Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The logic of Chinese business strategy: East versus West: Part I
View through CrossRef
PurposeDespite close to two decades of foreign direct investment in China, and the country's enormous market potential, most US and European multinational corporations have never made a profit in that country. The distribution of profits among multinationals also seems highly skewed. The latest survey on profitability showed that five US companies accounted for one‐third of equity profits among US‐based multinationals in China. This research proposes explanations for why multinationals fail in China and strategic solutions for profitable operations.Design/methodology/approachThrough in‐depth interviews with 29 CEOs and directors of major, profitable US and European multinationals, overseas Chinese companies and People's Republic of China companies, this paper proposes a model of strategic convergence for successful operations in China. The first part discusses cultural and cognitive differences between Westerners and Chinese that affect the strategies they choose. The second part proposes a strategic model of convergence, fusing the best of both Western and Chinese business practices, for strategic success in China.FindingsProfitable foreign multinationals in China appeared to modify their management practices on eight dimensions, often adopting traditional Chinese methods of strategic planning and evaluations of effectiveness, as well as relations with key stakeholders, especially the government. Yet, these multinationals continued to retain their Western norms and values in business dealings. Conversely, profitable Chinese companies that competed with these multinationals also modified their management practices in line with Western normsOriginality/valueThe study has implications for the management of foreign subsidiaries in China as well as the successful management of Chinese foreign direct investment in the US and Europe.
Title: The logic of Chinese business strategy: East versus West: Part I
Description:
PurposeDespite close to two decades of foreign direct investment in China, and the country's enormous market potential, most US and European multinational corporations have never made a profit in that country.
The distribution of profits among multinationals also seems highly skewed.
The latest survey on profitability showed that five US companies accounted for one‐third of equity profits among US‐based multinationals in China.
This research proposes explanations for why multinationals fail in China and strategic solutions for profitable operations.
Design/methodology/approachThrough in‐depth interviews with 29 CEOs and directors of major, profitable US and European multinationals, overseas Chinese companies and People's Republic of China companies, this paper proposes a model of strategic convergence for successful operations in China.
The first part discusses cultural and cognitive differences between Westerners and Chinese that affect the strategies they choose.
The second part proposes a strategic model of convergence, fusing the best of both Western and Chinese business practices, for strategic success in China.
FindingsProfitable foreign multinationals in China appeared to modify their management practices on eight dimensions, often adopting traditional Chinese methods of strategic planning and evaluations of effectiveness, as well as relations with key stakeholders, especially the government.
Yet, these multinationals continued to retain their Western norms and values in business dealings.
Conversely, profitable Chinese companies that competed with these multinationals also modified their management practices in line with Western normsOriginality/valueThe study has implications for the management of foreign subsidiaries in China as well as the successful management of Chinese foreign direct investment in the US and Europe.
Related Results
MECHANISMS OF SCHEMATIC MODELING BASED ON VECTOR LOGIC
MECHANISMS OF SCHEMATIC MODELING BASED ON VECTOR LOGIC
Context. This paper addresses issues relevant to the EDA market – reducing the cost and time of testing and verification of digital projects by synthesizing the logic vector of a d...
Logic in the early 20th century
Logic in the early 20th century
The creation of modern logic is one of the most stunning achievements of mathematics and philosophy in the twentieth century. Modern logic – sometimes called logistic, symbolic log...
East Asian Discourse and Korean Literature in Classical Chinese character
East Asian Discourse and Korean Literature in Classical Chinese character
To define East Asia’s cultural identity as several specific cultural factors is to recognize East Asian culture as objects of ideas, ideals, imagination, and fiction, not as entiti...
Memristor-Based Priority Encoder and Decoder Circuit
Memristor-Based Priority Encoder and Decoder Circuit
Introduction:
Memristors, recognized as the fourth fundamental circuit element, exhibit unique features
such as non-volatility, scalability, and energy efficien...
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
This section provides current contact details and a summary of recent or ongoing clinical trials being coordinated by International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG). Clinical tria...
Chinese cultural symbols in Thailand : a study of Mazu belief in the Chinese community in Bangkok Chinatown
Chinese cultural symbols in Thailand : a study of Mazu belief in the Chinese community in Bangkok Chinatown
The overseas Chinese living around the world constitute a unique and far-reaching social group in the development of modern human history. While seeking survival and development in...
Rationality and Logic
Rationality and Logic
An argument that logic is intrinsically psychological and human psychology is intrinsically logical, and that the connection between human rationality and logic is both constitutiv...
Greek and Roman Logic
Greek and Roman Logic
In ancient philosophy, there is no discipline called “logic” in the contemporary sense of “the study of formally valid arguments.” Rather, once a subfield of philosophy comes to be...

