Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Implementing FAIR Principles in the IPCC Assessment Process
View through CrossRef
<p>The Assessment Reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) have provided the scientific basis underpinning far reaching policy decisions.The reports also have a huge influence on public debate about climate change. The IPCC is not responsible either for the evaluation of climate data and related emissions and socioeconomic data and scenarios or for the provision of advice on policy (reports must be &#8220;neutral, policy-relevant but not policy-prescriptive&#8221;). These omissions may appear unreasonable at first sight, but they are part of the well-tested structure which enables the creation of authoritative reports on the complex and sensitive subject of climate change. The responsibility for evaluation of climate data and related emissions and socioeconomic data and scenarios remains with the global scientific community. The IPCC has the task of undertaking an expert, objective assessment of the state of scientific knowledge as expressed in the scientific literature. The exclusion of responsibility for providing policy advice from the IPCC remit allows the IPCC to stay clear of discussions of political priorities.&#160;</p><p>These distinctions and limitations influence the way in which the findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable (FAIR) data principles are applied to the work of the IPCC Assessment. There are hundreds of figures in the IPCC Assessment Reports, showing line graphs, global or regional maps, and many other displays of data and information. These figures are put together by the authors using data resources which are described in the scientific literature that is being assessed. The figures are there to illustrate or clarify points raised in the text of the assessment. Increasingly, the figures also provide quantitative information which is of critical importance for many individuals and organisations which are seeking to exploit IPCC knowledge.&#160;</p><p>This presentation will discuss the process of implementing the FAIR data principles within the IPCC assessment process. It will also review both the value of the FAIR principles to the IPCC authors and the IPCC process and the value of the FAIR data products that the process is expected to generate.</p>
Title: Implementing FAIR Principles in the IPCC Assessment Process
Description:
<p>The Assessment Reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) have provided the scientific basis underpinning far reaching policy decisions.
The reports also have a huge influence on public debate about climate change.
The IPCC is not responsible either for the evaluation of climate data and related emissions and socioeconomic data and scenarios or for the provision of advice on policy (reports must be &#8220;neutral, policy-relevant but not policy-prescriptive&#8221;).
These omissions may appear unreasonable at first sight, but they are part of the well-tested structure which enables the creation of authoritative reports on the complex and sensitive subject of climate change.
The responsibility for evaluation of climate data and related emissions and socioeconomic data and scenarios remains with the global scientific community.
The IPCC has the task of undertaking an expert, objective assessment of the state of scientific knowledge as expressed in the scientific literature.
The exclusion of responsibility for providing policy advice from the IPCC remit allows the IPCC to stay clear of discussions of political priorities.
&#160;</p><p>These distinctions and limitations influence the way in which the findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable (FAIR) data principles are applied to the work of the IPCC Assessment.
There are hundreds of figures in the IPCC Assessment Reports, showing line graphs, global or regional maps, and many other displays of data and information.
These figures are put together by the authors using data resources which are described in the scientific literature that is being assessed.
The figures are there to illustrate or clarify points raised in the text of the assessment.
Increasingly, the figures also provide quantitative information which is of critical importance for many individuals and organisations which are seeking to exploit IPCC knowledge.
&#160;</p><p>This presentation will discuss the process of implementing the FAIR data principles within the IPCC assessment process.
It will also review both the value of the FAIR principles to the IPCC authors and the IPCC process and the value of the FAIR data products that the process is expected to generate.
</p>.
Related Results
FAIR-IMPACT
FAIR-IMPACT
In this poster we present the FAIR-IMPACT project, “Expanding FAIR solutions across EOSC”, which is funded by the European Commission Horizon Europe programme. The acronym FAIR st...
A Capacity Building Program for developing FAIR skills
A Capacity Building Program for developing FAIR skills
GO FAIR is an international, bottom-up movement dedicated to adhering as closely as possible to the FAIR Guiding Principles in the implementation of data and services as outlined i...
A study of the impact of an interprofessional education module in Vietnam on students’ readiness and competencies
A study of the impact of an interprofessional education module in Vietnam on students’ readiness and competencies
Introduction
The literature puts forward a range of challenges of interprofessional education (IPE) related to its planning, initiation, implementation, and esp...
Managing a FAIR Climate Change Data Catalogue: Lessons Learned from IPCC AR6 and Recommendations for AR7
Managing a FAIR Climate Change Data Catalogue: Lessons Learned from IPCC AR6 and Recommendations for AR7
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Data Distribution Centre (DDC) serves as a critical registry for climate change data, providing a shared infrastructure to ensu...
Administering Fair Use
Administering Fair Use
Fair use is not working. As written by Congress and applied by the courts, the fair use law fails to give individuals sufficiently clear guidance to determine in advance whether th...
A three-electrode structured ionic polymer carbon-composite actuator with improved electromechanical performance
A three-electrode structured ionic polymer carbon-composite actuator with improved electromechanical performance
Abstract
Ionic polymer carbon-composite (IPCC) is a kind of ionic electroactive polymer with a Nafion/ionic liquid electrolyte layer between two multi-walled carb...
Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Managed Peat Soils: Is the IPCC Reporting Guidance Realistic?
Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Managed Peat Soils: Is the IPCC Reporting Guidance Realistic?
Drainage of peatlands leads to the decomposition of peat, resulting in substantial losses of carbon and nitrogen to the atmosphere. The conservation and restoration of peatlands ca...
Debunking the Fair Use vs. Fair Dealing Myth: Have We Had Fair Use All Along?
Debunking the Fair Use vs. Fair Dealing Myth: Have We Had Fair Use All Along?
According to conventional wisdom, a fundamental difference exists between the American fair use doctrine and the Canadian fair dealing doctrine (or that of other Commonwealth count...

