the barriers to deprescribe. Material and Methods: a mixed quantitative-qualitative study to explore the GPs’ decisions and perspectives about reviewing PIP that were notified to GPs by an alert system (AS-PIP). The AS-PIP allowed GPs to send feedback information about the barriers for treatment modification, deprescribing or circumstances that were considered when taking the decision about not make any change in the medication schedule. Five types of PIP were selected. Patient reports with PIP were sent to GPs in two phases (April/2016 and July/2016). Theoretical Domains Framework was employed to classify GPs’ opinions and barriers on maintaining PIP. GPs’ feedback frequency, total and according to type of medication with PIP, and frequency distribution among main reasons recorded by GPs justifying their decision after reviewing PIP were calculated. Percentage reductions for each PIP were also evaluated. Results: The main reasons given by GPs to explain why they continued to prescribe potentially inappropriate medication were: another physician originally issued the prescription; patients had good or bad control of their illness; and the treatment was not a potential risk to the patient. The most significant views were coded into 5 domains: (i) knowledge, (ii) social/professional role and identity,(iii) beliefs about capabilities, (iv) memory, attention and decision processes, and (v) social influences. Conclusions: The study highlights the reasons given by GPs for maintaining PIP. The process of deprescribing seems to lace with many challenges for GPs. The most relevant views are associated with no update in therapeutic knowledge, social pressure or influences, and lack of professional leadership
SciVision Publishers LLC
Title: General Practitioners’ Perspectives and Barriers to Deprescribing Inappropriate Medications in Primary Care
Description:
Introduction and objective: Potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) is associated with adverse drug reactions and negative outcomes in older adults.
The objective of the study was to assess the reasons expressed by General Practitioner’s (GPs) to maintain their patients' PIP or the barriers to deprescribe.
Material and Methods: a mixed quantitative-qualitative study to explore the GPs’ decisions and perspectives about reviewing PIP that were notified to GPs by an alert system (AS-PIP).
The AS-PIP allowed GPs to send feedback information about the barriers for treatment modification, deprescribing or circumstances that were considered when taking the decision about not make any change in the medication schedule.
Five types of PIP were selected.
Patient reports with PIP were sent to GPs in two phases (April/2016 and July/2016).
Theoretical Domains Framework was employed to classify GPs’ opinions and barriers on maintaining PIP.
GPs’ feedback frequency, total and according to type of medication with PIP, and frequency distribution among main reasons recorded by GPs justifying their decision after reviewing PIP were calculated.
Percentage reductions for each PIP were also evaluated.
Results: The main reasons given by GPs to explain why they continued to prescribe potentially inappropriate medication were: another physician originally issued the prescription; patients had good or bad control of their illness; and the treatment was not a potential risk to the patient.
The most significant views were coded into 5 domains: (i) knowledge, (ii) social/professional role and identity,(iii) beliefs about capabilities, (iv) memory, attention and decision processes, and (v) social influences.
Conclusions: The study highlights the reasons given by GPs for maintaining PIP.
The process of deprescribing seems to lace with many challenges for GPs.
The most relevant views are associated with no update in therapeutic knowledge, social pressure or influences, and lack of professional leadership.
Related Results
A Review on Deprescribing in Elderly
A Review on Deprescribing in Elderly
Deprescribing can be defined as the process of stopping a medication or reducing its dose to reduce adverse effects and improve health outcomes. Elderly people with co morbidities ...
Effective deprescribing in primary care without deterioration of health-related outcomes
Effective deprescribing in primary care without deterioration of health-related outcomes
Medication reviews focusing on deprescribing can reduce potentially
inappropriate medication; however, evidence regarding the effects on
health-related outcomes is scares. In a rea...
Accuracy of the Screening Tool for Autism in Toddlers and Young Children in the primary care setting
Accuracy of the Screening Tool for Autism in Toddlers and Young Children in the primary care setting
Feasible and accurate assessment tools developed for non-specialists are needed to scale community-based models of autism evaluation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate use ...
Deprescribing interventions for gabapentinoids in adults: a scoping review
Deprescribing interventions for gabapentinoids in adults: a scoping review
The emerging issue of rising gabapentinoid misuse is being recognised
alongside the lack of current evidence supporting the safe and effective
deprescribing of gabapentinoids. This...
DEPRESCRIBING IN OLDER POLY‐TREATED PATIENTS AFFECTED WITH DEMENTIA: A SHARED EXPERIENCE BETWEEN UNIVERSITY AND TERRITORY
DEPRESCRIBING IN OLDER POLY‐TREATED PATIENTS AFFECTED WITH DEMENTIA: A SHARED EXPERIENCE BETWEEN UNIVERSITY AND TERRITORY
AbstractIntroductionThe present study aimed to assess geriatric poly‐treated patients of the Center for Cognitive Disorders and Dementia of Catanzaro Lido, in collaboration with th...
e0565 Analysis of inappropriate therapy in the patients implantable cardioverter defibrillators
e0565 Analysis of inappropriate therapy in the patients implantable cardioverter defibrillators
Objective
Observed the efficacy of the patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD). Sought to identify the reasons of inappropriate shocks, to min...
Patient Perspectives of Health System Barriers to Accessing Care for Hidradenitis Suppurativa
Patient Perspectives of Health System Barriers to Accessing Care for Hidradenitis Suppurativa
ImportancePatient-perceived barriers to hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) care are poorly understood. Understanding health care barriers is a critical first step toward improving care ...
Perceptions of Telemedicine and Rural Healthcare Access in a Developing Country: A Case Study of Bayelsa State, Nigeria
Perceptions of Telemedicine and Rural Healthcare Access in a Developing Country: A Case Study of Bayelsa State, Nigeria
Abstract
Introduction
Telemedicine is the remote delivery of healthcare services using information and communication technologies and has gained global recognition as a solution to...


