Javascript must be enabled to continue!
SU‐FF‐T‐358: PlanCheck: A System for Routine Clinical Comparison of IMRT Treatment Plans with Monte Carlo Recalculations
View through CrossRef
Purpose: Current IMRT QA methods are cumbersome and are not comprehensive. The purpose of the PlanCheck dose recalculation system is to provide independent verification that MLC leaf‐sequences generated by commercial treatment planning system will result in an acceptable dose. Method and Materials: The PlanCheck Beam Commissioning process was developed for medical linear accelerators and includes modeling of the photon energy spectra, off‐axis softening, electron contamination, flattening filter and penumbra blurring. The Monte Carlo beam parameters are derived by fitting treatment planning dose in water and to the measured dose. The system will regenerate the dose for each treatment and for the whole planned dose utilizing the Monte Carlo engine based on beam sequence DICOM/RTOG information imported into PlanCheck. The comparison metrics, including dose‐volume histogram comparisons, report the validation quality and dose agreement. Results: Monte Carlo commissioning was tested for Varian Linear Accelerator (Clinac 2100) for 2×2 cm2, 5×5 cm2, 10×10 cm2 and 20×20 cm2 open fields in water for 6MV, 10MV and 18MV photon beam. The profiles and comparison results show good agreement for Eclipse (Varian) open field dose in water. The IMRT treatment plans from systems such as XiO (CMS), Eclipse (Varian) and Pinnacle (Phillips) were tested with Plancheck for dose agreement with Monte Carlo Dose and found to show adequate agreement. Conclusion: PlanCheck Monte Carlo calculations shows good overall agreement with treatment planning results except for regions with complex heterogeneities. Sun Nuclear Corporation is currently developing this product for intensive commercial use. The system dose engine is currently in process of integration with a 64‐bit/16‐node calculation cluster, which we expect will make the typical IMRT plan calculation time 30 minutes or less for the total planned 3D dose.This research was partially supported by NIH grant R01 CA90445 and a grant from Sun Nuclear, Corp.
Title: SU‐FF‐T‐358: PlanCheck: A System for Routine Clinical Comparison of IMRT Treatment Plans with Monte Carlo Recalculations
Description:
Purpose: Current IMRT QA methods are cumbersome and are not comprehensive.
The purpose of the PlanCheck dose recalculation system is to provide independent verification that MLC leaf‐sequences generated by commercial treatment planning system will result in an acceptable dose.
Method and Materials: The PlanCheck Beam Commissioning process was developed for medical linear accelerators and includes modeling of the photon energy spectra, off‐axis softening, electron contamination, flattening filter and penumbra blurring.
The Monte Carlo beam parameters are derived by fitting treatment planning dose in water and to the measured dose.
The system will regenerate the dose for each treatment and for the whole planned dose utilizing the Monte Carlo engine based on beam sequence DICOM/RTOG information imported into PlanCheck.
The comparison metrics, including dose‐volume histogram comparisons, report the validation quality and dose agreement.
Results: Monte Carlo commissioning was tested for Varian Linear Accelerator (Clinac 2100) for 2×2 cm2, 5×5 cm2, 10×10 cm2 and 20×20 cm2 open fields in water for 6MV, 10MV and 18MV photon beam.
The profiles and comparison results show good agreement for Eclipse (Varian) open field dose in water.
The IMRT treatment plans from systems such as XiO (CMS), Eclipse (Varian) and Pinnacle (Phillips) were tested with Plancheck for dose agreement with Monte Carlo Dose and found to show adequate agreement.
Conclusion: PlanCheck Monte Carlo calculations shows good overall agreement with treatment planning results except for regions with complex heterogeneities.
Sun Nuclear Corporation is currently developing this product for intensive commercial use.
The system dose engine is currently in process of integration with a 64‐bit/16‐node calculation cluster, which we expect will make the typical IMRT plan calculation time 30 minutes or less for the total planned 3D dose.
This research was partially supported by NIH grant R01 CA90445 and a grant from Sun Nuclear, Corp.
Related Results
Dosimetric comparison of 3DCRT and IMRT in radical chemoradiotherapy of squamous cell carcinoma esophagus
Dosimetric comparison of 3DCRT and IMRT in radical chemoradiotherapy of squamous cell carcinoma esophagus
ABSTRACT
Background:
Radical chemoradiation is the standard of treatment for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of esophagus and for patien...
Dosimetric comparative study of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT), Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT), and ThreeDimensional Conformal Radiation therapy (3DCRT) for post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) in Left breast cancer patients
Dosimetric comparative study of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT), Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT), and ThreeDimensional Conformal Radiation therapy (3DCRT) for post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) in Left breast cancer patients
Purpose: To evaluate the difference in planning target volume (PTV) coverage and dose to the organs at risk
(OAR) by using three different planning methods for the same patient-Vol...
SU‐GG‐T‐211: An Independent MU Calculation Program for Dynamic IMRT
SU‐GG‐T‐211: An Independent MU Calculation Program for Dynamic IMRT
Purpose: The performance of an independent monitor unit calculation program is evaluated to verify the monitor unit (MU) for dynamic IMRT fields. The MU calculation program runs on...
Metaheuristic-Based IMRT Optimization for Lung Cancer Treatment under Respiratory Motion
Metaheuristic-Based IMRT Optimization for Lung Cancer Treatment under Respiratory Motion
Introduction: Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) is a widely adopted cancer treatment technique due to its precision in delivering radiation doses to tumors while minimiz...
SU‐GG‐T‐572: Are Constant Dose Rate VMAT Plans Clinically Acceptable? — A Site‐By‐Site Plan Comparison Study
SU‐GG‐T‐572: Are Constant Dose Rate VMAT Plans Clinically Acceptable? — A Site‐By‐Site Plan Comparison Study
Purpose: To evaluate the adequacy of constant dose rate (CDR) VMAT plans for clinical use of commonly treated sites. The clinical acceptability of CDR VMAT plans was evaluated base...
XII Congresso da Sociedade Brasileira de Radioterapia (SBRT); X Jornada de Física Médica; VIII Encontro de Enfermeiros Oncologistas em Radioterapia; VII Encontro de Técnicos em Radioterapia da SBRT
XII Congresso da Sociedade Brasileira de Radioterapia (SBRT); X Jornada de Física Médica; VIII Encontro de Enfermeiros Oncologistas em Radioterapia; VII Encontro de Técnicos em Radioterapia da SBRT
Resumos escolhidos para publicação. Nessa edição, os títulos foram: Resposta das Células da Medula Óssea Submetidas ao Tratamento com a-tocoferol e Radiação, in vivo; Câncer de Mam...
SU‐C‐211‐04: Evaluation of IMRT and VMAT Treatment Plan Quality Delivered with and Without Flattening Filter Using Pareto Optimal Fronts
SU‐C‐211‐04: Evaluation of IMRT and VMAT Treatment Plan Quality Delivered with and Without Flattening Filter Using Pareto Optimal Fronts
Purpose: To evaluate treatment plan quality of IMRT and VMAT plans for high energy photon beams delivered with (FF) and without (FFF) flattening filter. Methods: 9‐field IMRT and 3...
Ten-Year Outcomes of IMRT With Chemotherapy Versus IMRT Alone for Stage Ⅱ-Ⅳa Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study
Ten-Year Outcomes of IMRT With Chemotherapy Versus IMRT Alone for Stage Ⅱ-Ⅳa Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study
Abstract
Background
Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is the cornerstone of treatment for patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). However, ...

