Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Administering Fair Use

View through CrossRef
Fair use is not working. As written by Congress and applied by the courts, the fair use law fails to give individuals sufficiently clear guidance to determine in advance whether their uses of copyrighted works are fair and therefore noninfringing. When the law does not regulate adequately, markets can supply the rules. Thus, copyright owners and prospective users of copyrighted works can - and do - negotiate over and enter into contracts specifying permissible uses. However, leaving fair use to the market is far from desirable. Fair use is not meant to be something that is sold and bought like other market goods. Fair use is free use. Nobody is meant to be paying for the privilege of using a copyrighted work in a manner that the law deems not to infringe the copyright in the work. Moreover, the fair use market is not a fair market. The failure of Congress and of the courts to provide clear guidance on the meaning of fair use permits copyright owners to leverage the vagueness of the law and persuade prospective users that virtually any unauthorized use constitutes copyright infringement - and that if the use is not paid for it will result in a lawsuit and substantial damages. This Article offers a new approach to fair use. It proposes a role for the one branch of the federal government that has so far been left out of the picture: the executive branch. In most areas of the law where clear legal directives are needed to guide behavior in particular contexts and where Congress and the courts are unable to supply the clarity, we turn to administrative agencies. An administrative agency can, and should, regulate fair use. Accordingly, the Article offers two possible models of agency regulation. In the first model, an agency is responsible for generating regulations that determine what constitutes fair use in specific contexts as well as preventing efforts to interfere with fair uses of copyrighted works. In the second model, an agency issues fair use regulations and determines prior to any copyright infringement claim being brought in court whether the use in question constitutes fair use. Agency regulation can bring much needed clarity and predictability to fair use in ways that neither Congress nor the courts are able to accomplish; an agency can also protect fair use in ways that the market does not.
Elsevier BV
Title: Administering Fair Use
Description:
Fair use is not working.
As written by Congress and applied by the courts, the fair use law fails to give individuals sufficiently clear guidance to determine in advance whether their uses of copyrighted works are fair and therefore noninfringing.
When the law does not regulate adequately, markets can supply the rules.
Thus, copyright owners and prospective users of copyrighted works can - and do - negotiate over and enter into contracts specifying permissible uses.
However, leaving fair use to the market is far from desirable.
Fair use is not meant to be something that is sold and bought like other market goods.
Fair use is free use.
Nobody is meant to be paying for the privilege of using a copyrighted work in a manner that the law deems not to infringe the copyright in the work.
Moreover, the fair use market is not a fair market.
The failure of Congress and of the courts to provide clear guidance on the meaning of fair use permits copyright owners to leverage the vagueness of the law and persuade prospective users that virtually any unauthorized use constitutes copyright infringement - and that if the use is not paid for it will result in a lawsuit and substantial damages.
This Article offers a new approach to fair use.
It proposes a role for the one branch of the federal government that has so far been left out of the picture: the executive branch.
In most areas of the law where clear legal directives are needed to guide behavior in particular contexts and where Congress and the courts are unable to supply the clarity, we turn to administrative agencies.
An administrative agency can, and should, regulate fair use.
Accordingly, the Article offers two possible models of agency regulation.
In the first model, an agency is responsible for generating regulations that determine what constitutes fair use in specific contexts as well as preventing efforts to interfere with fair uses of copyrighted works.
In the second model, an agency issues fair use regulations and determines prior to any copyright infringement claim being brought in court whether the use in question constitutes fair use.
Agency regulation can bring much needed clarity and predictability to fair use in ways that neither Congress nor the courts are able to accomplish; an agency can also protect fair use in ways that the market does not.

Related Results

A Capacity Building Program for developing FAIR skills
A Capacity Building Program for developing FAIR skills
GO FAIR is an international, bottom-up movement dedicated to adhering as closely as possible to the FAIR Guiding Principles in the implementation of data and services as outlined i...
FAIR-IMPACT
FAIR-IMPACT
In this poster we present the FAIR-IMPACT project, “Expanding FAIR solutions across EOSC”, which is funded by the European Commission Horizon Europe programme. The acronym FAIR st...
Debunking the Fair Use vs. Fair Dealing Myth: Have We Had Fair Use All Along?
Debunking the Fair Use vs. Fair Dealing Myth: Have We Had Fair Use All Along?
According to conventional wisdom, a fundamental difference exists between the American fair use doctrine and the Canadian fair dealing doctrine (or that of other Commonwealth count...
Curriculum Development for FAIR Data Stewardship
Curriculum Development for FAIR Data Stewardship
Abstract The FAIR Guidelines attempts to make digital data Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable (FAIR). To prepare FAIR data, a new data science discipl...
Testing the FAIR metrics on data catalogs
Testing the FAIR metrics on data catalogs
The introduction of the FAIR –Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable– principles has caused quite an uproar within the scientific community. Principles which, if everyone ad...
Testing the FAIR metrics on data catalogs
Testing the FAIR metrics on data catalogs
The introduction of the FAIR –Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable– principles has caused quite an uproar within the scientific community. Principles which, if everyone ad...
Features of a FAIR vocabulary
Features of a FAIR vocabulary
Abstract Background: The FAIR Principles explicitly require the use of FAIR vocabularies, but what precisely constitutes a FAIR vocabulary remains unclear. Being able todef...
Transforming Fair Use
Transforming Fair Use
In the United States, the fate of fair use, and by extension, copyright itself, hang in the balance. In recent years, courts have disagreed over fair use’s proper scope. On the one...

Back to Top